Anthony Lamot: Hey, Amber! Welcome to the show!
Amber Sellens: Hey! Thanks!
Anthony Lamot: It’s so good to have you here on the show. I think we originally met at a Salesforce conference somewhere last year, where we had a great coffee and a great in-depth chat about marketing ops. So, super pumped to have you here! For starters, can you kind of tell the audience what it is that you do and what was your journey leading up to your current role at Shell Renewables and Energy Solutions?
Amber Sellens: Sure. So, I’ve got a bit of an unconventional path of sorts, and I think it’s really led to my success in marketing ops in general. If I’m being honest, I wasn’t one of those people who grew up knowing that I wanted to be a doctor, a lawyer, or a firefighter. So, I got the opportunity to kind of bop around quite a bit and give myself permission to investigate and explore before I landed on anything permanent. That included managing a coffee house, a pool hall, bartending, working as the executive admin for a marketing firm in downtown Philadelphia, being a subprime mortgage underwriting analyst, and working in insurance on both the health and property and casualty side. And now I’m at Shell.
I’ve had a very robust career thus far, and even within Shell over the past 10 years, it’s been a mix of experiences. I worked with trading and supply, moved to our upstream businesses closer to our assets, then back to downstream, starting up a new brand and doing that twice actually. I’ve also had some experience on the IT side, moving over into the business side, and then bringing that experience back. What I’m currently doing is managing the marketing technology and operations for Shell Energy, our retail energy brand within Shell, as I like to call it.
We focus on bringing low-carbon solutions in the retail electricity space to customers on both the B2B and B2C sides. My team manages both sides of the house and the customer experience across all channels—web, email, social, in-person, hybrid, you name it, we’ve got it.
Anthony Lamot: Awesome. So, one of the things that really stuck with me after our first conversation was how you essentially helped build out this team. There were different aspects to that. One thing I’d like to explore, maybe for some of our more aspirational leaders who watch the show, is how did you go about that organizationally? And second, if you don’t mind sharing, I know you had a really cool structure in mapping out use cases and current capabilities. Could you speak to that organizationally and just how you structured the capabilities?
Amber Sellens: Sure! First and foremost, I just want to say that it was a group effort on all fronts. None of this was the Amber Sellens Show.
I had an amazing business partner, Cassie Hextead, who is phenomenal. Without her and the trust we built within the business, none of this would have been possible. I also want to give a shout-out to Scott Brinker, who provided the foundation for what I elaborated on and ran with. His 4-box model—the orchestrators, builders, modelers, and makers—was key. It helped us bring together all the different pieces needed for cohesive conversations around building successful capabilities.
One of the first big things we did was eliminate any division between our IT team and the business folks. The digital marketers, who sit closer to the sales team on the business side, are a core part of the delivery team. They’re embedded with us, attending daily scrums, planning meetings, and joint strategy calls.
We also worked with external partners like PwC and IBM, especially because some of the skills were new areas for Shell. We brought in external resources, and I was even lucky enough to hire some of those phenomenal resources in-house. My solution architect, for instance, came from the external market.
When developing what we manage and our strategic roadmap for scaling, we’ve approached it like an agile product. Digital marketing is not a project, so our team runs in agile scrum cadences with two-week delivery windows. We’ve focused on establishing a global capability with regional flexibility. We’re also technology agnostic and have taken a very intentional approach, buying rather than building unless we can monetize it, to stay strategic and lean.
Initially, it was expensive, but now we’ve extended the model into other regions. Recently, we stood up an extension of this capability in half the time and at a tenth of the cost, proving its value and generating internal buzz.
Another pivotal moment for me was when one of my mentors, Mary Jarrett, advised me on how to approach internal stakeholders. I was telling everyone about this great solution, but they weren’t taking it up. Mary told me, “It’s one thing to tell them; it’s another to show them.” That shift in mindset—showing instead of just telling—became a turning point for our team.
Amber Sellens: We just decided to put our heads down and do it and do it really well and then, once we started to essentially tell the value story on the back end of that, that’s what caught some buzz. And that’s where we’re able to extend the capability across lines of business into other areas. But it’s really that mindset and mentality that is driving us today.
Anthony Lamot: Very cool. Thank you, Amber, for elaborating on that. There were so many things you said that were of interest to me. First, Scott Brinker loved the shout-out. Scott is, of course, the man who leads the Martech landscape for those who don’t know, though I think most people on this call will be familiar with Scott’s annual paper that he publishes. So that’s super cool.
With regards to what you’ve been doing, Amber, it sounds like, first of all, congratulations on creating that first with the latest project and seeing that you can deliver and roll it out for a fraction of the cost. That’s super cool, especially at your scale—very important. And it sounds like what you’re doing is front-loading, maybe more of an upfront investment, but then afterward you’re going to see economies of scale.
Amber Sellens: Yeah, and we’re also really looking at how we create a horizontal marketing operations team that can manage all these different pieces together. I think we have somewhere around 16 different Martech tools that my team actively manages, and we’re in them all day, every day. It’s all of the Lego blocks that build out the things we’re working with.
It’s the product pillars that we reference, and referencing the model that I’ve built, we’ve got marketing and communications as one pillar, customer data management as another, sales data management and enablement, and then services and offerings delivery. So it’s really four key pillars of the capability that we’ve established. Because we’re starting with capability, what we’re able to do is, say we take a tool like deselect, for example.
Initially, we have the segmentation right, and that falls under marketing and communications management, specifically around the capability to segment our audiences. But then let’s say you guys extend into another space. Instead of us having to go looking for something else, if we were viewing it from a technology-first standpoint, we’d be leading with functionality rather than the why or the how. We might seek tools that have overlapping functionalities and costs.
It takes a lot to spin up a new tool in my environment. So where I can essentially take deselect and copy and paste you into other spaces, it extends the value of the initial investment into the tool itself. Plus, it extends the capability and connectedness where we already have data integrated. That’s the best-case scenario.
We’ve really taken the traditional architecture approach and flipped it on its head so we can be more efficient and scale globally.
Anthony Lamot: Very cool. You mentioned building a horizontal team. Could you speak to that and explain what that means to you?
Amber Sellens: Absolutely. Shell is incredibly matrixed. What I’ve done is essentially built an operations team that sits within one element of our Shell Energy brand in one region. Now, I’m actively extending that team’s allocation across to Europe.
In addition, I’m talking to other lines of business within our downstream efforts that are customer-facing and have similar needs, and seeing if we can’t put together a proof of concept. What does it look like realistically if we have this team or center of excellence? You need digital marketing support? You come to us. You extend our tech stack, which we’re already paying for most of, so you only pay a fraction. You get our tried-and-tested tactics—templates, journeys, SEO learnings, and all the things.
Essentially, it’s building an internal agency where we provide a squad dedicated to marketing operations to different customer groups. We’d have the oversight to bring pieces together, tell consistent stories across audience segments, and amplify our effectiveness and spend—not just in my business unit, but across Shell as a whole.
Anthony Lamot: We’ll just say a hundred x.
Amber Sellens: Sure, it’s arbitrary.
Anthony Lamot: You mentioned storytelling, which leads to my next question. Your mission is to create and deliver compelling stories. Is there a recent campaign or strategy where storytelling played a critical role?
Amber Sellens: On my side, it’s less around the actual content. My role isn’t necessarily the words, it’s the delivery and cohesiveness of the integrated story—how we pull all the pieces together to address the pain point end to end, right?
Amber Sellens: So it’s less about that single piece of content, or that single piece of, you know, whatever that asset is, and it’s more about how do we break it down into its bite-size pieces.
Amber Sellens: So that the customer journey, which is not linear for any business ever, it’s more like a Jackson Pollock painting where you’ve got, you know, you’re just dropping little bits of paint all over the canvas, and you’re trying to follow the footsteps to see, you know, are they more interested in this side or that side? And then, what have you put over there to help them on their journey?
Amber Sellens: It’s a little bit like an RPG in that way. You’re just building a world for them, and then you’re setting up resources along the way for their side quests.
Anthony Lamot: I love your references! As someone who both likes to paint and loves to play RPG video games, you’re hitting all the nerd.
Amber Sellens: But it really is around, you know, those Lego blocks or those bits and pieces, and how you segment it out, and then how you connect the data so that it’s easy to find. You don’t want your customer to have to search for the next piece that’s going to be useful for them. You want to be able to make it really accessible and easy for them to get at.
Amber Sellens: So that they are continuing along on whatever their journey looks like, at the rate that they want to progress it.
Amber Sellens: I think one of the main challenges in this space, especially for a business like Shell, is that at any given point a customer could be a supplier in this part of our business, and a competitor in this part of our business. And so, when it comes to going through and really identifying what that journey should be, it can’t be at the domain level alone, right?
Amber Sellens: We have to ensure that everything we’re building has the right context around the domain, and what that relationship should be for that specific piece, for that asset.
Anthony Lamot: You just reminded me—sorry, go ahead.
Amber Sellens: It did, really fast.
Anthony Lamot: So it’s a puzzle.
Anthony Lamot: It’s also interesting, and maybe you can relate to this because you’ve been in insurance. I remember insurance use cases in segmentation and prioritization where, in a complex B2B2C environment, some insurance brokers have these overall suppression and waterfall rules on what message can be sent by whom under which circumstances, because there may be conflicting messages going out from a broker. If you’re not careful, sometimes there are even legal considerations. I’m kind of starting to visualize, as you talk about how you have such a complex landscape of products and services with individual recipients sometimes having multiple hats—not just at the personal level but also at the company level.
Anthony Lamot: But it must become quite a complex maze or maybe some kind of matrix of, “Okay, I should send this communication to this kind of company, but this company is also a competitor, let’s say, and they should not receive that.” This probably happens all the time for you guys.
Amber Sellens: Yeah, it’s a significant part of why CDP implementation is a bit of a challenge for us, right? It’s because the business rules that we would have to put in place to ensure that we are not infringing on legal elements like insider trading, or you know, some of our businesses, their customers are direct competitors to some of our other businesses, and therefore we can’t even disclose that information. And it’s a significant hurdle when it comes to being able to build that horizontal capability that I want to build.
Amber Sellens: Because there are just simply legal implications and restrictions in a lot of instances. So first, we have to understand not only who this company is on a spreadsheet to this business, but also what it means if that company ends up on this database or this report. You know, we definitely don’t want to be spending money on advertising to our competitor for a product that they wouldn’t consume.
Amber Sellens: And so, the complexity around those business rules can be straightforward. It can be regional. It is really, really complex. And you know, throw in mergers and acquisitions activity on top of that, and it changes, right? So it’s not even like you can do all of the crazy math once and it’s fine. Nothing about this environment is ever “set it and forget it.”
Anthony Lamot: Oh, no, absolutely not. And it’s funny that you mentioned that because on the last episode I interviewed Lucas Lunow from Maersk, so huge enterprise environment, too. And we were talking about the same thing where that wasn’t in a build or buy context. But the idea was that if you are going to have technology, whether you build or buy it, it’s going to evolve. And your data model is going to evolve, especially when you’re doing M. and A. the whole time. But even if you weren’t, it’s going to change over time. So yeah, huge challenge.
And what you mentioned about challenges in implementing this in a CDP. I don’t know if it’s related, but one thing that I’ve noticed that is a limitation of CDPs is that ultimately the vast majority of them tend to work at the segment level, not so much at the subscriber level.
Real-life conversation happened with a very well-known fast-moving consumer goods company, a customer of ours, and they’re like, “Oh, we’re going to do orchestration in the CDP.” But then you ask the question of, “Okay, but how are you going to intervene in the fifth email in a journey at the subscriber level?” And then it’s like, “Oh, right.” So it’s good in theory to do this in the CDP because it’s a center of data, and all the data is going to be there, but it doesn’t necessarily allow you to intervene at the moment of an activity.
So, that’s also where we made that very specific design choice to, for our tech, be at the level of engagement. That has limitations, but at least it allows us to intervene a little bit better there. Bit of a tangent here, but I did want to ask you more about how you think about this in an Omni-channel context, applying that messaging, and how it integrates into your very complex tech stack.
Amber Sellens: Yeah, I mean, we’ve got—it’s a lot of fun, first and foremost, because it’s never dull, it’s never boring, right? And as we mature, we’re able to bring more and more elements of that end-to-end Omni-channel experience together.
Where it gets especially interesting is when we have a, you know, a B2C consumer, for instance, somebody who has Shell Energy as their provider of electricity within their own home. And then we also find out that that individual is also the sustainability manager at a large company that we’re targeting.
So, when it comes to Omni-channel for us, especially, it’s not just across the channel, are you receiving a consistent experience, but also at a persona level. Are you receiving a consistent experience? So if you are somebody who, in your B2B life, are a platinum customer or the highest level concierge, but then people won’t pick up the phone for you in your personal life when you’re providing your own dollars, right? That’s a significant disconnect. And so, that’s less about channel Omni-channel and more about, you know, the consistent experience across the board.
Specifically, where we see it is the kind of the CDP conversation is one that we really haven’t dug a lot into yet, to be honest. And it’s because of our marketing maturity. We haven’t been ready for it. We’ve been on a long kind of people and process journey, where we’ve been trying to get folks to really take the Crm seriously and help them understand what the lead object is for, and implement queues, and do automation where we can, and really starting to get the foundations right in a lot of ways.
Shell itself has been around for over a hundred years, but Shell Energy is really still a baby when it comes to especially the B2C side. We’ve only been in business for two years. So, Omni-channel for us in this area is even more challenging because we are—we’re building brand recognition still. We are trying to establish who our customer base is. We’re still doing a lot of that foundational business stuff.
Anthony Lamot: Stuff, one would say.
Amber Sellens: Right. So we’re a bit of an intrapreneur, I think is what it’s called, where we have the financial safety to really pursue this because we think it’s the right direction to go in. But in a lot of ways, we’re still very much starting up a business and a brand. So, Omni-channel is a little bit different from a Shell Energy approach than it would be from a Shell approach.
Anthony Lamot: And within that mission of Shell, working more towards renewable energy, I wonder, how do you think about the future of Martech? So if you look ahead, how do you think marketing technology might continue to evolve at Shell?
Amber Sellens: Yeah, so I would say it’s definitely continuing to evolve. Where I think it’s really interesting, the intersection of sustainability and marketing technology is really AI. The main reason why I say that is because I recently read an article that had a claim stating something like generating a single email with AI requires three bottles of water in order to keep the servers that process that information cool, you know, to output one thing.
That, to me, is wild. So, when we look at the scaling of marketing technology and how it interacts with responsible energy consumption, I think we need to be asking ourselves more often than not, not can this be AI, but should it be AI? A lot of the problems that we’re trying to solve with AI still could be done through process improvement or just through straight automation and some simple logic. I think a lot of folks are jumping straight to AI as the shortcut to the problem, whereas I do worry about the data center availability and the sustainability angle of that.
Now, when it comes to marketing operations or just a digital marketing capability within Shell, I see that growing. Shell started to take a turn in the last 10 years or so, where they’re definitely becoming more customer-focused. And in order to do that, you need to be able to build a relationship with your customer. The stickiness in it is understanding, beyond just when does Bob order his standard order—it’s usually the 15th of the month, and if we don’t see him by the 17th, if we send him an email, he’ll submit his order. Or, you know, if prices increase by more than two cents a pound, then he’s probably going to hem and haw about it. But if we stay within this threshold, we can usually stay pretty consistent. That’s transactional, right?
And that’s essentially where we’ve played in the past because we’ve been such a large provider of so many different products that we were afforded the luxury, quite honestly, of a transactional relationship with our customer. And the customer expectation was very different at that point in time. So now, when we evaluate the strategy, it’s really around customer-back. And that’s on the B2B as well as the B2B2C side. Realistically, we’re evaluating H2H (human to human), because at no point in time do two buildings do business with each other. It’s really important to consider that human element in everything that we’re doing because it’s humans that are driving the process.
So, the scaling, the evolution—all of that is definitely going to continue to grow. I mean, I know myself personally, I’ve already got projects slated for next year and beyond, and it’s really, really exciting stuff.
Anthony Lamot: There’s a lot of things you say that resonate here at R. These. We have the saying that companies don’t buy software, people buy software. I think it’s true. I’d also love to call out, especially because you’re in energy, but also in Martech, this consideration, this concern over the energy consumption of technology. People say we already have so much data, but truth be told, I think we’re not even storing that much data or not that much unique data. If you think how much more humanity is going to discover and do and capture in so many myriad ways, I think we’re only at the start of this whole data journey. How we’re going to store, process, serve, and preserve it is a really interesting challenge.
Now, I feel we could go on for a long time, Amber. We do need to round up this interview. I have two more questions. First, I know from my own personal experience by connecting you with people in my network that you are great at giving advice to aspiring Martech leaders. Are there some parting words of wisdom you’d like to share with our listeners?
Amber Sellens: Sure, I would say for folks looking to continue to pursue this space, I would focus on what I consider the four C’s: curiosity, communication, confidence, and community. The main reason I say those four is because—first off, curiosity is pretty self-explanatory. There are over 14,000 different Martech solutions in the landscape today, and that’s only going to continue to grow exponentially at a rate we’ve never seen. So it’s so important to remain curious.
In that same breath, failure is a blessing. It’s one of my favorite F words because if you never fail, you’re doing one of two things. You’re either not exploring, you’re not innovating, or you’re just not trying, right? Or you’re incredibly lucky. And neither of those things are sustainable.
Amber Sellens: One of my favorite quotes is by Nelson Mandela, “I never fail. I either win or I learn.” Inspired by this, I’ve created a “Mandela Master Award” for my team. At the end of the year, the entire team votes on the most impactful learning of the year. The winner gets a little trophy, a light bulb with their name on it, and becomes the Mandela Master for the year.
Communication and storytelling are vital in anything you do. I went to school for management information systems, which I jokingly said was just learning how to translate geek to English and back again. But that’s been my bread and butter throughout my career—the ability to tell the story to the audience that you have, not necessarily the one that would be easiest for you to relate to.
It’s really about seeking to understand more than to be understood, focusing on what the audience needs in that moment, and tailoring the message to make the most impact.
I also say confidence is important because, especially in marketing operations, there’s rampant imposter syndrome. About 10 years ago, I had a mindset shift: If you’re in the room, there’s a reason you’re there. Own it. That was massive for me. Also, make sure you’re investing in yourself—attend the conferences, take the course, go to the webinar. It’s important to keep growing in the space, and that’s how you build confidence.
Finally, community. This is a new and constantly evolving space. There are amazing marketing communities that help us all learn. A rising tide raises all ships. We mentioned Scott Brinker and Frans Riemersma earlier with Chiefmartec.com, but there are also great groups like MarTech.org, Gartner, Forrester, Mike Rizzo’s MO Pros community, and events like Mopsapalooza, where I’ll be a speaker this year. Carlos Doughty with LXA is doing amazing things focusing on capability over technology, and Anticon is another great event.
Don’t be afraid to reach out. This community is universally committed to supporting one another. It’s a safe space that I haven’t experienced in other industries. So, send the LinkedIn request, ask the question—the worst thing that can happen is not asking and being stuck with incorrect information or not progressing at all.
Anthony Lamot: Absolutely. It’s been surprising to me that many in marketing operations or automation feel isolated. Often, they’re part of small teams or even working alone, even in large organizations. They don’t have a lot of peers to learn from or lean on. That’s why we do things like customer dinners or host virtual industry meetups, like the one we have for higher education, for instance.
Also, I totally relate to the imposter syndrome. When I started my company, I didn’t even feel comfortable calling myself CEO on LinkedIn. It took me a while to let go of the “consultant” title. Once I did, it was a big shift. As you said, once you let yourself overcome that, everything changes.
So, you mentioned not being afraid to connect—where can people find you?
Amber Sellens: I’m on LinkedIn under Amber Sellens. I’m always happy to connect, do a virtual coffee, or chat about any issues or questions people may have.
Anthony Lamot: Awesome, Amber. Thank you so much for your time. This was a great conversation.
Amber Sellens: Of course! Thanks for having me.
Discover how our platform instantly optimizes your Marketing Cloud
Anthony Lamot: Hello, and welcome to Heroes of Marketing Cloud, the show where I interview Marketing Cloud experts. My name is Anthony Lamot, I’m the CEO and co-founder at DESelect, and today I’m talking with Lukas Lunow.
Anthony Lamot: Lukas has had a tremendous career, including being an architect for many years at Salesforce, and for over a year now, he’s been a Senior Engineering Manager at Maersk, a global logistics company, leading a team of engineers and architects. Lukas gives great insights on how to think about architecting, designing, and strategizing your Marketing Cloud and beyond, and he also offers advice, like how a great architect listens. On that note, I hope you have a great listen. Sit back, relax, and enjoy.
Anthony Lamot: Hi, Lukas! Welcome to the show!
Lukas Lunow: Hi, Anthony. Thank you, and thanks for having me.
Anthony Lamot: It’s such a pleasure. We’ve exchanged messages for quite a while online. I’ve been following you for a long time, so it’s super cool to have you here. I’d like to start off with the question: what inspired you to become a leader in this space? I think it will be interesting for people on the call to hear about your career journey and how you found your way into Marketing Cloud.
Lukas Lunow: Yeah, that’s a good question. My adventure with Marketing Cloud actually started more or less exactly 10 years ago. I was working with a media company in Denmark back then, and we had just acquired what was then ExactTarget. I went to Indianapolis for my first Connections conference.
Anthony Lamot: Can you still hear me, Lukas?
Lukas Lunow: Yes.
Anthony Lamot: The last thing I heard was 10 years ago, Indianapolis, your first Connections, and how Journey Builder had just been announced.
Lukas Lunow: Right, 10 years ago I attended my first Connections conference in Indianapolis, the hometown of ExactTarget, now Salesforce Marketing Cloud. That was where Journey Builder was announced, and you’d think Journey Builder has been around forever, but it’s actually relatively new. I still have photos and recordings from back then—it looked nothing like it does today.
After that, I joined a marketing agency and then became a Salesforce partner before joining Salesforce itself, where I stayed for more than six years. I was super happy there, had fantastic customers, and traveled around Europe, inspiring people and building some really nice Marketing Cloud implementations for global customers.
But at some point, you want and need to try something new. I wanted to see how successful I could become building my own organization and inspiring my own employees. So with all the knowledge and experience I gained, I wanted to pass it on to those around me and watch them grow.
I joined Maersk over a year ago, where I’m responsible for a team of engineers and architects working on not only Marketing Cloud, but also cross-cloud projects across multiple Salesforce clouds, always in the context of marketing—like lead nurturing, lead acquisition, and digital journeys for new and existing customers. It’s a huge, global impact at a multi-billion dollar international logistics company, so it’s been super exciting.
Anthony Lamot: That sounds awesome! I think the only thing that hasn’t changed over the years is the ExactTarget URL, which is still in use, hilariously. I’m sure our audience would love to see some of those older Journey Builder photos, I know I would!
Lukas Lunow: Yeah, I can find them and share them with you. I also found a reference to the recording of the Journey Builder keynote from back then—super nostalgic and fun to watch. It’s still online on Marketing Cloud’s YouTube channel.
Anthony Lamot: That would be great! So, you’ve had a fascinating career. What was the transition like moving to Maersk and leading a global team?
Lukas Lunow: It was, and still is, challenging. When you’re a consultant, you come in with specific tasks, and most decisions are already made. But being part of an organization means ongoing efforts—not just building what’s planned, but contributing to planning: what do we build next year? What resources do we need? Do we build in-house or buy from a vendor?
A lot more time is spent on discussions and meetings. As a consultant, your hours are valuable, focused on delivering immediate results. But now, it’s more about long-term value rather than just building something here and now.
Anthony Lamot: I hear a lot about alignment and long-term value—this resonates with me as I’m building an organization, too, though in a different context. Thanks for sharing that. If I can go on a small tangent, you mentioned in passing the build vs. buy decision. How do you approach that?
Lukas Lunow: It really depends on the complexity of the solution. For a simple integration, like connecting Facebook lead forms to Marketing Cloud, you might choose to use something like Zapier—straightforward, quick, and effective.
But for more complex projects, like building a Customer Data Platform (CDP), things get trickier. Let’s say we commit 20 engineers to building a CDP. After six months, when it’s done, Salesforce might have already released new features or capabilities in Data Cloud, leaving you behind.
It’s about weighing whether the effort to build in-house will keep pace with advancements in the market. Sometimes, it’s just more strategic to buy a solution that evolves rapidly.
Lukas Lunow: You only committed to have these 20 people working for half a year on this project. But then your target is actually moved further away from you. Do you continue allocating them? Do you actually want to put many more engineers on this task? That’s, I think, the really important consideration, and not so much can you build it, but can you build and keep on improving that? You have various data sources—Facebook can change their API, you can have another application changing their API—you always need to adapt to ongoing changes and fix stuff.
So what do you prefer? Do you prefer to have a company like Salesforce, Microsoft, whoever provide something for you as software as a service? You don’t need to worry about your roadmap; it’s being taken care of for you. You don’t need to care about maintenance; it is taken care of for you, and you only need to focus on driving value out of this, right?
Anthony Lamot: Makes all sense to me. I’ve seen customers do both—buy or build. Now, sometimes I do think there’s sense in building when it’s super industry-specific or super customer-specific, and the vendor will never give in to such customization because they have to serve a large base, right? That’s, you know, for a vendor like us, too—we need to take into account what all our customers want. We can’t just cater to one single customer. But having said that, the mistake that you point out that customers make or teams that want to build their own stuff make is that they sometimes don’t factor in not just the maintenance and hosting, which is also a real thing, but the ongoing support, the ongoing development. Because the reality is that probably a ton of your stuff is gonna come up afterwards. I know it was in my own CRM, too. We implemented that, but then tons of little small requests and changes do occur over time. You need that support foreseeably.
Anthony Lamot: Lukas, you’ve just been named Salesforce Marketing Champion, so hey, welcome to the club.
Lukas Lunow: Thank you.
Anthony Lamot: But you’re also a Salesforce Forum Ambassador, and so that’s something that I’m actually not even familiar with myself. So I think it will be really interesting for our audience if you could just briefly highlight the difference between these two denominations?
Lukas Lunow: Salesforce Marketing Champion is a title given to people who are passionate about their technology and are eager to share knowledge with the rest of the world by contributing with their own blogs, being Trailblazer community group leaders, or similar around Marketing Cloud, whereas Trailblazer Forum Ambassador is more about people who are active in the Trailblazer community online.
I started off by posting answers on Salesforce Stack Exchange, but the number of questions has been declining over the years, and now I mostly contribute to the Trailblazer community groups on Marketing Cloud. Forum Ambassadors have that extra privilege—they can delete questions, they have some authority on the forums, and they can be the extended law enforcement of Salesforce beyond their own staff, who is also, of course, monitoring these forums. My main agenda, or one of my key agendas, is to improve the quality of the questions being posted. We often really need a lot of context when people ask about specific problems. Sometimes it’s just a single sentence. I expect people to do some research before they post something—I don’t want people to basically post, “Hey, do this for me.”
The other item on my agenda for being the Forum Ambassador is—and I know I’m fighting a losing battle—but it is to fight answers that are clearly generated with LLMs, like generative AI or chatbots. I see a lot of examples where people just take the question, paste it into a prompt on ChatGPT, and then paste the response into the community groups. And it’s often really, really rubbish—it doesn’t address the actual point of the question, and it’s often misleading. We’ve all heard about AI hallucinations, where it suggests you use script functions that don’t even exist. It’s a bit funny, but also super annoying, because if you’re new to Marketing Cloud or don’t have experience in AMPScript, you might take it for granted that this is an accurate answer. It looks legitimate, so you might struggle for some time to make it work, when in fact, it will never work.
Anthony Lamot: That’s so interesting that you’re fighting against that. So for people browsing such forums, what will be a telltale sign, you think, that the answer is Gen AI-generated?
Lukas Lunow: I think the main giveaway is that the AI-generated responses often have a lot of specific formatting—bullet points, bold words at the beginning of an item list. You can read it, and it’s kind of addressing the question, but it never questions the question itself. It never says, “Are you sure this is the right thing to do? Have you considered this versus that?” It just says, “In order to solve this specific problem, these are the steps you can follow,” and then lists steps below. It often finishes with something like, “Should this not be effective, you can always reach out to your Salesforce account executive or support to get more guidance.” It’s always the same formula. When you start reading through the content, you can start seeing that the answers are quite poor.
Anthony Lamot: So Lukas, aside from being the guardian of the Trailblazer community against Gen AI-generated answers, you’re also very vocal on LinkedIn. One of the things that I noticed you’ve talked about a few times is that companies will often rush into Marketing Cloud implementations without strategy and preparation. Especially for someone with your role, you probably have a few interesting insights you can share on how you think about strategic planning. Maybe you even have an example?
Lukas Lunow: Yes. Sometimes I see that Marketing Cloud is being oversold by Salesforce. People suffer from the Dreamforce effect—they’ve seen a lot of fantastic use cases by Coca-Cola, by Heathrow Airport, or whoever, and they think, “Wow, if we can just get our hands on Marketing Cloud, it will solve everything for us.”
There are two things that go wrong—well, many things can go wrong—but two main issues are: people might be using another tool today, for instance, Adobe Campaign or Eloqua, and what they do is they just do a lift and shift. They take the data they put into Eloqua today and use the same integrations to put it into Marketing Cloud. They copy the same types of journeys, the same types of emails, and paste them into Marketing Cloud. Often, the problem is a combination of the platform and the entire system landscape. They might not have a specific system of record for customer identity, they might not have uniqueness in their leads and contacts, so you can have five leads with the same email address because they’re not being deduplicated when people submit a form on the website. If you just do a lift and shift, the issues will prevail. Even with Marketing Cloud, you’ll keep struggling with the same challenges.
It’s really important to team up with an experienced architect who not only knows Marketing Cloud but also understands enterprise landscapes, and address the entire system landscape before even considering replacing your marketing automation platform.
Lukas Lunow: Yeah, I think logistics. And this came as a surprise to me when I joined this case—how complex logistics products are. It’s not just about shipping a container from Singapore to Rotterdam, or from Los Angeles to Vancouver. It’s about capacity planning. If you’re not in need of a shipment to be at a specific port at a specific time, you can buy an option that says, “Well, we might or might not load you on this ship.” If others are willing to pay more, they’ll go first; you’ll go on the next one.
You can buy a lot of value-added services. Right now, we’re focusing on providing a complete solution in logistics. It’s not only about sailing from Port A to Port B with your container—we can also pick it up from your warehouse and deliver it when it arrives at the port of destination. It’s super complex, with many factors to consider. There are different types of customers—huge ones shipping tons of cargo weekly from Asia to Europe or North America, with big contracts. And then there are smaller customers, like expats needing a container for furniture or a bicycle.
We try to cater to everyone. Imagine the complexity of digital marketing: you need to explain all the options and the complexity of our products to advanced customers, while also making it easy for someone just shipping a container once every five years. The whole customer journey is a challenge, especially with big accounts, where the consideration phase might take six months and involve many different roles—from C-level executives to logistics managers.
It’s crucial to understand who to involve at each stage of the decision process and what messaging to send them. C-level executives don’t care about tracking and tracing; they care about price and reliability. Operations teams, however, may need integrations with our systems. The vast attributes of our offerings are demanded by different people at different stages, which makes the journey and content design challenging. But it also gives us value from first-party data, allowing us to intelligently drive these dialogues over months of lead nurturing.
Anthony Lamot: Super interesting. There’s actually a parallel with my business. A significant portion of our revenue comes from enterprise customers—companies with over 10,000 employees—and the sales cycles can be six months or longer, especially in complex industries like financial services. One challenge is the handover to sales, where marketing takes a backseat and focuses more on sales enablement. I’m curious about how you see that handover between marketing and sales, and how marketing continues beyond that point.
Lukas Lunow: Yeah, it’s a complex transition. Looking back to my consultancy days, I’ve always seen big companies struggle with aligning sales and marketing. I might become unpopular with salespeople, but I’ve noticed that marketing tends to better understand how sales works, more so than the reverse. Sales often sees marketing as the team that handles banners at trade shows or old-school branding campaigns on television or YouTube.
The key is aligned KPIs between sales and marketing. It doesn’t help if marketing is tasked with delivering 100 marketing-qualified leads per week, but sales doesn’t pick them up promptly. These leads won’t stay hot forever. Sales needs KPIs that measure how quickly they act on leads, ensuring consistency throughout the funnel to drive conversions efficiently. If marketing and sales have separate KPIs without overlap, you’re not setting up for success.
Anthony Lamot: That makes a lot of sense. Having done both marketing and sales—initially while bootstrapping our company—I can say sales is an underestimated craft. But marketing is complex. It’s the most data-driven function in our company, and everyone has an opinion about it, whether it’s the color or shape of a logo, making people think it’s easy, but it really isn’t.
Speaking of your role, Lukas, how do you see it evolving in the next few years with all the technological advancements? You have so much experience—how do you think Martech and your role will change in the near future?
Lukas Lunow: Yeah.
Lukas Lunow: You know, I think I for sure need to become… You know, I see myself as Mr. ExactTarget, you know. I know all the dirty tricks I can do on Marketing Cloud.
Lukas Lunow: But it is a technology. It’s a platform that is not native to Salesforce. It’s been acquired back then, and it’s been developed. It’s quite well integrated with the other clouds.
Lukas Lunow: But it’s really clear to see, especially after this year’s Dreamforce, that the future is revolving around Data Cloud. The future is revolving around Salesforce’s own technologies and technology stacks—Data Cloud, Sales Cloud, Service Cloud, and so on.
Lukas Lunow: I’ve seen this for well over a year now, that this is a transition I need to embrace. I love ExactTarget. I don’t want it to go away, but I also see myself that if I just stick to being fluent in ExactTarget and Salesforce Marketing Cloud, I will not be that relevant in maybe only 2 to 3 years from now.
Lukas Lunow: So, I’m really digging into all the other technologies, trying to understand Einstein, trying to stay on top of my certifications beyond what’s only relevant for Marketing Cloud. Because something like Integration Architect, which is a Salesforce core certification, talking about Bulk API, Apex callouts, and so on—well, suddenly, it might not just be a Sales or Service certification. It might also be relevant for marketing.
Lukas Lunow: So, I don’t want to be in a situation where I tell myself, “If I had only started studying with a broader perspective a year or two ago, I wouldn’t be in this dead-end street.”
Lukas Lunow: So, I really embrace ExactTarget and Marketing Cloud, but I also acknowledge that I probably will stick to the Salesforce ecosystem. I have too many connections. I have too much history there, so I don’t want to flush it out and suddenly become Adobe or Oracle or whoever. But I know I need to adapt to how the development is going now.
Anthony Lamot: Makes sense to me. I think the good news is that, especially from our Marketing Cloud engagement—so, ExactTarget—my forecast is we still have many years to come. Because it’s so much more deeply woven and so much more complex than anything else. For Pardot, these days called Marketing Cloud Account Engagement (mouthful), that will happen much, much faster. I think we’re actually already seeing that.
Anthony Lamot: And I’m sure even for Marketing Cloud Engagement, there will be some new features that become available on core. But I think we have a little bit more bandwidth. That said, us two are working very closely with Salesforce for our product lines’ segments—not so much because that’s a challenge very specific to ExactTarget and SQL—but Engage as a send frequency solution relevant for any marketing automation platform.
Anthony Lamot: So, I find it actually very exciting to see this development. I’ve seen demos. I’ve seen early access demos of features from Marketing Cloud on Data Cloud or Marketing Cloud on core—depends on who you talk with, you hear a different phrase—but in any case, the new Marketing Cloud products that are on core, I think are cool. It’s just very sharp. Some of the other layouts are a little bit dated. And, you know, there’s strong competition from HubSpot, and they’re very sharp and developing very fast. So, I think it’s a really good development for Salesforce to do this.
Anthony Lamot: But Lukas, I feel we could geek out about this probably for many hours, but we do need to round up this call soon. I just wanted to see if you have any advice for people just starting their career, or maybe for those who want to go more on the path of an architect. What would be some of your words of wisdom for them?
Lukas Lunow: Yeah. I think a good architect listens more than speaks. This is what I’m seeing both in the community and with people I meet. Going back to the Trailblazer community, I see a lot of questions where answers are just, “Oh, you need to do this and this.” But listen: what is it that this person is asking? How can I do this? But is that what you want to do? What do you want to achieve? Because achieving something might come through a different path than what you initially thought you wanted to do.
Lukas Lunow: So again, understanding the underlying problem, understanding the actual ambition, and not just solving a task—that’s really important. And also, you need to be a hybrid person.
Lukas Lunow: Good marketing architects (and I’m not saying Marketing Cloud architects but marketing architects) are unfortunately a very rare breed. You need to understand both marketing processes—why is it important what the email says, that we are relevant, that we have dynamic content that can adapt to what you’ve been browsing on the website—but also be able to speak with the tech people. What do you expect in your REST API call? Or how does this XML file look? It’s really a challenging span of competencies you need to possess.
Lukas Lunow: And I’m not saying that you should start reading up on everything at once. But if you are looking for a North Star vision, you should be capable of equally speaking with the CMO and the CIO, and actually be able to translate what each of them is saying so the other one can understand.
Anthony Lamot: I think that’s fantastic advice. Architect with the end goal in mind.
Anthony Lamot: Lukas, thank you so much for your time today, and thank you for coming on the show.
Lukas Lunow: Thank you, Anthony. Have a wonderful day.
Anthony Lamot: You too. Bye.
Discover how our platform instantly optimizes your Marketing Cloud
Anthony Lamot: Hey, Marty! Welcome to the show!
Martin Kihn: Hello! Great to be here.
Anthony Lamot: It’s such a pleasure to have you here. I’m really bummed out that I didn’t get to meet you in person at Connections. We kind of missed each other, but just for the occasion.
Martin Kihn: Oh, yes. Nice shirt. Yes.
Anthony Lamot: Thank you. For those who are only listening, not watching on Youtube, I’m wearing a Connections Hoodie, because it’s a great new line of swag that came out there.
Anthony Lamot: But today’s not about Connections; today is all about Martin Kihn. Marty, if I look back at your career, you know, starting from your early days in advertising to becoming SVP of Strategy at Salesforce, I’d be curious to learn about the key moments or decisions that significantly shaped your career path. Could you share that with me and the audience?
Martin Kihn: Yeah, I mean, it seems like a random career. At least, that’s what my mother thinks. But I started out, I wanted to be an actor. Actually. So I was a theater major. And then I came across the realization early on that I had no talent, and acting is actually a lot harder than it looks. You know people out there. It’s like golf. It looks so easy on television. But it’s actually really hard.
Martin Kihn: So at any rate, that didn’t work out. And I tried stand-up comedy. But, you know, I wanted to be a writer, basically. So I was, I was trying to, you know, get some background for being a writer. And I was actually professional. Right was a magazine writer in New York, for in the nineties. I wrote for a New York magazine, Forbes, I wrote for Gq. And I ended up at MTV. Writing for a television program that was well known in 1999, a pop-up video it was called. And it was basically there were bubbles on top of music videos with information.
Martin Kihn: And then, I was doing that one day, and I thought, you know, I’ll never be able to afford an apartment as a writer in New York. So I went to business school, and that that was the reason, more or less, you know, to be quite honest. But it it turned out when I came. When I, I like business school. I enjoyed it, and I graduated, and I became a management consultant.
Martin Kihn: And what I end up doing as a management consultant was PowerPoint decks, you know, it’s basically information on a slide. And then I was presenting it was very similar to working at pop-up video very similar to trying to be a standup comedian. So I think it’s related, you know, in a way, it’s storytelling and then I realized as a management consultant that that wasn’t really a good fit.
Martin Kihn: I wrote a book about that, and then I ended up in the ad business, and that was much better. I was a digitized. I was in digital advertising. I was doing measurement. And that was actually a really good fit, because there was a combination of the creative side and the analytical side which I have left brain, right brain, and then I ended up at I was recruited into Gartner, and I ended up at Salesforce, you know. It’s all. It’s all linear, in a way. I’ve had probably only four jobs since business school.
Martin Kihn: But they each one was a little better. And then this job is Salesforce. Very interesting. I get to present. I get to speak. I get to explain things. But I also, there’s an analytical component as well, cause it’s a software company. So.
Anthony Lamot: That’s amazing. You’ve been through so many different pathways in your career. But it’s interesting to see how they all come together now, and I can imagine that all of those skills at different phases in your life are to some extent useful. Now.
Martin Kihn: Well, the one I, you know, I’m a little embarrassed about the stand-up comedy crew because I never really got out of the open mic phase just a little above. But the good thing about that experience, and I recommend it to people. Try it, you know, or do improv or something, because now, when I present at a corporate event, no one will ever throw anything at me, you know no one will scream and and leave the room. It’ll never be as bad as my worst show as a comedian, so I don’t get nervous, you know. It’s it’s all. It’s actually very easy to do a corporate presentation. People are polite and well behaved, and so so that it’s a good training.
Anthony Lamot: Absolutely and what you said about that book that you wrote, I think is interesting. I was reminded by Bobby Gina, your CMO for Marketing Cloud, or the CMO for Marketing Cloud, that you wrote this pretty notorious book, I think, back at the day, and it it was kind of interesting, so Kate feels a bit more about that.
Martin Kihn: Yeah, I was. I was a management consultant in New York not in the media business. I wanted to be in the media business. But this was right after the like. 2001, there was a big recession like the market crashed the Nasdaq had had gone up Fivex during the dot-com boom, and it crashed so it was not a good time in business, so I ended up mostly consulting in the consumer healthcare space.
Martin Kihn: And I didn’t like consulting. I I thought that people were phoney. I I felt they were s trying to sound intelligent, but they weren’t, and I had a bad attitude. Essentially so. I wrote a book about it called House of Lies, and it was supposed to be a dictionary. It was like, con consulting to English dictionary cause I’m like, I’m gonna tell you how, if you’re taught, if you’re listening to your consultant, this is what they’re really saying, cause they try to sound smart, you know. They say, you know, leverage going forward, and, you know, push back, and all this stuff and
Martin Kihn: but they’re they’re not English words. They’re they’re the words that consultants use just to sound smart. So, anyway. Then it became a memoir, and then it came out, and consultants hated it, and but I was quitting anyway, so I didn’t care. But everyone was mad at me, and you know they were. They thought I was an evil man. And then, some years later, it was actually turned into a television program on Showtime starring. Don Cheadle. Don Cheadle plays a character. It’s called House of Lies.
Martin Kihn: Plays a character in Marty Khan is based on me, Marty Kihn. That’s my name, Marty Kihn. And when that show came out all of a sudden. Consultants love me, and I was like the most popular guy around, and they wanted me to go back to the reunion, and they forgot completely about how mean they were when the book came out. So like, that’s very interesting, you know. If you’re associated with Hollywood and show. Business people love you, but if you’re associated with like truth, telling and satire
Martin Kihn: and the written word, and people don’t. So I learned something.
Anthony Lamot: It’s a somewhat sad and cynical reflection on society as a whole, but I do.
Martin Kihn: And they’re superficial.
Anthony Lamot: Yes, yeah, it can be. It can be. And unfortunately, social media doesn’t always play well out there, either. I’ve definitely seen that a play out too in the consulting space where it can be somewhat pretense and and yeah, pretending you know it all, which you don’t always do, and I can say it is as a former consultant. Now, having said that I do have respect for certain consultants a lot, I do think they can be good
Anthony Lamot: central storages of knowledge because they have that unique opportunity to have exposure to certain problems more often than other people. But yes, there can be quite a bit of.
Martin Kihn: Well, no, I mean, in reality, there’s some very smart consultants, and some who are experts, and actually probably better than most practitioners. But I was. I was doing a satire. So it’s kind of skewed the other way. It’s comedy, you know.
Anthony Lamot: That makes sense. Yeah, I asked. You can always pull the comedy card there, I guess.
Martin Kihn: I guess so. Yeah.
Anthony Lamot: So you are also active on social media. I’ve been following you for quite a while, actually, and something I remember seeing was a post about Taylor Swift. I think this has been a while ago, might have been a year, even 2 years, so I wanted to ask you. Do you still consider Taylor Swift a master marketer, and are us 50.
Martin Kihn: Oh, yeah. Well, I’ve been accused of putting Taylor Swift into every one of my presentations every year, and it’s true. Unfortunately. I I really should move on.
Martin Kihn: But I started when I was a gardener, so I joined Salesforce almost 5 and a half years ago. We’ll say 2018. I think I was looking at Taylor Swift as a brand. I’m like, how is she so popular to so many different types of people as is possible, because she is, you know, universally beloved by all people on the left, people on the right, people in the North, people in the South and in Europe. And
Martin Kihn: so I did some research into her. And basically the the short story about that is that she she herself nobody really knows her, at least at that time she was a blank space. We were projecting ourselves onto her. So people saw in her basically more about themselves. So then I thought, well, that’s really genius brand marketing. Because if you can be the kind of brand that has
Martin Kihn: the definition sort of, but is flexible enough that people can see themselves in you. Then you have a much bigger audience. You can have it like a mass audience.
Martin Kihn: because people are ultimately quite selfish. So that’s what she does. Very well. And I I thought that was some. It’s just genius, and she’s even bigger now, you know, she’s just even she’s exploded since then. So.
Anthony Lamot: She’s extremely popular. What I think is interesting, though, that she managed to essentially be this kind of mirror. That’s what you’re saying, right? Just reflecting what our people project on her, whereas so much in branding and marketing is effective because it’s not that because it’s polarizing, a lot of things are very effective because you take a stand because you’re opinionated. And you know, you’re gonna
Anthony Lamot: lose out on some audience because of that. But the rest of the audience can be more engaged because of it.
Martin Kihn: Yeah, cause she she’s a mass brand, like she’s trying to get everybody, not every brand is that way. In fact, that’s not a smart way to be because it it takes an enormous amount of effort and time to do that. And
Martin Kihn: you know investment frankly. But if you’re like it, like Patagonia, for instance, is staked out of claim to Eco friendly. They’re gonna alienate people who are anti green. And there are people out there. That’s okay. They’re like, I’m gonna give up on those people. But I’m gonna really super. Serve the other audience. And that’s perfectly fine.
Anthony Lamot: What would you say? Is it that someone like Taylor Swift, and does to to avoid having to polarize people and still manage to get to capture so many bands.
Martin Kihn: Well, it’s the last year has been a little different cause. She’s she’s made hints politically. She’s sort of to the left, you know, which I value, but but she has alienated some people on the right in the US. Particularly cause we’re so polarized, and the other thing is the whole football thing. So I mean I that hasn’t hurt her career. I think. Now we know she’s a football fan, you know, big deal. So.
Martin Kihn: But she? She just never took a stand on anything. Historically, we didn’t know her opinion about anything to be honest until very recently, and she still doesn’t, really. She kind of hints she’s like, get out and vote. And you have to read between the lines like, Oh, maybe she’s liberal. I don’t know. Maybe. Yeah.
Martin Kihn: but that that’s what she does doesn’t take a stand.
Anthony Lamot: Gotcha. Well, beyond moving on beyond. Taylor. Can you tell us a bit more about a recent project or initiative at Salesforce that you’re particularly proud of, and why it stands out to you.
Martin Kihn: When I started in 2018, they hired me. I was hired by Bob Stuttz into Marketing Cloud in the product team like it was a role called product Strategy, which doesn’t exist and didn’t exist. Just me. But he hired me in, and it was like, well, I was a Gartner. I was looking at Marketing Clouds, and I started to cover this area called Customer Data Platforms, which was new. People talked about it a lot there. There wasn’t a lot of adoption at the time, but a lot of hype like an enormous amount.
Martin Kihn: So the question at Salesforce was, do we have a CDP, do we need to acquire one? Do we need to partner what is going on here? Basically in the marketing space? So I did. I did part of that analysis in the beginning, and my my thesis right away was no, we need we need to at least either acquire or build CDP. Cause you we don’t have it at Salesforce if CRM, it’s net new.
Martin Kihn: And so that was, you know, five and a half six years ago. There wasn’t an acquisition that made sense cause, as you may know, acquiring company and trying to bolt it on, can be more work than just building it from scratch and more difficult depending on the technology. So Brett Taylor Co. CEO at the time decided, you know. See, the CDP is so central to the enterprise. It’s like customer data
Martin Kihn: that we need to build it on the Salesforce platform, on CRM sales, cloud service cloud
Martin Kihn: Data Cloud. What’s now Data Cloud.
Martin Kihn: and that was a brilliant decision. But it it made us it made it take longer. There was like, Why is why is Salesforce so late to the CDP market. Well, the reason is because we were actually building a CD. We had a head start because we had the platform metadata and all that. But it took time. And now it’s three, three and a half years out. And Data Cloud is is huge. I mean, it’s a big product.
Martin Kihn: I I tried to do some research into. Is this the fastest growing software product ever taken on its own?
Martin Kihn: And the answer I got was, Yes, it is, but I can’t really prove it. So I you know, I
Martin Kihn: I don’t make that claim. But I hint that that’s the truth.
Martin Kihn: And I mean the fastest growing software product to, you know, 200,000,300. And beyond.
Anthony Lamot: Well, that’s of course, also because you guys already have such a tremendous portfolio of customers.
Martin Kihn: Yeah, we had advantages. Yeah, we’re not a startup. Yeah.
Anthony Lamot: Absolutely. I also think that something similar happened with Marketing Cloud. Maybe because I still believe Marketing Cloud has been your most successful acquisition in terms of return on investment.
Martin Kihn: Yeah, probably.
Anthony Lamot: Yeah.
Martin Kihn: Yeah, but I mean Marketing Cloud it it was I. I talked to a guy who was at Epsilon, Epsilon, competitor at the time of Marketing Cloud City email.
Martin Kihn: And the guy was like, well, we thought of exact target, which was the acquisition as a you know, pretty good competitor, but definitely not, you know, number one in the field, and but once Salesforce acquired it, it got into the jet stream of the the sales channels it just took off. And so there, there’s a real advantage to being part of the Salesforce kinda sales machine. And I know up on the inside it’s a machine. I mean, they are very disciplined.
Martin Kihn: So you know, that helped.
Anthony Lamot: Absolutely. I’d be curious to learn if you still think Data Cloud to be a CDP, and I’ll you know, justify that question. So I remember initially, when you guys surveyed your customers about, you know what CDPs are using, they answered, oh, we’re using you. Whereas you guys didn’t even have a CDP. As you point out yourself. It was a CRM so clearly there was a lot of confusion market about what a CDP should be, and I I know it. Go went back to an initial white paper, I think back in 2016. It was also a major fast-moving consumer goods company out there that that sent out an RFP for that that triggered a lot of stuff but you guys did start building it.
Anthony Lamot: But over time the name has changed a lot which has, let’s be honest, a bit of a mixed response in the ecosystem. But today, it’s called Data Cloud. And it almost seems that it does more than what a CDP does. That’s what some people have suggested. So I’m kinda curious, especially given your role especially given your history. What’s your take on that? How do you think about Data Cloud? Is it a CDP, is it something else? Is it more than a CDP.
Martin Kihn: It’s I mean, it’s hard to say. An analogy would be CRM, you know the CRM space. So that’s customer relationship management. It appeared in like the nineties, and Gartner in particular, was a champion of CRM.
Martin Kihn: And then CRM became CRM for Sales CRM for service, CRM for field service CRM, for I don’t know medical devices in China, whatever there’s now, there’s oh, probably 3 or 400 different.
Martin Kihn: many categories of CRM. And so Gartner doesn’t even have a magic quadrant for customer relationship management. It’s too many different things. I thought from the beginning CDP would be the same. It’s you know, it’s customer data. It’s so core to the enterprise that it’s going to be adapted to whatever the enterprise is.
Martin Kihn: So it’s not a. It has certain characteristics.
Martin Kihn: and the CDP Institute has done a nice job of defining what those are. But even those characteristics are changing. But one of them, for instance, from the beginning. David Rob, he actually invented the CDP category.
Martin Kihn: It wasn’t me. Someone’s asked me if I did. It was David, ROM. 2013. But, he said, one of the main, you know requirements of a CDP is that it has its own database, that is, you know, you ingest data into it and it stores data.
Martin Kihn: And but now he’s saying, well, actually, there are things he might call a CDP that don’t do that. The so-called composable CDP, where the database is the Data Cloud. It might be Snowflake, or whatever.
Martin Kihn: But is that a CDP or is it not? It might do all the other things, but the data sitting in the in the cloud, it seems to me it probably is a CDP. But it doesn’t fit the definition of a CDP.
Martin Kihn: So to answer your question, my roundabout way is saying, I would say, Data Cloud is not a CDP. It would answer a CDP RFP. But it does more, and its ambition is to do more. And the most important part of that is that it serves the entire customer experience from end to end, from acquisition, through loyalty, through commerce, through service, through sales
Martin Kihn: and marketing, by the way and marketing, but not just marketing. So it’s more ambitious Data Cloud.
Anthony Lamot: Absolutely and naturally, we are very interested in the marketing piece. I see what’s gonna happen with Marketing Cloud Growth for us is very interesting cause. It opens a whole array of possibilities as a software vendor to but maybe before we go there you mentioned Gartner? A few times in passing that. And obviously, you, you know, it was a big part of your career, too.
Anthony Lamot: You guys have recently been named a leader the leader actually in on the quadrant for for a CDP. So congratulations, 1st off, and and secondly, I wanted to ask, like, how important is that relationship with Gardner, and and what effect does it have? On the market? From your point of view.
Martin Kihn: Well, it. This is. This. Evaluation was particularly important.
Martin Kihn: and I think it was important because it was the first major analyst firm that had done an evaluation like a detailed, careful evaluation of the CDP market, and it included most of the actually all of the companies that we would consider major competitors in the CDP space adobe segment teleium.
Martin Kihn: and there were a number of them almost 20. So this was the first evaluation. We took it very seriously. And, in fact, if you saw the questionnaire and the requirements it was. It was a lot of work. They asked for 10 customer references, you know, all of these vendors had to come up with 10 people who would would talk to an analyst.
Martin Kihn: and you know the questionnaire itself was was voluminous. So it was. It was more work than the typical magic Quadrant.
Martin Kihn: We were hopeful. I thought I thought we’d be a leader for sure. We did, really? Well, and I think that that’s just a Testament to. I think a lot of it is the vision like how we articulated where we’re going, and it’s related to the customer experience end and CX.
Martin Kihn: But we did. We came out, you know, highest on both axes. It was and in terms of the response to the market. It’s been very. It’s been very helpful. There been. There were a lot of RFPs in the past where we were up against another CDP. Who was making claims that may or may not have been true. And we’re making different claims that are, of course, all true, but the buyer would have a hard time assessing, you know, who’s telling true. So they want to do a POC. And this just helps. We can say, well, look, here’s an independent source that says that validates some of our claims.
Anthony Lamot: So super interesting. And also given your role. Given your history and the different positions you’ve had to look at the market. I’ll be interested as a software partner to Salesforce. Where do you think could be the opportunity? And maybe, if it’s if it’s too good of an opportunity, you can tell me after the interview after the recording, so other people won’t hear it. But.
Martin Kihn: Yeah. Well, I mean there as a partner.
Martin Kihn: there are things that Salesforce doesn’t do. This isn’t helpful to you, maybe. But like, for instance, we don’t sell data.
Martin Kihn: People are surprised to hear that we actually don’t sell data. And then we don’t sell media.
Martin Kihn: But these are things that users of Data Cloud want to do. They? Wanna, you know, do ad campaigns. And they, wanna you know, append data onto this onto their customer records and their account records. So we have
Martin Kihn: successful partners in those areas. Media partners, we’re a major source of demand for some of the so-called walled gardens and that’s the way you can activate 1st party data and an advertising contact. So you send it over to Facebook and Instagram and Google and Amazon. And those guys are working with us very closely. And we have good connections with them. We send them a lot of, you know business, basically. And so they’re very good partners on the ad side. And then on the data side, we have dense su, we have axiom. And the the, you know, the usual suspects. But they are. We have Co customers with them a lot, so that there’s that area. And then there are
Martin Kihn: there are other areas like the emerging AI space. We we wanna support AI, we have AI features. But I think that most of the user Data Cloud can think of it as source of data repository of data. And you can apply all kinds of stuff to that data. And one of it might be verticalized AI models. And so I think there’s an ecosystem of partners that are arising in that area to use the data and Data Cloud and kind of extend it in different ways.
Martin Kihn: And then, of course, on the Si, the partnership side, we we’re not really a services firm. We have some services just to help the products. But we are very supportive of. And you see, most of the sponsors of connections were actually firms, you know, services firms.
Martin Kihn: Sis, and agencies. Yeah. Actually, McKinsey was a big sponsor of the CMO events. So I take back everything I said about consultants earlier. It doesn’t apply to them.
Martin Kihn: I mean, they recognize, you know CDP is CDP is not, it’s not all about marketing. It’s about the enterprise, and it’s it’s it’s a major kind of C-suite decision. And it, it would involve a lot of kind of high level thinking and strategy. And so I think everyone recognizes that.
Anthony Lamot: Absolutely. And if you, if you take a step back and look at the market ecosystem as a whole you know, just recently the the the next the latest market landscape publication was done. It just keeps baffling. My, how many more solutions there are! How many more vendors there are, and sure there is, some consolidation, but there’s also still more proliferation so how do you think it will evolve over the next 5 years. And, of course, what role do you envision salesforce playing and shaping that future.
Martin Kihn: I mean, there won’t be–there’ll be acquisitions, you know, because acquisitions, I always think of that when a big strategic acquirer and salesforce has done this not so much recently, but you know it’s it’s almost like there’s R&D done in the market. And so this startup these kind of scrappy startup will appear doing something.and it will succeed.
Martin Kihn: And so then it gets the notice of a big strategic acquirer, and so they’ll acquire it bring it on. So they’re bringing on the talent, the technology. So in a way, it’s been market tested so that there’s that kind of acquisition. And that will always happen. There’ll always be people with good ideas that will get acquired. But I don’t think that will lead to any consolidation. There will always be more and more and more and more more Logos. And the reason is simple. Scott Brinker said it. He’s like who complains about. You know too much choice in the Itunes store, you know, in the app store. Nobody, I mean. You may not like most of it, but you’re not gonna complain that you have to, you know. Too much choice. Oh, it’s overwhelming. Maybe somebody would. But but that’s not how it works.
Martin Kihn: You basically want more is more because you have more choice. And with Salesforce’s role, I mean, I think, that the acquisitions that Salesforce makes over over the years have become bigger. So and there’s still there are below the radar. There are smaller ones, particularly in the in the analytics, and the AI space have been a bunch of little ones but our plugins like there’ll be companies that will be on the AppExchange, that kind of reach, critical mass. And we realize it would actually could fold in nicely because it already works with a lot of customers.
Martin Kihn: And but they’re the big ones. And these are kind of big strategic investments like Mulesoft and Tableau and Slack, which was enormous. $27,000,000,000 at the time. And so I think going forward, Salesforce’s role will be to make some of those not very many, very carefully. What they’ll be I don’t know. They didn’t tell me. And then these other ones folding in, you know. But I think that probably the the path to success with Salesforce is to have joint customers and to have customers who are using us together.
Martin Kihn: And so that’s when the acquisitions make the most sense.
Anthony Lamot: Absolutely so. It needs to be some prerogative and need to be some track record and history and just good collaboration. I would assume.
Anthony Lamot: I also think that something similar happened with Marketing Cloud. Maybe because I still believe Marketing Cloud has been your most successful acquisition in terms of return on investment.
Martin Kihn: Yeah, and proof that it works together. It’s like, well, velocity is a good example that was like a verticalization of snow, of Salesforce. You know, it was built on Salesforce, basically. And so it made a lot of sense. We would acquire velocity. So now we get of industry clouds.
Martin Kihn: Yeah, but I mean Marketing Cloud it it was I. I talked to a guy who was at Epsilon, Epsilon, competitor at the time of Marketing Cloud City email.
Martin Kihn: And the guy was like, well, we thought of ExactTarget, which was the acquisition as a you know, pretty good competitor, but definitely not, you know, number one in the field, and but once Salesforce acquired it, it got into the jet stream of the the sales channels it just took off. And so there, there’s a real advantage to being part of the Salesforce kinda sales machine. And I know up on the inside it’s a machine. I mean, they are very disciplined.
Martin Kihn: So you know, that helped.
Anthony Lamot: Absolutely so. So, going from the market landscape as a whole is zooming again on Marketing Cloud. Specifically, what would you say? Our sales, forces, goals, what we can share? In terms of goals for market cloud, specifically in the next few years. And and how might they transform customer interactions.
Martin Kihn: Well, I think Marketing Cloud is you know, it’s a successful product. It’s a growing product. I think that it’s from the inside of Salesforce our goal.
Martin Kihn: particularly since I joined. I don’t give myself credit for this. I think the vision has been there.
Martin Kihn: But actually, Steve Fisher get the he’s our kind of product strategist he was. He’s a friend of Mark Benioff. So we was hired probably 3 years ago or so he worked at ebay. He was retired, and Mark kind of brought him in out of retirement.
Martin Kihn: Brilliant man, you know, and he’s a strategic thinker. But his point was, you know, we need to make everything we need to take all of these applications and break them down into services and build them all on the same platform, you know. So basically, that’s a big effort behind the scenes. We are in the process of kind of decomposing the applications, including exact target and into its components and then putting them on Salesforce platform, which is, you know, hyperforce and then Data Cloud. Now is the data layer, and then the analytics services. The other like flow services on top of that. And the reason to do that is just so that the clouds, the clouds, which will always exist work better together.
Martin Kihn: So that you know you can do things in the same way through the same UI and marketing and service. So then your marketing service teams basically can serve the customer in a way that’s kind of invisible to the customer. That’s the goal. So I think ultimately, you know, it’s a year, and we’re on a journey. Year by year you saw Marketing Cloud Growth Edition, which was kind of a mini version of Marketing Cloud which was built on our platform that use flow instead of Journey Builder.
Martin Kihn: So that is a taste of you know where we’re going, I think in the long run the customer shouldn’t notice it, they should just notice, it works better but behind the scenes things will be changing.
Anthony Lamot: Absolutely, and I think it’s a really exciting change, and it’ll be helpful. And, as I mentioned, we also consider as as I mentioned before. In other places we consider Marketing Cloud grow like super interesting, because it’s yeah. It present. It presented itself a new opportunity for us to
Anthony Lamot: in those shorter term, even because it does address more SMB needs. That’s how it’s positioned. But in the longer term beyond that, I think as well
Martin Kihn: We also wanted to, because there’s companies out there with product-led growth, you know. Think of Hubspot, so you can sign up for Hubspot as a relatively small business, and it’s easy, and then you grow with them. So then, when you become big, you know, if you become big, then you’re still a Hubspot customer, so we wanted to make that it wasn’t so easy with Salesforce. We were expensive. We were large, we were. You had to call the salesperson
Martin Kihn: couldn’t use your credit card, so we wanted to make it easy to have an entry and then grow.
Anthony Lamot: Yes, absolutely. And we’re also huge fans of PLG and product-led growth. So for for those who don’t know what that is, it’s usually something like a premium model where people get to try your product for free for a while or indefinitely, but at the limited usage. And then basically, you get hooked, and you start using the product more and more until you take out a credit card or or whatever and so we’ve we kind of have done that always because we have made this free plugin called DESelect Search for the Marketing Cloud. A. That’s a search part to it.
Anthony Lamot: although I would typically think more of it as a lead magnet. But it’s been a tremendous lead magnet for us. But we’ve actually also started to create a free version of our segmentation solution for the Marketing Cloud.
Anthony Lamot: DESelect Segment, so people can now install it for free and and and work with it. And and it’s interesting. It does take a lot more work and discipline, I would say then, as as a SaaS company initially think of, because there are no services, there is no support. There’s no training like the product needs to be
Anthony Lamot: like super self explanatory and and and the learning portals, and whatever needs to be really there. So there’s definitely been a journey for us to to, to appreciate that.
Martin Kihn: That’s a good point. You can’t do. Hand holding. It’s too expensive, so has to be intuitive. Yeah.
Anthony Lamot: Exactly. There’s also a growing emphasis, emphasis. Excuse me on on 0 party data and and gaining traction. How is Salesforce equipping marketers to effectively collect and utilize zero-party data within Data Cloud and Marketing Cloud.
Martin Kihn: Yeah, I mean zero party. I mean, it was zero party. And first party, I mean, first party CRM is mostly all first-party data. So that’s it’s not new to Salesforce. Zero-party would be. You know, you’re trying to collect it from customers actively. I think that in the past four years there’s been a lot more interest in that. It’s been almost a. There’s been a sense of urgency that kind of at times felt like panic that
Martin Kihn: customers didn’t have enough first-party data, and particularly in the consumer product area, where traditionally, they they don’t have direct relationships with customers. And
Martin Kihn: and these are big companies, you know, and and a lot of them were quite concerned. And then they were concerned about the regulatory and our our answer to all of that is it. It will be different for every company. Some, you know, in a in every case going forward without third-party cookies. Someone will have to have first-party data
Martin Kihn: it. It’s either you or you can. You can use a like a retail network, or you can use the walled gardens or so there, but someone out there. And you see so many know that retail media networks appearing, which are basically companies like Uber, that have, or Marriott that have first-party data, and they’re just making it available, you know, for advert. You can rent it essentially to do targeting.
Martin Kihn: But zero-party data is important, and I think that we made the acquisition of Evergage few years ago, which is a personalization platform and it what it does, is it in the session? It will make the experience more relevant. And it ultimately, it’s trying to get people to engage with the website, with the app.
Martin Kihn: That’s what it does is personalization platform. And a lot of that is about trying to get them to give them enough value that they give you an email or some kind of first-party data so that you can build a relationship with them in a profile. And that that’s that was very popular. You know, it’s it’s been a very successful product for us personalization.
Martin Kihn: It’s getting closer and closer to Data Cloud because they’re related the data that’s collected. And the personalization needs to reside. We hope in Data Cloud ultimately.
Martin Kihn: And so you can. You know, it’s gives you a more complete picture, because I think that early in the journey you don’t know somebody. So you’re using a first-party cookie or nothing.
Martin Kihn: and you’re just trying to personalize, based on behavior in that session. And then, as you, as you get their email and you get a deeper relationship, you get a better profile of them over time. And that deeper profile is something that should reside in Data Cloud. Ultimately.
Anthony Lamot: Seen it firsthand at some larger implementation projects where
Anthony Lamot: the prevailing IT and marketing leaders had the initial inclination to use sort of legacy data from older ERP systems to do their marketing campaigns for their brand new marketing automation platform of choice. The customer I’m thinking about right now was using at the time. So name part of it now, Marketing Cloud Account Engagement.
Anthony Lamot: And from what I’ve seen, that just doesn’t work because all of the data is super outdated. There might be a massive disconnect between the people who generate those lists and the marketing teams. So you really want to get this sort of actual constantly updated stream of data of based on how customers really engage with your brand to drive your marketing from. From what I can tell.
Martin Kihn: It’s true. I mean, there are some characteristics that don’t change much over time, but not very many.
Martin Kihn: I mean, I’m always. I’ll always. I’m a male, you know, so I guess I’d be buying men’s clothing so that won’t change. But, on the other hand, the most important determinants of a of purchase are things that are in the moment a lot of it is, how much time do I have to decide? So that kind of stress factor.
Martin Kihn: What up? What’s what do I need right then? Like, what am I actually literally looking for? Am I looking for credit card or or home loan, and you wouldn’t know that unless you’re observing me in that session, or you, you learned it somehow. But that that’s the most. That’s the most important information. And then the other stuff. That kind of doesn’t decay over time is less important. It’s also most likely to be known by your competitors. So it’s less differentiated as well.
Anthony Lamot: That’s a good point on the competitive side. So it’s almost as if the ability to capture real-time engagement and and buy intention whether it’s in B to C or B to B, is super important. I also see it in my business, after all, right? So finding out what could be the ideal customer. And ICP is really important, especially for our own outbound strategy, which we do have.
Anthony Lamot: but being able to surface buyer signals, even if anything beyond the obvious hey, giving me a demo is also really important to get to be successful.
Martin Kihn: Yeah, that I mean, there’s even data about where someone is having an impact on their purchase it like, are they outside or in the office. They’re different kind of mindsets.
Martin Kihn: So there’s all sorts of information that you could. If you have it, you can do much better marketing.
Anthony Lamot: Absolutely.
Martin Kihn: You have to collect it. Telemetry.
Anthony Lamot: Have to collect them, for sure.
Anthony Lamot: And there’s another important term with zero in it that I wanna address because it’s a more recent announcement from Salesforce. And it has to do with Zero Copy Data.
Anthony Lamot: Of course. So which is not to be confused with the thing we’ve just discussed. So can you please elaborate on what it means, and explain to our audience.
Martin Kihn: Well, it’s highly related to Snowflake in particular cause. They developed a technology number of years ago people and underestimated it actually. But it was. It’s an ability to it’s, it’s very advanced technology. But now it’s widely used. But basically, it’s ability to have data, two data stores. You can have more than two. But as an example, two, you have Data Cloud. And then you have data in Snowflake.
Martin Kihn: and you can literally access data and Data Cloud or the data in Snowflake either way without moving it. So when I say access, it means, you know what’s there. You have visibility into it, and if you do a query, you can use the data that’s sitting in this other database. But you’re not lifting it and shifting it into the new environment which saves a lot of time and effort and money. You know.
Martin Kihn: computational costs and all that. So it’s very useful. And it also helps in terms of data discipline. There’s information that you’d want to reside in the cloud. All your product data, maybe a transaction data
Martin Kihn: in Snowflake or in Databricks or BigQuery. And then in Data Cloud, you have other information about customers, but maybe not all your product information. But you’d want to know some of the product information if you make recommendations about products. So it’s relevant.
Martin Kihn: But you don’t want it all. So it’s it’s a way to kind of connect. And it’s it’s just gonna get more and more rel, more and more prevalent to the point where maybe in the future there won’t. There won’t be any databases. It’ll all be this kind of virtualized environment where where data sitting in hundreds and thousands of different places. But it’s all available centrally.
Martin Kihn: Who knows but.
Anthony Lamot: So you just have an application layer that taps into these data lakes using zero copy in that sense that it will be kind of funny if for some customers, not for all. If for some customers, Data Cloud gets to be used as a composable CDP, because it could be possible.
Martin Kihn: Could be, yeah.
Anthony Lamot: Figure.
Martin Kihn: I mean, we compete with composable CDPs, and they say frankly untrue things about us. There’s one recently that said, there are there. We? We make copies. It’s not zero copy, which is not true. It it’s it is zero copy. It’s also zero ETL. But I mean, you can make a copy. Then sometimes there’s an advantage to making a copy. So but you you can. You can use Data Cloud. I mean, we don’t describe it as composable CDP, but you can do composable use cases like you can have data sitting in your in your data warehouse and still use segmentation in the Data Cloud. So that’s sort of proposal.
Anthony Lamot: Very interesting, would you? Is there an example that you have in mind when you say that there could be advantages to storing or not storing the data. I think it could just make it a little bit more concrete for the people who are listening.
Martin Kihn: Oh, yeah, definitely. Well, like for instance, in
Martin Kihn: in Snowflake, Snowflake is is. And I keep using them as an example. But it could be Databricks. It could be BigQuery, you could. You could have, you know, all of your transactional data
Martin Kihn: like every single transaction that’s made in all of your stores and all of your place, all of your online areas. And some of it is connected to an individual, maybe through a loyalty program. So there’s a person label on it. Some of it isn’t.
Martin Kihn: But you wouldn’t necessarily want all of that to be copied and transported into Data Cloud. If you’re a big retailer, you might have millions and millions of records, even billions in a couple of months.
Martin Kihn: And does that belong in Data Cloud? It’s still relevant cause. I want to do a recommendation or even segmentation based on the products someone has bought.
Martin Kihn: you know, in the past, or even trends in their product purchase, so that might be relevant to I put them in this segment or I wanna, make a product recommendation based on purchases that made recently. And I want it to be exhaustive. I wanted to include all the stuff that they did offline. I wanna stuff that’s done online. So I want access to the purchase data. But I don’t. I don’t. Doesn’t make sense for me personally to store it all in Data Cloud. So this zero copy is is a way to make that happen.
Martin Kihn: you know, to make that feasible in a way. And in the past it would have been, but it
Martin Kihn: transporting. There’s a lot of costs involved if people will know in it. People in marketing don’t realize this. But there’s there’s a lot of expense involved in anything where you transform data, computational expense or store data, there’s a storage expense, believe it or not. And then moving data is both storage and a computational expense. So it’s. And also you introduce risk. There’s always mistakes that happen. You know, things that aren’t copied right? Or there’s errors that are introduced.
Martin Kihn: And then there’s also a time lag. It doesn’t happen instantly. So then you have a later copy of the data sitting over here doesn’t sync.
Martin Kihn: So there’s issues with copying always.
Anthony Lamot: Yeah, thank you. Appreciate you. Elaborating on that example makes a little bit more concrete, I think, for for people who are not as familiar with these technologies yet. We’re getting close to having to run up this really interesting conversation. But one thing I wanted to ask you is, what advice would you give to aspiring more tech leaders want to make a significant impact in the industry and specific skills? Maybe a mindset concepts frameworks that you think are really crucial these days.
Martin Kihn: I mean, I always think that in conversations I have with people who are, you know, like myself, farther along their career. Looking back, and I think it’s good to have technical knowledge. Now, you don’t need to have a PhD. Or be a master’s or anything like that. But it is like, if you’re in an analytical area, you know, take a class in python and actually do coding
Martin Kihn: or SQL. Or even though you think computers will be doing it. It’s not important, the this, the whole exercise of learning how to do this, to think how to do it, to be structured will really help.
Martin Kihn: and I found, like I did a sequel boot camp. I didn’t know any sequel, and I did that. I don’t do it. I don’t use it in my job.
Martin Kihn: But I can ask more intelligent questions. I can understand things more concretely, and it’s all because I kind of know how that works. In a way, I’m not an expert. No one would hire me to write sequel for them, but, on the other hand, I don’t know nothing, so I think that’s always very helpful. Any anything, actually, especially with AI. Now, you know, get to figure out how it works. I mean.
Martin Kihn: it’s not that hard.
Anthony Lamot: I actually love that answer because I I studied psychology and I went into consulting whoops kidding, but along the way I taught myself how to code, and it indirectly led me to to the founding of my company, because if I hadn’t understood the technologies that I taught myself how to use, I would never have been able to come up with the idea. And today I don’t code at all. But it’s been a while since I did, but I did at the start. But
Anthony Lamot: again, if I hadn’t learned the technical skills I wouldn’t have been able to see the solution, even though I am more on the quote, unquote business side. So I love that answer. Marty, it’s been such a pleasure. Such an interesting conversation. Where can people connect with you? Where can I follow you and find you?
Martin Kihn: Well, I’m you can reach me at Salesforce, m.kihn@salesforce. I have a website martinkihn.com.
Martin Kihn: and yeah, Linkedin. Happy to help. Talk about Data Cloud, yeah.
Anthony Lamot: Absolutely. Absolutely. We’ll make sure to add those handles in the description, too, of the interview. And yeah, once again, thank you so much for being on the show, and hope to see in the future.
Martin Kihn: Thank you. Thanks, Anthony.
Discover how our platform instantly optimizes your Marketing Cloud
Anthony Lamot: Hey, Pato! Welcome to the show!
Pato Sapir: Hey, Anthony, thank you so much for having me.
Anthony Lamot: It’s an absolute pleasure. It’s very exciting for me to have the creator of the networking app for Dreamforce itself here on the show. So, thank you for making time. Pato! You’ve had a very interesting career. Can you share a little bit with our audience what your career has looked up to this point, and what drove you to establish Devs United?
Pato Sapir: Yeah, sure. So I started, I mean my career, I started when I was 18 years old working in software development, doing mobile apps for airports, mostly before the iPhone, just like pocket PC and handheld type things. So I learned a lot of like C and C there and then I started working on digital marketing in 2007, going into web development there. And then fast forward and moved to the US. I’m originally from Argentina and moved to the US. Still working as a web developer, a little bit of mobile app development. And then in 2012, I started working for a company that worked on projects with ExactTarget. So I served as a technical architect doing projects with the ExactTarget team, a lot of experience that I got there and then in 2015 I decided that it was time for me. I had accumulated a lot of experience in different areas of business, I guess, in my journey. So I thought maybe I want to try doing it on my own, so I decided to leave where I was working at and start my own consulting or professional services organization focused on Salesforce Marketing Cloud. And that’s how Devs United pretty much started.
Anthony Lamot: That’s so cool and clearly, you’ve worn many hats. So I’m kind of curious. What do you mostly enjoy doing nowadays?
Pato Sapir: Yeah. So I wore many, many hats. In 2019, we actually got acquired. So we are, you know, part of a bigger advertising agency here in Ohio. So that allowed me to kind of like, choose a little more what I wanted to focus on versus wearing too many hats. So now, mostly, what I enjoy doing is consulting, you know, just helping clients realize their strategy for implementing Salesforce and adjust it to their goals and use cases. And then while I am a coder by trade, I really love exploring that and finding creative solutions with code. So in my free time I develop. Well, the networking app for Salesforce was a joint effort with another trailblazer, Anthony Zupancic, and then developed MC Snippets, which is a playground to code in AMPScript or SSJS and SQL without the need of a Marketing Cloud environment. So I’ve been spending most time just adding features to it and making it nicer and cooler for the community.
Anthony Lamot: That’s great. Let’s talk a bit more about Marketing Cloud specifically, in the projects you’ve done. What would you say is your most or one of your most interesting projects to date?
Pato Sapir: That’s a question. I’ve definitely done a ton of interesting projects. I would say the most interesting ones have to do with integrations and thinking outside of the box a little bit. One that I can remember is we did this integration for a company that sold apparel for different teams in the MLB, NHL, and NBA. We integrated with sports statistics API, and we basically monitored the outcome of a game. Based on the outcome of a game, we could trigger an email within seconds to the people subscribed to receive news about the team to promote and capitalize on those micro moments of excitement. For example, if your team won, we’d send an email saying, “Hey, we have a sale on jerseys for this player,” and we could even track the most scoring player to personalize the message more. I would say that was a really fun project to work on.
Anthony Lamot: Yup, sounds like it. And being from Argentina, I can imagine that you really like football, slash soccer yourself as well.
Pato Sapir: I do. I really do love football.
Anthony Lamot: That’s great. Well, this might have been one of your more interesting and fun projects, but I would like to dive into the challenges as well. What do you see most often as the biggest challenge or challenges that Marketing Cloud admins face when they are onboarding teams for the first time?
Pato Sapir: I think one of the greatest strengths of Marketing Cloud is the number of ways you can solve a problem, but at the same time, it can be overwhelming because you have too many ways to solve one problem. The main challenge is defining the set of best practices and how you’re going to teach people how to use the platform. Creating a path for adoption and learning based on industry standards and your own company’s way of doing things, tailored to the audience, is crucial. Ensuring that users adopt the platform and know how to use it is a big challenge.
Anthony Lamot: And so you’ve already highlighted the specific standards that might apply within your company. Now, throughout an implementation project, the onboarding, and even the support afterward, there’s usually some form of collaboration needed between the more marketing/business side and the more technical teams. What are some of the best practices, tips, and tricks you can give for collaborating between these two sides?
Pato Sapir: Aligning first on what success looks like, which has nothing to do with the technology or the marketing strategies, is crucial. Sitting down with the team and mapping out the use cases we want to solve for our customers and organizational goals is important. Understanding each other’s KPIs, indicators, and motivations helps. It’s also important to recognize past challenges, as IT might want to control certain aspects based on previous experiences. Getting alignment on organizational and departmental goals and use cases is key. When challenges arise, they come from a place of understanding where the other team is coming from.
Anthony Lamot: Absolutely. And it’s actually very recognizable to me as well. We also try to set very clear success criteria or map out the use cases when we start working with our clients. I’m curious if you ever also see some alignment around KPIs, even if the marketers themselves are typically held up to things like engagement metrics or marketing-generated revenue. Sometimes technical marketers or IT are indirectly responsible for enabling these. Is that something you have seen in projects?
Pato Sapir: Yes, I think so. From the IT side, usually what’s thrown is technical debt. It’s not a measurement or a KPI, but it’s more like a consequence. I think what I see is more behaviors or standards that need to be followed, like keeping a log of all active journeys and automations, storing important code in repositories, and documenting functionality. These practices ultimately affect the bottom line, as reworking functionality can delay new campaigns and impact organizational goals.
Anthony Lamot: Absolutely. And I think it’s really interesting where you highlight the importance of avoiding technical debt and how automations running without being useful can impact performance. Let’s talk about the biggest challenge in the Marketing Cloud community that nobody is talking about.
Pato Sapir: I think learning continues to be the biggest challenge, partly due to the lack of access to tools for trial and error. Unless you pay for a license, it’s hard to learn Marketing Cloud. This was one of my motivations for creating MC Snippets, to give developers a way to learn. I would also like to see more content around strategy, like mapping out use cases and journey experiences, rather than just technical how-tos.
Anthony Lamot: Absolutely. What do you think are some of the best topics to follow in the Marketing Cloud ecosystem? What’s developing rapidly and interesting to follow?
Pato Sapir: I love seeing new perspectives and documentation on solving issues, like activating audiences from Data Cloud or extending the platform with WhatsApp. Seeing new faces contributing to the community with content, like mini-courses on SQL or using WhatsApp, excites me.
Anthony Lamot: That’s really nice to hear. Specifically, do you have thoughts on the recent announcement for the Marketing Cloud Growth edition?
Pato Sapir: It’s exciting that Salesforce is taking steps to unify the experience in one core platform, especially with Data Cloud. However, it seems like it will take a long time for Marketing Cloud Growth to match what Marketing Cloud Engagement can do. There are many steps to implement it, like setting up Data Cloud and updating permissions, which makes it feel like an initial MVP. I’d like to see a roadmap at Connections to understand where it’s headed.
Anthony Lamot: For sure. It’s always interesting to see how new products pan out. Lastly, what advice would you give to new marketers or trailblazers in the ecosystem?
Pato Sapir: Find support in the community. Connect with trailblazers, attend events, and join community groups. Don’t wait for a client project to get hands-on experience. Create your own use cases and practice on the platform. Making mistakes is the best way to learn.
Anthony Lamot: I totally agree. Getting your hands dirty is essential, especially with complex marketing automation. It’s often underestimated how complex it is. Pato, it’s been super interesting. Can’t wait to meet you again at some Salesforce events. Thank you for being on the show.
Pato Sapir: Awesome. Thanks, Anthony. See you soon.
Discover how our platform instantly optimizes your Marketing Cloud
Anthony Lamot: Hi, Andrea. Welcome to the show.
Andrea Tarrell: Thanks for having me.
Anthony: It’s such a pleasure, especially given our ongoing collaboration. I think it will be really interesting for the audience to get an idea of who Andrea is. Would you mind walking us through your journey so far in your career?
Andrea: Yeah, absolutely. So, it’s been kind of a winding road to get here. In school, I studied political science and Spanish literature, originally had aspirations of working for the government or working in politics or something like that, but decided to get into marketing communications right out of school. So, I started out kind of as more of a content marketer, marketing generalist, but stumbled into the Salesforce ecosystem when one of our VPS of sales came to me and said “we have this thing called Salesforce. Some guys put it on his credit card. Now, we have 30 licenses all of a sudden, like we really need to just figure out what this is and what we can do with it, and we’ll send you to Dreamforce if you can learn it, get trained on it, figure out like how to make this work for our business. Are you willing to try to that?” And at the time, I didn’t know what Salesforce was either, but I heard free trip to San Francisco, but I’ve never been to California. So I was like, “yeah, sign me up!” I will be our new Salesforce admin, and just totally like during the cool, at that Dreamforce, I learned about marketing automation for the first time. So Marketo, Hubspot, Pardot, we’re all sponsors of that Dreamforce. So I became familiar with their products. And then… I’ve never looked back basically. So I came back implemented Salesforce. We had Hubspot at the time and we implemented Pardot. In addition to that, the two tools at the time were not as similar as they are today. But yeah, that was kind of how I got my start in the ecosystem.
Anthony: Well, it’s interesting too that back then Hubspot and Marketo are still, so, you know, represented that at Dreamforce. I’m guessing was this before the acquisition of ExactTarget, which later became Marketing Cloud?
Andrea: Yes. Yeah. It was like two, two years before that actually.
Anthony: Yeah, it was a very different world back then, so that’s super interesting. And could you tell us how that experience led you to founding Sercante?
Andrea: Yeah. So in that role, I became really in tune with what sales users needed, what marketing teams needed at the time. I was the only marketer but grew that to a team of, I think it was four or five people when I left… and just kinda got in touch with sort of like, the revenue operations needs. And then from there, I went to go work at a digital marketing agency for a bit and worked at a Salesforce consultancy for a bit. And I just realized that like the services that I needed when I was client side in that kind of rev ops space, I just couldn’t find a partner that brought that to the table. Marketing agencies brought creative, they brought strategy, but oftentimes like as soon as we started talking about Salesforce and what happened when a lead converted to an opportunity that just wasn’t really their wheelhouse to consult around. And then tech consultants, like other Salesforce shops, had the opposite challenge where like they could talk process tech all day, but when we started saying: “well, what types of nurture program should we run? Or how does this integrate with our like ads in social campaigns?” That just wasn’t really their specialty either. And, it felt like the market was underestimating the marketing tools on the Salesforce platform. So Pardot and Marketing Cloud, I would say. So I basically started Sercante to be what I couldn’t find when I was client side. So strategy, creative, technical execution, analytics and everything that you need really to execute on rev ops types of campaigns.
Anthony: That’s great because even today I recommend and my clients who are looking for a consulting partner, or an implementation partner rather to find someone who has that combined experience of actually running campaigns. I know what it’s like to press the send button, but also having, the actual integration experience to make sure the architecture and the flows and whatever the data model that those things are set up. And I’ll admit that and is definitely one of those implementation partners I have in mind when I get that kind of advice that’s great. Well, what do you see as the biggest challenge for customers starting with Marketing Cloud, Andrea?
Andrea: I think one of the toughest challenges for anyone getting started with marketing automation in general is, you want the tech to come in and solve the problem for you. But there’s usually so much business process and change management that has to happen to really make it successful. And I think, you find that like post implementation when you’re standing at your first journeys and you’re saying, okay, this is the segment that I want to target and this is the content that I want to send them. And here’s how I want to share those results with the team. And like right away, you notice like breaks in the chain. Like, okay, we want to target customers in this section, but we don’t have any data on that. So that’s a project and we want to send them a nurture series, but we don’t have any of that content written. So like that’s the next thing to tackle and then even just thinking about like where to share information with users, like all of the different pieces of that process. So, I think that the biggest challenge is just there’s a lot of heavy lifting to get the ball rolling in the beginning. Of course, if companies are a bit more established and they’re migrating from another platform, it’s a little bit of a different story. But I think that the business process and how to get your team enrolled in the process is often the biggest challenge.
Anthony: Right. So, I’m hearing that what clients maybe underestimate is just that they need to be ready to, for the implementation. It’s gonna be a lot of change management. They need to have their processes clear. Well, maybe to build further on that. When you think about implementing Salesforce Marketing Cloud or part, what expertise and experience as your team bring, how can you help clients most?
Andrea: Yeah. I mean, I think, we bring just sort of a been there, done that expertise… because I mean there there are two types of knowledge that come in really handy during implementations. One is like the day-to-day like pressing the send button as you reference like day in and day out like how are you gonna be using the platform? And then there’s like the upfront configuration work. So, how to migrate data over, how to structure, like what fields on what objects, how to set up your campaign hierarchy? And I will say that some like one-time setup stuff, you may only get exposure if your client side, you may only get exposure to that like one two, three times in the span of your career. So whereas being a consultant, like we do that hundreds of times a year. So, I, we bring kind of both categories of expertise like we’ve walked in your shoes as a day-to-day user, but also like we’ve been through the implementation and best practice decisions during that process many times.
Anthony: I love that. And I think it’s just a great to point out that for some of these things, you definitely need the expert of the third party just because on the client’s side, you get only a few chances throughout your whole career, maybe to do actually in implementation. So it’s very hard to keep up with the tech, know, what works, what doesn’t I don’t follow this up with maybe a little bit more of a cheeky question, Andrea, if you don’t mind, but how do you decide what kind of organization makes it good or bad client?
Andrea: That’s a tough question. You know, I think I would say the vast majority of our past clients, we’ve been blessed that they fall into the good client camp where we have a really good report and like we get through the like even really tough projects we get through together and come out the other side with everybody feeling good and successful outcomes, in the bad client camp or the bad outcome camp. I guess I would say it’s really important to be realistic about what it’s gonna take to do a big complicated project. So, where I do see projects going south or folks being unhappy is if they walk in thinking this is gonna be a piece of cake. This is gonna take two to four weeks to implement.
And then they not really being willing to accept like, okay, this is actually a much bigger elephant than we virtually anticipated. So I’d say that realism is a very important aspect and also just maintaining open communication with your provider. So like trusting some of the things that they’re telling you, sharing as much information as you can to kind of inform the overall project plan. Those I would say are, the two biggest things.
Anthony: Yeah, we listen, realism and having good expectations, I think, is good on the client side, managing expectations. Also a skill that I remember was very available back in my consulting days.
Andrea: Yes.
Anthony: Right. I wonder, you know, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, Salesforce, in general, the ecosystem develops so fast. There’s so many new features. And of course, the ecosystem as a whole mark like as a whole develops super fast. What are you to do up to date with the latest features updates? And I guess it will be interesting to know how you think about that for your team, for your organization? But I’m also curious, so to see, how do you do that personally?
Andrea: Okay. So in terms of like how to stay on top of updates, what I found is, I mean Salesforce always includes release notes with any new changes that they’re putting out. But that’s always like the like 10 percent of the story. Like, you have to really get hands on and try it and like hear from others that are using it to really get a sense of like, okay, this is gonna be super valuable or this is buggy, not really ready for public consumption yet. And so I find different user communities very helpful. So in the Pardot side of things, “Pardashians” is a Slack community that has amazing dialogue about what is and what isn’t working and How To SFMC on the Marketing Cloud side, great places to get ideas, and hear what’s new. LinkedIn, I have mixed feelings about LinkedIn. There’s some really good content out there, but it’s gotten kind of noisy. But there’s some good content out there that from time to time. But then in terms of like staying in touch like CEO level, like what’s changing in the broader ecosystem, like trends in business. I’m a member of two groups, one called EO (Entrepreneurs Organization), and one called YPO, Young Presidents Organization. And then also like I said CEO Round Table of a few other Salesforce companies. And, I find that just like peer-to-peer sharing, like what are you seeing? What are you hearing is like similarly like, you read headlines about, okay, here’s, what’s happening in the business world and sometimes they match, what your experience is as a CEO. And sometimes it’s like, yeah, I’m not really seeing that we saw that a bit last year with all the doom and gloom talk about the state of tech and the economy and like, our clients were thriving. And so like comparing notes with other CEOS and just saying like, okay, what are you seeing? Is this painting out this way for you or are you having a different experience is really helpful to just kind of gut check like what’s going on in the world?
Anthony: Tons of good advice. Just being more on the Marketing Cloud side, I would definitely second How To SFMC as a community and just the people behind are really nice. We had some of the people behind on the show already. And yeah, getting peer-to-peer network around yourself regardless of your role, definitely as a CEO to super helpful. Although I also agree that you have to be careful when you’re comparing notes benchmarks, or like benchmarks. And in the end, it’s what’s happening right in front of you and your business. That of course, is the real truth.
Andrea: Yeah. And, I feel like, in all of these spaces like you also have to be careful to find people who are gonna tell you the truth because a lot of times, I don’t know there’s definitely a persona of person who wants to look like they always have it together that the world is always perfect, that nothing bad is happening. And like to me, I find those people kind of exhausting. Like I really appreciate people who are willing to say like this is super hard or this isn’t working the way that I thought or like I’m having this issue with a client. And I’ve seen that happen in How To SFMC, same thing in Pardashians. So like finding a group of people that will be open and vulnerable and honest is super critical.
Anthony: Yeah, it makes total sense. Love how you said that when you think about… the future, of Salesforce for marketers, I’ll put it this way because I know you guys are working across different clouds. How do you think that the platform is going to evolve to meet the change needs of your clients?
Andrea: So, I’m super excited about, the vision for the Marketing Cloud road map like where things are gonna go in the future. And I see it being driven a lot by, the frenzy that was AI last year… like, the pitch that was painted at Dreamforce, and the pitch that many others are painting of, okay, you’re going to log into this marketing tool. It’s gonna tell you like this is the ideal customer for you to reach out to. It’s. Going to know like the next best product to suggest to them. It’s gonna use gen AI to like write your subject line and your campaign brief in your e-mail and it’s going to send it out and it’s gonna like notify customer service and it’s going to notify sales and analyze everything for you. And it’s all automated. I’ve been looking at stories like that and just thinking like whose data is that? Like whose systems are really that integrated to make a story like that possible? And so, what kind of, the latest news from Salesforce about Marketing Cloud growth in the idea of like building parts of Marketing Cloud on the core Salesforce platform. I really think that like connected vision is what’s driving it. So having shared infrastructure with the same tools that sales service commerce are using. It feels like the future direction, of the whole platform. And I’m really optimistic about it because, I would love to see our customers able to take full advantage of all that AI and some of these new advanced sets can do. But I think getting data connected is sort of the missing link to make all of that possible.
Anthony: I am also super excited about Marketing Cloud growth, the fact that it will finally be on Core and tapping into, you know, newer features such as those offered by Data Cloud. If you think about, it is something that was always lacking ever since the… ExactTarget and Pardot acquisition that became Marketing Cloud. And while to my knowledge that those acquisitions are still the best performing acquisitions for Salesforce, I saw that in the investor notes, I think last year… it’s also true that, you know, it comes with a lot of legacy and tons of integration work and it makes it harder to tap into the rest of the power of Salesforce too. So really exciting what Salesforce doing there? I think there’s a very interesting vision. What do you think will that mean for the customer base? Because they’re positioning it as B2B SMB. But we’ve all seen the price tag too. And then, you know, they already have a few products as well that do marketing. I know we’re getting a little bit on thin ice and it’s very speculative. But what are your thoughts on that if you care to share?
Andrea: Yeah. I think the two biggest hurdles that Salesforce is going to have with Marketing Cloud growth is one figuring out how to adopt the pricing model, and two figuring out how to roll their existing customer base like into the future of the platform. The pricing model, I don’t envy them that challenge because I mean, something that they have to think about is like right now they are competing in the B2B SMB space. So they have like other competitors there to benchmark against. But they are also giving customers access to data cloud which can come with like very heavy like actual consumption costs to Salesforce and they kind of need to balance like, all right, they got a price so that they can actually get into customers but not price so low that like they’re totally like getting their entire like value eaten by like actual Data Cloud consumption. So that’ll be kind of see how that evolves as they move up market and where they land with that pricing model because, I mean, we’ve also seen Data Cloud’s pricing model change several times already, in the short lifespan of that product is just a really hard challenge. And then with regards to like the existing customer base, I do think there’s gonna be confusion for a while on, okay, Marketing Cloud engagement, Marketing Cloud account engagement as Marketing Cloud Growth, like which of these three tools is right for me? And for existing customers, what I’ve heard is that their plan is to basically like as new features are released in growth, they’re giving existing customers access to those features. So the decision is less like when do I switch tools? And more like, okay, I’m grandfathered into these like cool new features. Is this something I’m ready to experiment with or not versus like having to redo contracts, change skews kind of thing.
Anthony: Yeah, definitely interesting challenges related to pricing. I know first hand for “tech heads”, it’s really interesting, really have to find out which parts of your product really provide value and then build your pricing around that. I do think you have a really good point when you say Marketing Cloud Growth because I mean I’m reading between the lines essentially you’re saying Marketing Cloud Growth might have somewhat of a higher pricing than competitors, but you’re getting so much more because you can tap into Data Cloud and that’s super powerful. And I think that is, you know, rightfully a competitive advantage that Salesforce has there. So we’ve talked a little bit about, the future of Salesforce. What about the future of Sercante? What do you envision for the future of your company as it continues to help others implement optimized Marketing Cloud, Pardot, and I’m assuming soon Marketing Cloud Growth as well?
Andrea: Yes. Yeah. So I don’t know if you saw that our website got a face lift last week and, we wrote figure out all the copy on the site, totally new brand, look and feel. And I think that kind of the next phase of our evolution is to date, we’ve been really focused on the needs of the marketer. So all things for marketers on a Salesforce platform. But what we’re increasingly seeing is that marketers, it’s no longer just like the marketing department that they influence and are responsible for. They’re getting into, okay, how does this influence sales? How does, our customers experience post-sale like factor into how we should be thinking about marketing? Are we doing customer advisory boards? How are we like building longterm loyal relationships? And so we’ve changed our messaging slightly to focus on like delivering seamless digital experiences for customers, recognizing that marketing is now sales marketing, customer service. And that’s the whole umbrella that marketers get involved in touching?
Anthony: Makes sense, if you look at, you know, from scale-ups to post IPO companies, a vast amount of revenue is. So in some cases half of revenue in a new year is basically expansion into existing accounts. I’m talking mainly from the B2B space, but you have similar trends in B2C. So just maintain the customer relationship is just a huge revenue driver and also more capital efficient typically. So I love the shift. It makes total sense. And I actually also saw the announcement that you guys wrote. You wrote a very thoughtful piece on what is behind the brand identity. So I’ll make sure to add that link, in the description of this of the show of this episode. Awesome. Andrea. Another thing that I’ve noticed on your background is that you’d like to give back and you’ve been heavily involved in the community. Can you tell a little bit more about that?
Andrea: Yeah, that’s a huge, I guess part of who I am and also something I think we built in to second culturally. One of our core values is generosity and we actively encourage our whole team being involved in the Salesforce community, but also like, the actual life communities where they live and work. And I guess like a few ways, that I get back. So like I think earlier in my career when I was just learning things or just figuring things out, like I would just reach out to ran of people on LinkedIn and say, like, hey, do you have time to grab coffee or can I pick your brain about xyz? And probably about 20 percent of those like they just said, yeah, sure. Like let’s do it. And so when I’m on the flip side of that, like when people reach out to me, I probably not 100 percent but pretty close to 100 percent of the time I say, okay, yeah, let’s chat. Let me see if I can put you in the right direction. So I guess that’s one way and then also getting involved in supporting other entrepreneurs. So, I think I mentioned EO, Entrepreneurs Organization. They have an accelerator program for businesses that are like just getting started and trying to scale up. So I’m entering other aspiring business leaders through there. And then also just again folks in the Salesforce community that a, that are starting their journey as an entrepreneur.
Anthony: Nice, really nice. I personally also like mentoring because I find that it helps crystallise my own thinking. So there’s definitely just, it feels good. It’s a good thing to do, to mentor, but there’s it’s also interesting at least to me that… it helps you see things more clearly because you just have to rephrase it in a way that makes sense. Is that something you recognize?
Andrea: 100 percent agree. It’s it’s fascinating to me how people process the same information in such different ways. So I…It’s also just great. Like, I feel like I get a lot of learning at in venturing others also because like you see how they’re seeing the worlds, the questions that they’re asking. And sometimes it’s just, it reminds you where, you have blindspots of your own.
Anthony: Absolutely. Yeah, yeah, it’s very interesting. Well, we’re almost coming up on time here, but could you give us a sneak peek into some of the exciting plans you guys have for this year? Events? Anything else?
Andrea: We’ll definitely be at Connections. So, we always throw a big party there. So we’ll definitely be at that. Definitely looking forward to Dreamforce and our team will be at a lot of Dreamin’ events, World Tours, kind of ongoing things over the next few months. And then MarDreamin’, of course, is I always got to plug that, but that’s not gonna be until November. So, we got some time there.
Anthony: MarDreamin’ is definitely a great plug, So glad you pointed that out. as for the World Tour events, and Connections and whatnot, I will just second that it’s a great party, the Sercante party, we will definitely be there as well. Andrea, it’s just been fantastic. I really appreciate your time on a Sunday by the way. I hope to see you soon.
Andrea: Thank you!
Discover how our platform instantly optimizes your Marketing Cloud
Anthony Lamot: Hi, JB. Welcome to the show.
Jyothsna Bitra (JB): Hi, Anthony. So happy to be here.
Anthony Lamot: It’s great, having you, I believe it the first time that I am having someone on the show who’s at the moment of the interview based in India.
Jyothsna Bitra: Yeah. As of now, as we are speaking in India, so business as usual, it just goes the same way that I am in that I was in us.
Anthony Lamot: For sure for sure. And you do have a beautiful set up behind you by the way. I love the whole branding there?
Jyothsna Bitra: Thank you.
Anthony Lamot: So, JB for those who don’t know you yet, could you tell a bit about your background and what led you to start consulting?
Jyothsna Bitra: Where should I start? So to start with how I entered into the Salesforce? I still feel it’s those magical moments. So I was working as a configuration and release manager and it was kind of monotonous work. And out of my interest and curiosity, I was helping out other teams, the center of excellence team who were trying to integrate Jira with Salesforce at the time. I have no idea what Salesforce is. So I happened to know about Salesforce. I help them with the integration. And out of my curiosity, I wanted to learn further and there was an immediate meet on a project where I volunteered to be on the team so that’s how I got introduced to the Salesforce. I can say I was an accidental admin and the same way it happened to me that I bounced upon the Marketing Cloud. So there was a project and I was the go to person and there was a team already. So they were, they were all there to help me. I learned from them and I had the hands on or so it’s been like six less years in the Marketing Cloud world. So I’m really glad that I found Marketing Cloud and, I like the work that I do. So I enjoy my work every day.
Anthony Lamot: Interesting. And so, you actually came from a release management side. So if I understood correctly, you were working mostly with Jira doing releases but not so much into Salesforce itself. And then gradually developed into more Marketing Cloud work. So I’m kinda curious what you think about and if you don’t work related to release management specifically for Salesforce, Marketing Cloud itself because it’s this tricky thing, right? Where people who come from Salesforce CRM, they’re used to having sandboxes, test environments, release sets, deployments, et cetera. These are all things that aren’t really there in Marketing Cloud. So, so what are your thoughts about that?
Jyothsna Bitra: So when I worked as a configuration and release manager, I used to, I worked on different tools. So ClearCase was one of them. So it has very good branching mechanisms and then many ways that we can maintain the developer or so it’s very easy to identify the work and merge the work. So it’s very strategy and it’s very robust. So when I started working on the Salesforce, and I learned about the sandboxes, it’s not as robust as the release environment that I have seen before. But still, from the times that I started working on Salesforce to where… it is. Now, I see a lot of advancements in there and all on the Marketing Cloud, I know it’s something which is lacking and I see this in the day to day activities as well when a new team member joins and they don’t know, they don’t remember to take a backup of the existing e-mail and they directly go and edit on the emails that’s something which bothers me, which reminds me the need for having a source control system like that.
Anthony Lamot: Yeah, yeah. That makes sense. And constantly backing up mail e-mail templates, definitely a good idea because those things can really get out of control. And, and I think people really under estimate just how complex programming emails is because they have so many different clients and not just different providers but even the different versions of those providers, like different versions of Microsoft Outlook just to name one. But I think, yeah, I think people from the Salesforce CRM ecosystem, they’re used to having release sets because it’s one of the things that made Salesforce such a good enterprise CRM, the fact that you could have released as well supporting those and of users. But I think, and so the notion of deployments and release management is a little bit more well known amongst CRM providers but not definitely, not all of them. But Salesforce is sort of outstanding there. But then all those EESPS and marketing automation platforms including ExactTarget one that was acquired. They, I don’t think they’ve ever heard of the notion of release set. And I, and I’m not sure, but I’m pretty sure MailChimp Hubspot, Marketo, don’t have release as part certainly doesn’t have release sets. So I wonder if it has something to do with that’s just like, the legacy of these platforms.
Jyothsna Bitra: Hoping to see advancements on that front.
Anthony Lamot: Yeah, yeah. And I’m sure we’ll see a lot more and especially with so much effort in the Marketing Cloud space of Salesforce going towards the Data Cloud which sits more on their… the same platform. The CRM sits. I’m sure we’ll have more capabilities there too. So, hey, JB, you’re wearing this very awesome hoodie, those in the ecosystem will know as, the Golden Hoodie. So, can you tell a little bit more about how did you earn this illustrious Salesforce Golden Hoodie?
Jyothsna Bitra: So… there is no secret recipe for this Anthony. To my knowledge, nobody knows who is going to get, who will get, but my understanding is that someone who has shown who has been outgoing, helping out people, has shown their leadership capabilities and learning capabilities. I think they are the ones who can be identified as the Golden Hoodie recipe recipient. But as I have heard from people just like contrary to the MVP MVP, we have some set standards like generosity expertise and leadership and so on. But for the Golden Hoodie, I think it’s for the people who go out and help people and who have been leaving an example of a Trailblazer.
Anthony Lamot: Yeah, I think that makes sense. And we’ve had a few other Golden Hoodies on the show including people like Kaelan Moss, who do a lot of things. I would say educational, right? They put out a lot of content on how to, you know, how to learn to work with Marketing Cloud. On that notice. I also notice that you are the founder of the Marketing Cloud Learning Camp. Do you think that has something to do with the Golden Hoodie maybe?
JB: Maybe. So a few years ago, I started helping out the women Trailblazers, the even the Trailblazers-like women who were in a break or who haven’t started their carrier. So those are the people who I knew through my community neighborhoods. So I found a need for the women to get together, have a support system. So that’s how it’s all started. So. And then, I extended it and introduced Salesforce. And I have continuously done some sessions every weekend where I introduced to the head and we did some modules together. I help them clear the certifications. And it makes me very proud to see the success of the people who never thought they can go out and they can explore the world of opportunities. So whatever progress that they make, whatever success they have achieved, it feels so great to feel that I’m also a little part of it. So that, that’s one thing which I think which qualifies me for the Golden Hoodie and that deal continued so with the Marketing Cloud. And as you rightly said, MC Learning Camp. So I started it to help the people learn the Marketing Cloud. So when I started it, it’s like three years ago, there were not many resources for somebody who wants to learn Marketing Cloud. So from that time on, I’ve been continuously doing some boot camps and the various topics. So the journey is continuing and, it makes me feel very glad so that the purpose of my life, whatever I think that it’s a purpose for live purpose driven life. So seeing the success of the people, like I see some posts on the LinkedIn or people reaching out to me saying that they have cleared the certification or they are venturing, they’re starting their learning in the Marketing Cloud and they go to place, is the YouTube videos that I have been posting or the MC learning camp sessions that I’ve been doing. So it’s ultimate satisfaction for me. So all the efforts that I have spent, I feel like it’s worth spending.
Anthony Lamot: That’s fantastic. There’s a few things actually there you said are really interesting in word exploring more, maybe we can start by on the women Trailblazer group that you refer to. Can you just for the audience they’re say, explain a little bit more what that group is about? And what I would personally be really interested to know is obviously, most people working in tech or male, right? I think even at Salesforce, and they’re above industry standard. There’s about 34 percent women at my company. It’s about one third which again, is pretty good concern considering the industry as a whole, but of course, it’s still a far cry from being truly equal, in the sense of being 50 50 split between male and female. So, as a, you know, as a founder and executive, I would also be personally interested in learning what strategies you found to be successful in getting women more excited about a tech, or just making women successful, in a tech role?
Jyothsna Bitra: So when I got the thought of starting a group, I have seen the troubles and the hardships faced up by people who have integrated to the U.S. and also someone who is dependent for everything, at least if they wanna go outside of if they want to purchase something, they are coming into a new country and also having language barriers and also cultural differences. It’s hard to go out and do anything of their, on their own. So, I have seen many sad stories. So, the intention of starting the group, I was initially to provide a support system, so to gather at least once in a week, give a friendly support that’s how it started. So. And then it started with knowledge sharing some sessions. And then I thought why not Salesforce because I was working on the Salesforce core at that time. No, I was working on the Marketing Cloud, but I was helping out different people on the Salesforce. So I thought why not introduce them? They’re very, there’s a long way to go for them to actually think of taking a job. But then I thought why not introduce, and then people who are interested who can spend some time, they can pursue that. So I started spending some time, I see a lot of interest. And, I also observed that the people who weren’t break and people who were trying to come out of their situation, so they have more passion they were, they will be ready to do any kind of hard work. So I have seen that personally and the women that I have helped, they have spent days and nights even without taking a break in between spending 19 hours a day investing on the head modules, learning and clearing the certifications. So I was very much in admiration for them what the hardware they have been putting. So I believe in that, the Karma philosophy, right? So if we put in the hard work, the results will eventually come. So they have done their hard work and the situation came that at my work position I was… I found some opportunities open opportunities and I help them join us the interns. And then they were working now in IBM and some great companies. So it’s…
Anthony Lamot: They started as interns?
Jyothsna Bitra: The, they started as a Salesforce developers and then they’re not working in good companies. So what I have seen different with this group of people is the passion and the commitment and the hard work. So they really and especially with the women. The more dedicated, I wouldn’t classify the women and the man. But what I have seen in my personal experience is they’re ready to go out to break the sale glass ceiling and then spending extra time and effort to achieve what they plan for.
Anthony Lamot: Yeah, it’s almost as if, the women who consciously and intentionally do that are… maybe you can be at an advantage compared to their male counterpart just because there’s so much more driven, and they do a purpose and with intent and they know also what they’re up against. So they’re kind of better braised for the battle so to speak, if that makes sense to you.
Jyothsna Bitra: That, that exactly makes sense Anthony.
Anthony Lamot: I also like how you mentioned working away with interns. It, it just caught my attention because when we were still a start up initially and we were a bootstrap company for a while, so we had absolutely zero money. It even took a long time before I started paying myself a salary. We DESelect, and we started working with interns initially as well because in Europe, there’s a great program call called the Erasmus program and it’s for 10 interns to go abroad. I did it too when I was a student. So that might Co-Founder, Jonathan. And so we thought this could be a funny way. And actually that was one of the things that really accelerated us as a company to start even though obviously had to train them a lot. And for some of them, it was the first time working in a company. It was so cool, to get a sense of all these people, you know, are learning, they’re growing in their roles, are growing as people. It’s, very satisfying. And on that note, you in passing alluded to purpose early kinda curious. What is your purpose? Because it sounds like you are definitely a woman with purpose. You mentioned getting great satisfaction out of seeing people learn and so on. So, would you say you have a specified purpose or how do you think about that?
Jyothsna Bitra: I would say in my family especially my dad used to give a lot of stress importance to education. So always used to say that of all, the things that you give to the people to share with the people knowledge is the is of utmost valuable because it is not something which will be spoiled or it is not something which we give it to somebody who is not worthy of it. So, I invested so much in the education and also helping out. And initially when I just started out my job and I just started my little earnings, I used to help out students who were having some difficulties in the finances. So I used to give the money and later I was helping in different ways in the, I was part of various nonprofits and, years. So was I was helping on different ways, different platforms but not really like going ahead and teaching someone. But then as I’m already in the Salesforce ecosystem then I thought why not teach somebody? Why not help people make their careers? Because it’s like it’s like helping them changing their life. So from where I started to how it’s changed, I pivoted to helping people more with the Salesforce and running the sessions. So I see the direct results as well. So if giving money, they may use it or not use it or they may be more, they may be dedicated or not. But with the Salesforce and these sessions, I can easily make out who is really interested. And if I’m really spending time on the worthy people or not. And, and also seeing directly the results of what my efforts have been link.
Anthony Lamot: Of course, of course. And, and… I think there’s something very candid what you said about people wary, of the knowledge and teaching because it’s so much more energy giving working with people just absorb everything like a sponge and are really driven to learn. Whereas if you’re talking with people who are just not motivated to learn, that can be very draining and this kind of the opposite of what you want. But now also understanding your motivation for education and knowing how much importance you attach to this kind of explains probably why you have, I think 16 Salesforce certificates. Is that right?
Jyothsna Bitra: I think it’s 19?
Anthony Lamot: Okay. Yeah. Then I think then because I saw it on your LinkedIn profile, but I think you’ve been scoring a few more than since you had.
Jyothsna Bitra: Yeah, I updated. So I think all almost all of the places just say 16.
Anthony Lamot: Sure. Okay. So this is the first time that the audience knows that you actually have 19 already. Do, do you have already have an idea what will be your twentieth certificate? Because I assume you’re not going to stop?
Jyothsna Bitra: I’m planning to give one by this year end. So I have one month, not even one month. So, I hope I can clear it. So I have the date scheduled. So I have to see.
Anthony Lamot: Okay. And which one is it?
Jyothsna Bitra: Integration architect.
Anthony Lamot: Integration architect. All right. Well, I wish you good luck. I hope that I don’t know if you take a holiday break, but I hope you’ll find some time, to study for it.
Jyothsna Bitra: Thank you. So I’m just banking on the holiday time, so I get some free time at that time.
Anthony Lamot: Great. Yeah, there’s a way to do it. So moving from education to your actual project work throughout your career. What would you say was, your most interesting, maybe your most fun project specifically for Marketing Cloud that you’ve done so far?
Jyothsna Bitra: It’s hard to say which one is the, because I see each project comes its own challenges. So I can say the projects which I worked on the healthcare because given the security and… safety that we need to follow. So that’s one thing which I found challenging. And also some of the projects that I worked on the data and the tools, the complexity of the tools that are being used, and the number of marketing tools that are being used. As we see here in marketing landscape, we have like 13,000 plus marketing tools available. I have come across a client ones using 300 plus marketing tools and at least some of them, at least 10 of them were integrated with the Marketing Cloud. So they wanted to even they were frustrated about so many tools. And if somebody on board the need for the new person to get a client to get trained on all these tools is also go ahead. So they were also frustrated with the number of tools used and the number of places they have to go to get some information. So they were planning to optimize the usage of the Marketing Cloud. So that’s when I was on that project helping them find out which one they can get rid of and which one is the optimum that can stay. So that’s something. Because while working as a consultant, different projects, different tools, and also the migration from different tools. When we’re migrating from a different tool, we need to understand that tool as well. Besides working on the Marketing Cloud. And if that is a mature organization, if they have invested so much, they have already performing so much of sense. I using the marketing tool, it’s very hard to switch to migrate as well considering all the data, all the tracking information, and all the campaigns getting migrated. And also making sure that the live sense are not impacted. So they have to go as planned as scheduled. So that’s something which I felt challenging and any more just to talk a few the migration projects I feel are somewhat challenging.
Anthony Lamot: For sure, for sure. And so this one project that you alluded to, I think was really interesting if I understood correctly, you have one client that had more than a whopping 300 more tech tools in house. And was the goal of that project to get rid of some of those tools, and migrate functionality and campaigns to the Marketing Cloud. Was that the idea?
Jyothsna Bitra: Yes, kind of, so they were having or they were having Marketing Cloud and for SMS, they were using something else and were advertising, they were using something else and for analytics unit. So, some of the external tool. So it’s like multiple places. I, it’s hard just to think about it. I’m going to multiple places. It’s it’s hard to envision that as well. So the plan was to get rid of some of the ones optimize the usage of the Marketing Cloud.
Anthony Lamot: And could you help us understand a little bit like how do you, how do you approach such a project? Could you walk me through like the different phases and some of the biggest challenges, in those phases that, you came across, you already mentioned when you have to migrate away from one tool to the next, you also have to kind of have to know what that tool does, but just affect that. They had so many different tools in house doing so many different things. How did you? Yeah, how did you tackle such a project?
Jyothsna Bitra: It involved a lot of discussions, a lot of meetings. And also you may have experienced this while working on different projects. When people are working as a team, so many stakeholders will be involved and it will be hard to get a buy in from everyone. So some people will be for it and some people will be against it and pulling all the people together and convincing them and explaining them the benefits of moving over from one tool to another tool. One thing which I have faced big challenge is people don’t want to migrate, they get used to some one tool. And even though they know the advantages of migrating to, the advanced tool, they’ll be hesitation or they will be, there will be a lack of resistance. I mean, like they’ll be resistance to move to the other tools. So that’s one thing which I have seen so with a lot of discussions and then proper planning ahead of the meetings, what kinds of information that we need. And also for me, it was challenging as I mentioned before to learn, I learned a lot of tools, marketing tools. It’s like a high level knowledge of what each tool does and how integrated with the Marketing Cloud and how that data is all flowing through from one system to another system. So that background work and I have spent some time to research and what each tool does and in the companies context and how they’re utilizing it and what feature they’re actually using it. It’s not necessary that they’re using all the features of a specific tool even though they have it’s like they have budget and they purchase the tool but they’re not using all the benefits of what the tool can do. So they were using only a few features of the tool. So what features are being used? What data is being used? That’s also something which I have analyzed and then putting together everything and comparing giving them the pros and cons of a specific tool, what can stay? What cannot need not stay? And it also required some effort on convincing different teams. So multiple meetings, I say again, so different teams were involved and convincing them and explaining them. So finally we were able to provide some recommendations and some were taken and some as I said, resistance were there. So maybe in the future they may finally choose to migrate again.
Anthony Lamot: Super interesting. Yeah. Some of the things you said were super recognizable. I think one of the first things you mentioned in getting people around the table having meetings and getting alignment, I would say getting they’re buying one great consultant that I once used once worked for, sorry, he used to phrase “coalition building” especially in the larger enterprise organization where you would try to identify one or two people who really want to get align with the project. And then from there a few other people, a few other people. So that by the time he actually got to the big meeting, everyone was actually already on the same page. The coalition had already been built and, they didn’t have to be convinced them or within the meeting. I thought that was really insightful. It was almost like probably a good course on how to be a politician. The, the other thing, that you said to is people get used to tools. There’s just massive resistance to change. So was that something was that strong in that project? To the want to 300 something tools where people are just very attached to their old tools.
Jyothsna Bitra: What I noticed was there was only one particular team which do not want to move, but all the other teams involved. Now five other teams. They were pro for it and they were actually supporting, they were actually pushing it to get the buy in. But for that one specific team, they do not want to because they were already frustrated that they had to learn so many tools. And now that they learned one specific tool, they got used to it. And now they have to go and learn the other tool. And under the Marketing Cloud, the common challenge that people face that what I heard frequently is that the UI marketing cloud has, it makes it difficult for people to learn if let’s say Pardot or any other app that sits on the Salesforce, if they’re used to work on the Salesforce, it’s easy for them. The knowledge is not too much, but for somebody who is starting with Marketing Cloud, the UI is completely different and the process as well is different. So they have some hard time learning and that’s where I felt the teams do not want to start using Marketing Cloud.
Anthony Lamot: Yeah. Also something that I have experienced at a project working in the past, and still something we control with DESelect. Obviously because, we replace one of the most technical parts, with some of our solutions and we make it a little easier, to understand. But I think, you know, this is just a kind of trade off you have in a platform as powerful as Salesforce Marketing Cloud. It is a Ferrari and you can do so many things with it, but you have to learn how to drive it. Otherwise, yeah, you’re not going to be able to, and I think, yeah, that’s just the downside of having such a powerful platform.
Jyothsna Bitra: Yeah. And, and we have a distributed marketing. So we went that route and we provided them the options and the capabilities of distributed marketing and the flexibility of using that within the Salesforce UI itself. So it worked out. So… for one client, we proposed distributed marketing and, that was taken, and for another client, so they have the similar issue. So they have a big team. What we have done for them is they wanted some other advanced capabilities more than what distributed marketing can do. So they wanted to create emails. They wanted to have the flexibility to choose between different journeys, the multi step journeys, and also add the campaign members from everything within the Salesforce. So what I marketing can do plus lot more. So that is all done as customization on the Salesforce with a lot of communication happening between the Marketing Cloud and Salesforce and for the SMS they were using and the tool. So it’s like Salesforce is the data source and Marketing Cloud is only used as the sending engine. And on the customization, they were able to do from within the Salesforce itself. And they don’t even need to log into the marketing cloud for the distributed marketing. Some admin has to be there in the Marketing Cloud, and they have to set up the journeys. They have to create the e-mail with some dynamic content. So the people on the Salesforce, they can go and choose between different elements. But with the customization in the Salesforce, there’s more flexibility on those parts.
Anthony Lamot: Yes, for sure. I’ve seen that setup to happen before where the maybe not necessarily master data management but at least, the master of record and the core data is kept in the CRM. And, a lot more automation can be built in the CRM. Obviously then in Marketing Cloud. And then Marketing Cloud is almost like an execution channel as there may be other channels too, for communication. To… now, one thing that I started to wonder about JB while we were talking is kind of, how does your brain work to dissect a new market tool? Because I’m here, I’m thinking well, you have 19 certifications. You’ve done many of these projects where they had many… there are tools before Marketing Cloud to which you sometimes have to migrate. And as you mentioned, you do have to kind of understand what these tools do. So given the fact that you’ve been exposed and had to investigate so many tools. I wonder if you have some kind of methodology or some method I’m basically trying to figure out like how does your brain work? If I, you know, show you a new tool tomorrow? How do you approach that? And, and this is something other people can learn, and use, for their own project work?
Jyothsna Bitra: There’s no secret formula, Anthony. I would say YouTube. So if I want on high level overview, I would just go and watch some videos. So it depends on the type of integration the tool has with the Marketing Cloud. So earlier, I was working on migration of the campaigns from responses to the Marketing Cloud.
I needed an indepth, understanding of how everything is organized within responses, how everything works in the responses. So I have to go a step further and see more videos and try it for myself in the responses system or, and… have to figure out what just like the way we have different data extensions and e-mail at one place and the journey in a different place and the responses as well. The data is all scattered. So it’s not that easy to navigate there and understand the things. But by the end of the project, I got a good handle that that’s what I believe I learned some new tool. If I were to start creating some emails and the responses or do some sequel or set something up in the responses, I can say, I can do, I can start with. So my go to place will be YouTube and any other tool specific learning content also is there. So I would go and check that.
Anthony Lamot: Okay, great. Yeah, I think it makes all sense by the way. But sometimes, the most simple solutions are the best. So thanks for sharing that, we have one other thing except for, you know, doing Marketing Cloud projects. We have one other thing in common that is that we are about Salesforce user group leaders and I believe you’re the Phoenix Salesforce user group leaders. So I was kinda curious what’s been your most fun get together or your most, your favorite memory of, you know, being a group leader?
Jyothsna Bitra: There are many actually. But the inaugural event is always the most memorable and also the inaugural boot camp. So I started doing the administrator boot camp. I think it’s in 2019 or 2020. So when I started, it was my first time handling that such a big event, it was like a 12 days session happening every alternate day. And then when I started with, I got 100 registrations and in just one day, it reached 300 or 400. And I was, I started wearing at that time. So, I am that kind of person who do not want to say no for somebody who wants to learn who are passionate to learn. So that made me worry that I had to say no to the people who wants to attend the boot camp. So it was like in 24 hours, it was like the thing I continuously kept, it kept receiving the messages notifications that registrations are happening and this much of count is happening. So the end of the day, it made me worried. So, I did not, at that time, I did not know, how to say no to the people?
So, Linda was there for my support and she helped me out with the first boot camp. So I was very nervous at that time handling so many. Such a big audience also was, it made me a bit nervous. So Linda was there for each and every session and she provided a lot of support. So it was the most memorable. And the other boot camps, it’s just the same way they follow this week.
Anthony Lamot: All right. And, and in the end, how many people actually took the boot camp of all those registered people?
Jyothsna Bitra: The first station, I saw a lot of attendance and, by the time we reached the last day of the boot camp, I see the attendance decline. But the first one is-
Anthony Lamot: Normal, of course.
Jyothsna Bitra: Yeah, 75 percent admins or something.
Anthony Lamot: Yeah, that’s great. That’s great. Well, I didn’t realize you guys, it’s such a big boot camps link to the user group. Was there a special occasion for that? Or was that, where did the idea come from?
Jyothsna Bitra: So I took the admin certification at that time, Marketing Cloud Administrator. And then I, I’m already leading the group and I thought that why not have a session for people who wants to give the certification? Maybe I can share some tips. So it was a joint meeting with Atlanta user group on my group. So I gave a session that was just one hour. Then I thought one hour isn’t just enough to cover the whole aspect of the Marketing Cloud. So the, no, I thought why not take complete full-fledged boot camp that can be helpful for people who wants to learn Marketing Cloud as well. So administrator is something which a beginner also can start with. If they want to learn Marketing Cloud, they can start with the administration concepts. So that can be helpful for both for the beginners and for the people who wants to clear the certifications. So that started like that. So that, the initial idea was to do one session and it turned out to be 12 sessions.
Anthony Lamot: That’s amazing. So it just game very organically and then it kinda started to live of its own. It seems well, very, I mean, very impressive. Great job on that. I’m kinda curious, on a somewhat different note, you, you’ve alluded to having to work with SQL before and you’ve seen marketers work on different projects with Marketing Cloud, you know, at different companies, are there some uncommon use cases where you’ve seen marketers successfully use unique segmentation strategies or a different way to as it is, you know, have you seen very interesting targeting or segmentation being built at customers? It’s it’s a subject that, you know, for us at DESelect, where we have a segmentation solution on the Appexchange. It’s it’s a topic that interests us a lot that’s us a lot.
Jyothsna Bitra: Yeah. As we are talking about that, I like my, Segment and the Engage as well. How the tool has been helping. I have seen some clients use the Engage and Segment. And I myself use Search to find out data extensions. It is as I have to say, and this is, this tool is like savior when I want to find some data extensions and there were a large number of data extensions out there on a complicated folder structure. So apart from that, I have seen clients, it varies from client to client, but I have seen clients using segmentation on a granular level to identify the people. So I have seen a client who sends out the e-mail or who do their service based on, the conditions and based on the type of insurance or the type of vehicle they have. So, in such scenarios, segmenting on the location and on the weather depending on the weather. And also based on their licenses based on their subscription level. And also the kind of a it’s something that makes it complicated. And I have the invalid, apart from, DESelect Search… I found the tools within in the Marketing Cloud. The features also help for the segmentation features. Apart from the Salesforce, the SQL, the engagement split to analyze opens and clicks, and also the Einstein features that are available out there. And for clients who have integrations with the person, MCP, the personalization, I have seen, they have effectively used the segmentation in the personalization and then get that data integrated into the Marketing Cloud and run the journeys from the Marketing Cloud.
Anthony Lamot: Yeah. Interesting. I like how you first off, thank you for the compliment for our products, much appreciated. But then, yeah, there are some of these interesting features in Marketing Cloud that you kinda can also use for segmentation. Like within like an engagement split is one way of doing it. The other thing you mentioned briefly is Einstein that’s a great. Let’s say bridge to the next question. There’s been so much a I innovation within Salesforce, but obviously also outside of it with open a, I really leading the efforts, but other companies like Google and Microsoft quickly catching up or following, you know, pursuing the same thing? This is a hard question but I don’t think anyone can really have the answer. But how do you think marketing will change? Or how will marketing teams look like maybe a year to three years from now with everything that’s happening in AI.
Jyothsna Bitra: I’m very hopeful of what comes in the future with all the advancements already happening in Marketing Cloud. All these features being added so quickly. I’m hopeful that many more changes are to come. And I’m hoping for something like a I driven automation with streamlines the entire marketing operations. So just like the way we have the journey templates provided within the Marketing Cloud, I am envisioning something like a whole end to end process, right? From starting a campaign to all the steps that goes within the campaign, the e-mail creation, the AB testing, the Journey creation, the analytics and all the steps that goes in between. So I am hoping some process will be there so easily. Even if begin a, we do not have much knowledge. We’ll be able to set up the code is taken care, the e-mail bills not taken care. So that, that’s what I am envisioning. So even I am excited to see and can’t wait to see what the future holds.
Anthony Lamot: So, so an end to end process for a campaign. So I wonder what that feature would look like? Would it be something like a prompt where I would say, so for instance, if I wanted to use this kind of automation for my own company? And for instance, we recently just announced, our MOP. So I could just say something like, hey, Marketing Cloud, build me a campaign for our MOP, and this is what it’s about and maybe give a description. And then Marketing Cloud would maybe make a journey with seven emails, and select audience and everything. Is that how you envision it, or do you imagine something different?
Jyothsna Bitra: Something similar to that, Anthony. So just like the way we have journey templates for someone who not have…, a basic plan of the journey structure, how it should like, look like they can start with the template and see what they can include, what they can update the same way for a campaign. It could be something like the whole process listed and the end user can select what steps they want and what steps they can eliminate. And also just like an in ap guidance, it can provide some assistance saying this will be helpful. And this feature is something which can optimize the campaign effectiveness. I’m thinking something on those lines.
Anthony Lamot: Sounds very interesting. Yeah. We’ve also been thinking a lot about overall campaign planning especially, with DESelect Engage which now has a big campaign planning feature. It will be kinda cool to have a like a button that so could kind of reorganize their whole campaign planning too. So. And then if you could combine those two ideas, you can get this and state where maybe the whole end to end process of a campaign, is AI generated. I don’t doubt it would still be human involved to QA to make sure that the best potential answers images are taken and there’s no like kind of hallocinations, in what the AI is providing. But then once you have those things and, you multiply the number of times and you also need to have the constant overview and so having some AI driven capabilities that could completely reorganize your planning so that you get the highest amount of conversions because campaigns are nicely spread out and people are not over such rate. I think that’s super exciting. I think that’s really going to be, it’s going to allow us to turn people in marketing operations into, you know, marketing, super heros because it’s going to be, you know, tremendous power.
Jyothsna Bitra: Yeah. So people need not spend much time learning Marketing Cloud. They just need to learn some of the main places where they can go and customize
Anthony Lamot: All that’s left then is just being a great marketer. That will be, that will be fantastic. Maybe a last question before, we round up the interview. So because we have been eluding a bit of and talking quite a bit about the technical side of things. But while people in marketing operations, marketing automation are more typically maybe associated with the technical side of things, the soft skills that they need to be successful, the leadership skills that they need to be successful or also super important. What do you think are these skills? Soft skills, leadership skills that you need to drive in these kinds of roles?
Jyothsna Bitra: I would say as a marketer, it’s very important to be empathetic, resilient and also very important to be at adaptive. So we have seen the pandemic, and we have learned so many lessons from that to be to encourage option, be flexible and creative. So that, I feel as a marketer, it’s very important to be creative and adaptive and flexible enough and be able to pivot whatever the situation is.
Anthony Lamot: So, I heard being adaptive super important and I really like that you also start your answer by saying being empathetic. I think that’s really great parting advice. So, JB, thank you so much for making the time and coming on to show. Has been a pleasure talking with you and just learning more about your background and what you’ve seen in the industry. So, thanks for your time.
Anthony Lamot: Happy to be here, Anthony. Thanks for having me.
Discover how our platform instantly optimizes your Marketing Cloud
Anthony Lamot: Hey, Aaron, welcome to the show.
Aaron Beatty: Hey, super happy to be here. Thanks for having.
Anthony Lamot: It’s absolutely a pleasure. It’s been a few months now, a few weeks now since we started or a Dreamforce. I was very happy to have been able to meet you face to face. And I’m very excited to have you here today. For our audience, can you tell us a bit about yourself, your background and ultimately what led you to found Engage Evolution?
Aaron Beatty: Sure. Yeah. So I’m gonna do my best to give the cliff notes otherwise, you know, I don’t know how much time we have, for the podcast, but I have a tendency to go in the way too much detail. So… I will give you, the quick background which is that I started in aerospace engineering. I worked for Northrop Grumman on the C-17 Globe Master 3 aircraft for a while then I switched into professional theater which you know, is a natural jump for most people to go from aerospace engineering to professional theater. But right doing that though I was a master sent Carpenter and a house manager. And then I did some time in retail. I worked for Apple for about eight years. And… once I was ready to start a family, it was time to find something that was a little more friendly to that. And that’s when I started learning about Exact Target and later Salesforce Marketing Cloud. And so that was, in 2012. And so over a decade now, I think I get to say I’ve been working on that and learning it and, you know, I kinda went through the ropes of that. So building emails, and testing, and campaign management, and support, and documentation, and all the other things that are part, of that ecosystem and just kinda been working my way up the ladder for a while. And my last position was as a director, of a group of a Salesforce Marketing Cloud practice. And, and ultimately, I would say frustrated that sometimes it feels like the larger an organization gets, the more it stops listening to their people start stops listening to their customers and it starts to feel like a herculean effort to try to get anything done or to try to get things changed from how they always were. And so ultimately, those frustrations, let me to feel like I had no other choice but to start my own Salesforce Marketing Cloud practice. And so that’s what happened in February of this year. And so I’ve been doing that ever since and, not a huge length of time there. But things seem to be going well, and I really enjoyed it.
Anthony Lamot: What a background I would ever explore what you’re currently doing, but there are a few things at that were interesting. So it continues to amaze me how much of a variation there is amongst marketing information professionals. In fact, a few interviews ago, I interviewed one of our own, Eduardo, who leads our customer success team, and he originally started his career programming satellites.
Aaron Beatty: Wow.
Anthony Lamot: Yeah. So the, I almost think also that having that variety for sure. The real life experience helps, I think for any marketing experience, sometimes just having worked in these very technical industries can definitely set you on the right track to deal with marketing automation because it’s so complex.
Aaron Beatty: Yeah. It, it is, and definitely can be. I think for me, my background, you know, I can look at every job that I’ve had and pick out little things you know, that I picked up, you know, while I was in engineering, little things I picked up when I was in retail, and sales, and a bunch of things while I was at apple. And that’s impacted, how I run my own company. It’s impacted how I treat customers and colleagues, and, it ultimately changes what I look for in a Salesforce Marketing Cloud employee too. Like, what am I looking for from people that I want to join my company as we grow? It’s all influenced by that background. But yeah, everybody’s there’s not a, I mean, there probably is now a digital marketing or marketing automation degree, but yeah, I didn’t go through anything even close to that.
Anthony Lamot: Are you ever able to tap into your experience as a master scenic Carpenter when you’re back working for?
Aaron Beatty: You know, I suppose, if I really wanted to, I, you know, my parents at one point wanted to me to be an architect and I was never really that interested in that. And then I got into building sets and stuff like that and being a master scenic Carpenter and, you know, what you do there? I’m not necessarily coming up with what the sets gonna look like. There’s a designer for that, but then they give you some crazy thing to build and you’ve got to figure out, you know, the structures that are maybe behind the scenes and, you know, how it’s all gonna fit together and still manage to support an actor’s weight or, you know, not hurt somebody when they’re on stage, you know, lost in their character, and not paying attention to how fragile that set piece may or may not be. So there’s I suppose some of that and that’s you know, in my job now it’s the same kind of thing, you know, a designer or a client will come and say here’s. The finished thing that I want, but we have no idea how to get there. And so much like an architect or a scenic, you know, Carpenter, you’re kind of figuring out the behind the scenes elements, and, the data architecture and the data structures that are supporting that end piece. So, and hopefully when you’re done, it’s not fragile and it’s sustainable and it’s scaleable. Just like you would want from, you know, a scenic piece in a theater.
Anthony Lamot: I love how you meticulously broke that down, and the abstraction layer, that provide some similarity between something as varied as being a carpenter in a theater industry marketing.
Aaron Beatty: Yeah. There’s I mean, the only difference is I’m not using any trig or anything like that that’s just reserved for when I’m helping my 13 year old with your homework, but everything else, you know, I haven’t had to touch that kind of stuff as part of the, there’s very little math although, you know, starting to get into AI, and language models. And, and there’s a ton of math and calculations involved in that. So who knows, I may have to start picking that up too.
Anthony Lamot: It’s it’s interesting that you mentioned that because I was gonna ask for Engage Evolution, the company you started relatively recently. Do you already have a sense of this is going to be our focus? Whether it’s functionally what you wanna do in Marketing Cloud, or maybe you focus in terms of types of customer you want to serve. Do you have an idea already what your ICP is and so on?
Aaron Beatty: So, yeah, I mean, we are founded as a Salesforce Marketing Cloud partner and really focused in, on that whole suite of software. So, you know, that will, I’m sure change and, you know, if we leave it up to Salesforce, I’m sure it will change names another three or four times just in the next year. But, but, you know, so that’s you know, what used to be Pardot, what used to be ExactTarget, you know, and Data Cloud and all the other pieces that are part of quote unquote Marketing Cloud is where we focus. And, and as far as verticals, I got a lot of advice when I started that I really needed to focus in on a vertical like, pick your lane, and I felt like that was good advice and also really difficult advice to follow because I have a lot of friends working in a lot of different industries and I’d like to be able to help them out kind of wherever they are. And if they’re using Marketing Cloud as are, I have some kind of insight or best practices and at least what I think they should be doing with their platform. And so, you know, right out of the gate I had, you know, financial services clients, I had nonprofit, I had some commercial and… you know, as long as you can speak the language of those different verticals, the solution and can have a lot of similarities. It’s just, the kind of code-switching you’re using in your language to discuss it. So are you talking about subscribers or are you talking about constituents? Are you talking about fundraising or you’re talking about development or you’re talking about sales. And there’s a ton of overlap on all those different kinds of code words that those different industries use. But at the end of the day, you know, the solutions in Marketing Cloud are going to be largely, you know, based on the same structures and platform capabilities that you have on any vertical. So… that’s a long winded way to say no. I haven’t really landed on a single vertical and, you know, as a start up, it’s you know, it’s gonna be hard for me to say no if somebody wants my help because they’re in, you know, not my core vertical or whatever. So that’s how it’s played out so far.
Anthony Lamot: And vertical could have been part of SEP, but I also know there are some who have an affinity for a certain segment like enterprise mid market. So that’s also…
Aaron Beatty: Yeah, that too. Yeah. And, and you know, it tends to be, I guess smaller, and more mid market, but, you know, we have a couple of, pretty large clients with some pretty complex setups… and, you know, a lot of times the solutions are still kinda the same. I mean, the focus, you know, is always going to be in terms of at least in terms of Marketing Cloud. Like how do you set this thing up in such a way that the, you know, perhaps just a marketer like a business user is able to get in there and get what they need without needing to be able to write SQL or, you know, do other things, that is not in most marketers bag of tricks. And so, you know, there’s as, you know, there’s a variety of products out there that help, with those kinds of things and services that help with that kind of thing. But it’s also from how you use structure in architect. The entire solution has to be, I think from that point of view first, how do you make it easy to use because of the inherent complexity, in the platform?
Anthony Lamot: Yeah, absolutely. Although I will say, I’m grateful for that complexity if not for it in our company will probably not exist, right? Yeah, it jokes aside, we have, I mean, I really resonated when you said there are code words for certain industries. So, for instance, when we talk with insurance companies, I’ll be more, you know, more likely to be talking about whether it’s a direct model across all of policies. Whereas if you talk with maybe higher education, we’re talking about advancement programs. But ultimately, what we do for instance, is a horizontal and it’s just finding those code words and relate into it. And I almost feel sometimes that and this might be interesting for those who are listening who are considering or already parting with Salesforce, when you’re parting with Salesforce, they’re all of guidance on being vertical specific. However, I feel that’s more because that suits Salesforce very well because they’re at this scale. If they want a significant capture time, they have to have that whole super vertical focus specific narrative. And that sometimes doesn’t make sense for other companies who are truly horizontal or, you know, aren’t even at a scale to have a strong vertical specific motion.
Aaron Beatty: Right. Yeah. It’s I mean, yeah, I think in some ways it’s partly due to just how Salesforce is structured. You know, their account execs and, you know, the people that work there. They have, you know, different verticals that they work in different size and scales that they work in and it’s helpful that way. And then, I think clients and customers also kind of force the conversation into that as well for better. And I think sometimes for worse because, you know, if I let’s say I work for a nonprofit and I’m looking for a tool to do forms, for example, I am in my, you know, looking at like seo type stuff and I’m looking for a product that does that. I’m not gonna look for the best form product out there. I’m gonna look for a nonprofit focused form. And so, I think that’s probably unnecessarily limiting in some ways because you’re looking, you know, specifically for your vertical under the assumption that it needs to be specific to your vertical or might have different tools or functionality. And, and I think too that clients want, they kinda want to know that you have a solution that’s just for them. And so saying well, you know, sales is pretty close to a nonprofit that’s trying to get donations, you know, or something like that. There, there is a lot of similarity in that. Just like there’s a lot of…
Anthony Lamot: The same idea that way.
Aaron Beatty: Well, exactly. No, they don’t, and higher-ed is the same like thinking of higher-ed and the context of sales. And in the context of trying to convince potential students to come to your college or university. I mean, that is, it is sales that, you know, they don’t want to think of it that way. But so there’s a lot of cross vertical and cross industry expertise that I think is going to waste maybe a little bit or not paid attention to just because it’s not specific to that vertical. And, and so, yeah, I mean, part of, you know, working on, the consulting side of it is learning to do the code switching so that when you speak to those things, you can translate it into their language. And then, they hear those code words and they go okay, they understand what we do. And then, and then you can have a meaningful conversation from there.
Anthony Lamot: Yeah, it certainly is a great way to build a report, Aaron, you’ve as we mentioned, have had about a decade of experience with Marketing Cloud. If you think back of the many projects you’ve done, can you think back of what was your favorite, or one of your favorite projects?
Aaron Beatty: Yeah. There’s a few that come to mind. I’m trying not to let like a recency effect here impact my answer because I just found some exciting solutions, for a client that was a lot of fun, but I think overall.
Well, I’ll go with, I worked with Teespring a while ago and they, they’ve kind of marked their business since I worked with them, but at the time they really were just kind of a custom teacher print shop. And, and now actually they’ve changed names. I think they’re just Spring now. But anyway, their request was they wanted an e-mail that could go out that would be personalized for people. And so what we ended up doing is writing a lot of AMPscript which is as, you know, the, you know, native one of the native languages for Marketing Cloud. And then I think there was some sequel involved behind the scenes. But basically it was an e-mail that sent each person their own unique e-mail and it would populate the e-mail with the top selling T-shirts of the different categories from which they had most often purchased. And so each person that received an e-mail was gonna get their own unique e-mail not even like based on a segment, it was really kind of a one to one thing just based on having access to the catalog and then having access to purchase data and then having access to the, you know, most popular shirts that were selling. So that was really that was a really fun one. And one of those that was like lots of late nights trying to get the e-mail to do the thing. And then finally like four in the morning, you get the thing, to populate correctly. And it’s just, you know, it’s amazing when you get to show the client the next day kind of a thing. So that was really fun. And really most of the really fun projects that I’ve had have been along those lines in kind of figuring out, how to increase segmentation and get closer to having a one to one experience on the e-mail versus saying you are one of, you know, 200,000 people in the segment to really treat each person as an individual based on their data. And that’s been kind of the holy grail, in e-mail marketing. And also something that’s been ridiculously difficult to do.
Anthony Lamot: I can imagine. And by the way I can confirm that that Teespring has been renamed Spring. I just looked it up but, it’s a cool brand, and it sounded like you’re really, you reached or at least approximated very closely at one to one communication. I suppose maybe people, who did similar, you know, purchases and similar product categories with that brand, they might have still gotten somewhat similar recommendations if not the same, but share with us like, why were the all mites necessary? So, what were the bottleneck in getting to that one on one communication?
Aaron Beatty: I think it’s probably part of that is just my, you know, I feel like there’s probably a bit of impostor syndrome there and that when I go to develop or build something, I feel like, well, you know, I’m like a junior developer, like a junior engineer, like, I can get by, I can make it work but it tends to be a lot of trial and error like, you know, you write the code, and it comes close, it almost does it or it just gives you error after error and you just can’t get to the point where it’s actually… you know, making it all the way through and displaying a preview properly. So, so I think it’s I think for me, it’s a lot of that, and who knows, you know, maybe your most experienced engineers and developers are exactly the same way. But, I envision somebody in my mind’s eye like a really experienced developer just sitting down and just from their brain directly, into the code. And they just write the exact code and then they hit, you know, send and it’s perfect. Like that’s. In my brain that’s how somebody that really knows what they’re doing would do it. And for me, it’s lots and lots of trial and error. And so, that ends up being late nights working on stuff.
And by the way, not working late because it’s there’s like a deadline that needs to be hit, but mostly because I’m like in the zone, you know, like I’m making progress. I’m really close to getting it and I’m having fun doing it. And so I lose track of time. And then I look up and I’m going, it’s time for my daughter to wake up and get on the bus or, you know, so, it’s more from that. Just like being like really focused in on something, until you crack it.
Anthony Lamot: No, I definitely recognize that feeling. I don’t do any coding anymore these days.
But in the early days for DESelect, even I did and it, it’s definitely a good medium to enter that state of flow as psychologists would call it. And I do think by the way as it as a, you know, a little side, no, I do think even the best engineers have to do this kind of trial art or something to that works organic. I don’t think anyone can just, you know, A to Z type out a whole piece of functional code that will be probably like a freak of a person. Yes. But what I’ve always found helpful is to, rather than just starting to come up with a good architecture breakdown functionality into modules and then work my way through those modules. And, and when you de, structured like that, then… there’s a lot less frustration, and iterations afterwards.
Aaron Beatty: Yeah, yeah. I would agree with that. I, I’m not always as good at doing that, but I definitely have a smoother workflow, when I have a properly documented plan with requirements and, you know, goals and, you know, pseudo code prior to just kinda hopping in. And then, you know, saving early and often and saving iterations, of codes so that I can go back a step or two if I need to or if I break something, I’m just not always as good at being that organized. And sometimes I just want to hop in and get my hands dirty.
Anthony Lamot: Sure. Well, I still have to stay with this example of this project a little bit long because I’m kinda curious what kind of, what do the data architecture look like? Because I’m trying to sort of imagine what do you need to do a communication like that? So presumably, you need to store per customer their most favorite product categories. So that is based on purchase data, maybe with some sequel updates into a table. But then you want to personalize based on layer product. So do you load a product catalog and does that, is that linked to a content?
Aaron Beatty: Yeah. So I mean, I think you, I think you kinda talked it out there. So it’s largely that. So, the main thing that you need, is a product catalog and, you know, if that catalog has, you know, predefined categories. So like, in their implementation, I think they had like, you know, there’s like patriotic tee shirts, there are like music T-shirts. There are tee shirts by like keywords. So like, you know, if you search for teacher, you might get a, you know, a bunch of T-shirts for what it’s like to be a teacher. And if it’s if you search for engineer, then you might get a bunch of different kinds of funny shirts for engineer. So it was a lot of like keyword based products in a product catalog. And then they always had an image that they would show on their website for all the T-shirts. So I had access as to all of that. So between that and, the transactional data that’s really it. And then, and then the sequel is just looking for each person, their last X purchases and then looking at the categories of T-shirts that they purchased, and then trying to kind of discern their top, you know, however many categories based on whatever it is that we’re trying to do. So sometimes you can just use that… implicit preference based on what they’re purchasing. I have had some situations that are kinda similar to that where we’ve been able to combine the transactional… data along with the preference data from their like preference center, and then combine that with their viewing data based on like the things that they’re looking at on the website and then trying to kind of combine all of that through a series of SQL queries, or what have you to try to kinda guess the top things that somebody might be interested in. And usually, you know, the longer ago that they did that the less impact it’s going to have on your final scores and that kind of stuff. So you can make it as complicated as you want to. But it’s usually some semblance, of those pieces of data that you re-combine into an e-mail…
Anthony Lamot: It’s also interesting that you can combine implicit and explicit preferences. And I would wonder then what actually makes more impact if you would, afterwards, if you would like AB test it and see if people respond more to their explicit or implicit preferences. I’m gonna guess implicit.
Aaron Beatty: Yeah, probably, yeah, because I think, you know, it’s hard to get really granular when you’re doing explicit because, you know, you can, you only want to show so many options on your page like you wouldn’t want, like if we go back to the Teespring example and let’s say they’ve got a 1,000 categories of T-shirts, you know, you’re not going to have them sift through all 1,000 categories and say, yeah, I like cowboy merchandise and my wife’s a teacher. So I like teacher stuff or, you know, like that’s gonna be really hard to find but you might be like, well, they like T-shirts versus hats. So like you might be able to combine the more broad categories with their implicit… either browsing behavior or abandoned shopping cart type stuff plus the stuff that they actually bought. And, and I think the thing that’s hard with that to really get right, which probably nobody does is like when is somebody gonna buy something one time for a specific use versus that’s the thing that they like to buy? You know, like if I’m on if I’m on the home shopping page and I bought a set of sheets or something like that, that’s probably not going to be something I’m gonna buy all the time. It doesn’t mean I just love buying sheets. It means I needed to set of sheets. I bought them. Now, I’m done with that. I don’t wanna keep getting emails about my next favorite sheets because I just bought them. So like it’s hard to, sometimes it’s hard, to square those edges and figure out… what’s actually gonna make sense in the ultimate e-mail and that’s it’s probably impossible to get right right now, but you can, you know, kinda take a stab at it.
Anthony Lamot: Now for Teespring, they probably constantly have new content available. So how do you make sure that you can actually show the last category winners, to those customers? Is it integrate with some kind of external CMS or is there like a process of constantly updating the latest image for the coolest new shirts? How does that work?
Aaron Beatty: Yeah. I think… this has been, it’s been a hot second. So I don’t remember all the details for them specifically, but generally speaking, you know, if we’re looking at top products, you know, it’s likely not going to include anything that’s brand new because there needs to be data to support that. It’s a hot product meaning enough purchase history or whatever to say. Okay, this is a thing that people like. And so it ends up just being, you know, in Marketing Cloud parlance, it ends up being a data extension that’s getting updated every, you know, probably a day or two with the current most popular items of the different categories. And then you take it from there. So that’s at least how that one worked to my recollection.
Anthony Lamot: All right. Thanks for sharing. We’ll talk about hot products. Let’s shift the conversation a bit to all the stuff we heard at Dreamforce. Salesforce has and continues to make major investments in their data cloud. That’s the name of their CDP, formerly known as genie, formerly known as Salesforce CDP, formerly known as Salesforce 360. But where do you ultimately see Data Cloud going? What do you think about that product category? And what do you see in the market?
Aaron Beatty: Yeah. I mean bringing it to specifically Data Cloud or Data Cloud for marketing. I think it’s definitely where they are wanting to bring the product. I mean, it certainly seems like they’re making a lot of investment into that tool and… I hate to say at the expense of, a, like marketing cloud engagement or something like that, but it does kinda seem like a lot of the energy and, you know, the new AI based tools and, you know, marketing GPT and all that it, you would expect it, I think to be in Marketing Cloud engagement or Marketing Cloud account engagement. And instead it’s in Data Cloud. So definitely they’re making a push to make that platform really attractive. And, you know, announcing that you can now get what amounts to a free trial, of the Data Cloud and kind of taking a look at it basically giving people, you know, their first taste is free for that. You know, the downside of that product right now is that it’s not an inexpensive license and it, it’s at current is really, it seems to me like it’s mostly a way, to solve for how difficult it can be in Marketing Cloud to get segments. And so, it’s a way for Salesforce to sell a product to make that part, of another one of their products a little easier to use. But they are, you know, rapidly advancing, the capability of that tool and I think, the kind of end user… the way that it’s being framed is more, you know, you’ve got your CRM data, but your CRM data is and everything you’ve also got data on the web and you’ve got data based on your social networks, and you’ve got data from all of your advertising. And so you’ve got all these pieces of data in addition to CRM and that, that’s a place where you can bring it all together and create profiles and kind of flatten the data and then activate it through journeys or through… let’s see what it’s called now Marketing Cloud personalization… or back into CRM and so… I don’t know. I’m really torn on it. I think it’s gonna grow into a thing that’s gonna be really attractive for folks, but it’s a little bit of a hard sell at the moment for at least most of the smaller organizations. It’s you know, it’s a pretty big lift.
Anthony Lamot: That’s fair. I think. And for those more well-versed in the Salesforce ecosystem, we all know that Salesforce platform really consist of often different infrastructure, different databases because of the acquisitions it has done over the years. What I do find exciting is that there’s going to be, well, hopefully you’ll become a common ground for all these platforms which will make integration a lot easier if not just completely unnecessary in case of certain capabilities. But I think there’s still some where, you know, there’s still some road to be travel before we get there.
Aaron Beatty: Yeah, yeah, I think so. I think, for those of us that rely on this ecosystem for our livelihood, it’s still an open question for where we should be investing our time and effort and, you know, training and, you know, certifications and all that kind of stuff like where are things headed? It definitely, you know, just based on the things that Salesforce has been saying, it definitely feels like data cloud is one of those areas where, you know, to your point, it’s a common ground for development and, you know, the newer stuff is all coming out of, that same platform. So, I think that’s where things are headed. But man, there’s just so much existing technical structure and depth in all of these other tools that for Salesforce as a company, I don’t know how they begin to bring all that stuff together… but yeah, I think that’s going to be an important part of, their strategy.
Anthony Lamot: Absolutely. Another thing we heard a little about a Dreamforce is AI, it was kinda hard to escape that phrase. You already alluded to the phrase earlier to start a conversation although maybe were you were rather referring to your personal use of AI, I’m not sure.
Aaron Beatty: I mean, it’s definitely right now, it’s definitely the buzz word dire, right? And, you know, my standing joke was walk around and go, who’s AI? Why does everybody keep talking about AI? But yeah, I mean, yeah, it’s inescapable, it’s definitely blown up obviously in the last year with chat GPT and then all the other tools, that have come around as a result. I am of the opinion, that it’s I think it will get us to a place where we can really do that one-to-one marketing engagement. And I think it’s really gonna expedite… that transition like I, you know, I referred earlier is the kind of, the holy grail of art marketing is to be able to have, a marketing segment of one and not have to group people together into these giant groups. And so the scale of data processing, and thinking and I use that term either in the, you know, the sense of a human doing it in the sense of an artificial intelligence doing it. But the, with all the tools and capability we’ve had so far, you just, you don’t have the time and resources, to have a segment of one. So it’s a short hand that you create segments and put people that are similar together under the assumption that they’re going to behave roughly similarly. And yeah, I think we’re just going to be able to get to the point where it’s literally, just this is marketing, for Aaron bad. And it’s based on what we know about Aaron bad and what we know triggers him. And whether he’s on his phone on TikTok or Facebook, or whether he’s on e-mail and we know he’s taken these steps in these actions and what’s gonna be the next action that’s going to be most likely to get him closer to our goal. And so, I think we’re gonna get there pretty quick and that’ll be, really great from a marketing perspective and as a consumer perspective, really scary because… as good as marketers are and as good as algorithms are at pushing our buttons, it’s just gonna get better or worse depending on how you.
So, yeah, that’s gonna be that’s gonna be really interesting, to see that happen. And, and from the marketing perspective be part of making that happen.
Anthony Lamot: Have you also personally doubled a lot with trying out AI tools or tricks with chat?
Aaron Beatty: I mean, I definitely, you know, I alluded earlier to being kind of like, you know, probably imposter syndrome, but just kind of feeling like a junior engineer in, some cases. And, and having a tool that can help me proof read that can help me write code faster than I can on my own or faster than I can with a quick stack exchange, search or Google search. It’s it’s really beneficial from that perspective. And then being, a very small company and then having all the responsibilities of, you know, building a website, having support tools, doing, you know, accounting and all the other things that are really just a function of owning a business. There’s a lot of help that I can get, from tools for copy, writing, for image creation, for writing outlines, for presentations. I mean, on and on, there’s a ton, of benefit to those tools. And then, you know, even on the project management side, we use internally a tool called motion that uses some AI tricks to basically manage and organize the tasks that you have do and putting them on, your calendar based on the time that you have available. So there’s some internal like uses of tools like that are really helpful for time management. And then I’m currently taking a class at MIT remote… for large language models and AI and kind of how to build your own. And, and one of the things that I’d like to do is to start to build some tools based on all of the documentation that I have, all of our kind of internal wiki, best practices and things like that and seeing if we can build something either for internal use or something we could share with, our client partners, and offer them something that can, where they can look at our kind of database of best practices and pull out the information that they need via one of those tools.
Anthony Lamot: Amazing! like some kind of marketing cloud knowledge base with which you can interact through natural language?
Aaron Beatty: Yes. Yeah. So I feel like that’s kind of, the first phase of that. I feel like longer term. I think there is going to be a need to have some tools that will do kind of what I was referring to with the one to one marketing. And, you know, if you take that thought out to its logical conclusion… where I have some kind of database data warehouse data, lake, I get lost in all the terminology, but you have a bunch of data somewhere and then you have some AI tools that sit on top of that to help you to figure out this cookie was when he went to this website. And this, you know, transaction was also Aaron because that’s tied to his credit card number. And, you know, some kind of AI that’s making sense of the data. And then maybe an additional layer of AI that sits on that to kinda analyze it from a, almost a psychological perspective like, a human behavior perspective, plus marketing. This is like they did these things. Now. They’re most likely, you know, kind of getting into generative or predictive AI like this is their next most likely thing that either we want them to do to increase profits or we want them to do to donate to our calls, or we want them to do to go to our university or, you know, whatever the use case is and then to send them a message through whatever channel makes the most sense to try to move them, you know, one step closer to that goal. And if you’ve got a system that can do that, then you don’t really need much in the way of an AI. You don’t really need much in the way of like a preplanned journey or automation. It’s really just the system kind of looking at each person and seeing if there’s any communication we can send to them that will increase the odds of them doing what we want them to do. So.
Anthony Lamot: It actually ties in to some stuff we do as well. We are already integrating a bunch of AI capabilities, you know, into our product. In fact, for this segment, we are already in alpha with people using natural language to create segments and not just that generates the SQL but it’s actually, you know, visible in our EDI. So also non technical users can really understand what’s going on. So it’s kinda cool because we just want to integrate speech to text so soon you’ll be able to just shout at your laptop to build a segment. I can, to do that.
Aaron Beatty: Right. I already do that. Actually, it just doesn’t listen. It’ll so that’ll be great. I’ll be like hang it, do this thing. It’ll be like, okay, it’s done. I’d be like great. That was.
Anthony Lamot: I can see, I can see you go“why don’t’ you listen?” and then it tries to explain very meticulously why it’s not listening.
But one one thing that, that’s also interesting to me is doing more campaign planning and optimization that’s what we’re doing with Engage two people using it now to plan their campaigns, making sure the segments are not being over-engaged with or over-saturated, right? Marketing frequency. But we’re now also introducing not generative but predictive either to allow people to still set rules but to also let the system come up with an ideal send volume per contact. And then even beyond that, thinking about maybe the marketer opens the platform and we can just go hey grade up on all those campaigns. But did you know this specific audience is under served? And then once this, these are the commonalities. And then two, these are recommendations, that we would give to you to do campaigns around like to do a campaign around this product category, probably have this kind of response. So we’re not there yet, but I do think that’s a really exciting vision to work towards. And I think that’s a bit the future of marketing. You wanna offer this… mission control center to marketing operations folks so they can much faster make decisions, and work out your planning. I think that’s really interesting.
Aaron Beatty: Yeah, yeah, no, I think we’re just at, the beginning, of what’s going to be available there. Because if you take, you know, what you just mentioned out as a kind of natural next step, you know, there’s already, you know, chat GPT, and other tools like, you know, Midjourney, and others that can start to create content given a specific tone. And so if you have, a brand tone or a language that your brand uses, but also you wanna make your language unique to the segment that you’re speaking with, you know, it’s almost like earlier when you’re talking about code-switching, for different verticals. It’s kinda the same idea you could do that, for your segments too and still maintain a brand voice, but have it match who you’re trying to talk to. And so you could certainly ask a copywriter to do that. And I’m sure the results would be fabulous. The challenges is the volume of requests and the quantity of segments that you might end up having. And so if you have a tool that can assist with that, even if it’s a first draft, to do that, and kind of go the rest of the way or maybe 80 percent of the way to generating the actual content and then rely on the human being for the last 20 percent to make sure that, you know, there’s not a crazy, you know, third arm or sixth finger… on image and you know, that kind of stuff. And that’ll get better with time too. So, yeah, I think it’s gonna be amazing.
Anthony Lamot: You mentioned that because what I recently did is so, in our team now, I’m still doing a little of enablement and a lot of product knowledge still sits with me. So one of the things, I enjoy doing too is sort of educating our own team. And since we also want to better speak to those codes, to use that same terminology, right? So to have more specific language, I started a little project where I was verticalizing some of our internal documentation. So we have very extensive internal documentation on our products, they use cases and then how that goes into benefits. And I CP, and all that good stuff. But I didn’t have any industry specific knowledge. So what I did was I opened a new session, I pay for the subscription have or significantly better point then I just, yeah, and I just went to our website and I did copy paste all dumped it into like, hey, this is what we do. Read the website and it just reads it. And then I said, okay, now try to think of typical use cases for marketing operations in insurance. And so then, okay, and I do a little bit of fact check like does it make sense? As I understand at I’m, trying to do, okay, now merge what we’re trying to do and explain me in insurance language, what we’re trying to achieve, right? And then I still edited a little bit, but I made that part of our internal documentation. And I’m just going through our, I started with insurance because that’s one of our typical verticals but there’s a number of verticals we serve. So now I’m doing that one by one. So I thought it was a really good use case to use something. Yeah.
Aaron Beatty: Yeah, that’s cool. I mean, and otherwise, it’s overwhelming with the amount of, you know, if you were gonna take that information and create like one pagers, for conferences or take that information and create an e-mail or have a, you know, a subsection or landing page of
Aaron Beatty: And so if you have a tool that can help kind of, you know, I like the thought of maybe, you know, you put in the first 10 percent, the AI handles the middle 80 percent and then you handle the last 10 percent. Like I like that, it’s like a weird version of the Pareto principle, but, you’ve, got the chat GPT doing like the middle 80 percent of the work and that’s a huge time saver and it’s generally pretty good like, you know, with the proper questions and the right language and the right information the results, are pretty good and you can give it really detailed, you know, requests for what you wanna do.
Anthony Lamot: I did something similar for our page and kind of coming up with target personas and customer avatars and things like that for our business. And, you know, it was telling me that marketing Mike, is looking for help with XYZ and we call the persona “Marketing Mary”. I got Marketing Mary out of chat GPT, and, but like you can dig into, you know, what are, so for this personas, what’s there? What’s their greatest fear? What’s the, what are the things that they’re terrified about? Why? What are the things that they’re that are driving them to make decisions? And so you can start asking it some really interesting questions about what might be driving some of the psychological behavior and like motivations of somebody making a purchase. And, you know, it’s hard to know whether the results are accurate or whether they’re you know, true to somebody’s like psychological needs. But when I read it, I’m like, okay, yeah, I mean, that sounds right? Like I can see myself in that person’s shoes and think, yeah, I’m scared to fall behind in technology or I’m scared with joining with a partner that, that’s gonna just take my money and run or they’re gonna, you know, they’re not gonna give me the service that they promised upfront. And, and so, you know, it’ll lay all that stuff out which you can then turn into marketing and kind of target those behaviors and those thoughts with, you know, we’re gonna solve those problems and not just here’s our product here’s what it does because, you know, most people don’t buy stuff that way. So, yeah, it’s cool. It’s an amazing tool.
Anthony Lamot: You also mentioned Midjourney, I’ve heard several people mentioned I haven’t had looked at it yet, is it significantly better to write content? Because I do find GPT to content it generates can be a little bit generic and dry.
Aaron Beatty: Yeah. So mid journey is more of an image creation tool. It’s and it is, yeah.
Anthony Lamot: Yeah. You referred earlier to some other tool then? My mistake.
Aaron Beatty: Yeah, I can, I did refer to Midjourney but I’m thinking of it more in the context of, you know, if you’re going to build an e-mail or a blog or whatever, and you need both to generate an outline or some content. And then generally speaking, you’re going to have some kind of imagery to go with it. And so Midjourney is a really great tool for that. The weird thing about it though is that it runs through disco. And so it’s a little weird that you have to download like a effectively a chat client and discord, and then install the Midjourney bought. And then you can ask it to do things but, it does a phenomenal job and it, and it’s it craves details. So you can tell it. In fact, you can use ChatGPT to generate a prompt for Midjourney and in get it’s help to get exactly what you’re looking for it to create. So it’s great. But yeah, for me, those are the primary two tools that I use. I know there’s probably, you know, millions of other options out there at this point, but I’m like you, I paid, for, the fancy, your access and, you know, to have API access and I have ChatCPT for and it’s so good. I haven’t really needed, to try any of the other tools yet.
Anthony Lamot: Awesome. Well before we round up, I was wondering Aaron if you have any parting advice you worked with so many customers. You’re taking on new customers? What is something a new Salesforce Marketing Cloud customers should be aware of? Or something like what some good advice you can give to avoid some common pitfalls?
Aaron Beatty: I think, the thing that I see happen all the time… is that… a lot of times a client, a customer will be looking to replace their CRM and build out marketing cloud and do all that kind of all at the same time like they get a nice big budget or grant or whatever to go build this thing out. And what I see happen all the time that drives me a little bit crazy is a ton of time effort and resources will be put into the CRM side of that equation. And then the after thought is, well, what are we gonna do with that information? Once we get it all centralized? And so, you know, inevitably, you know, marketing cloud or some kind of outbound communication thing is one of the systems that will utilize that CRM data. And so as somebody that works in that space, it’s always frustrating when, you know, let’s say a company has a 1,000,000 dollar budget. You know, they’re gonna want to spend as close to a 1,000,000 dollars as they can on the CRM. And then they go, yeah, we also want to be able to send emails and so that ends up being the 10,000 dollar project to the 990,000 dollar CRM project. And it, you know, not to say they should be 50 50, but they’re definitely should be a lot more investment in the, what are you gonna do with the data? And in addition to that, I think it’s important to consider what are you gonna do with the data first? And, and for a lot of these setups it’s last, it’s, the initial investment and time and resources, is spent in what data do we have? Where is it? And how do we structure and organize it so that it’s all in the same place that’s effectively what you’re doing with the CRM, but they’re not thinking about what are we gonna do with it from there? How are we gonna use it? You know, what are our use cases? And, and so I feel like a lot of places get that backwards. They need to, they need to do that first, and then go work on.
Anthony Lamot: I think that’s very sound advice. I would also second that by saying that marketing cloud ultimately is a data driven product. And so you do have to start thinking about the data first. And then all the good stuff can follow. If you start with that, Aaron, it’s been a pleasure. It’s again a great pleasure, to speak with you. I feel there’s so much more we can explore but our time.
Aaron Beatty: Absolutely. Thanks so much for having me. It was great.
Discover how our platform instantly optimizes your Marketing Cloud
Anthony Lamot: Timo, welcome to the show.
Timo Kovala: Thanks, thanks, Anthony. Happy to be here.
AL: Absolutely. It’s a pleasure to have you. It’s been a while since I’ve had a fellow European on the show.
TK: Yeah, I’ve noticed it as well that the Salesforce ecosystem can be a bit American or Anglo-centric. So it’s nice to be part of the wider audience, so to speak.
AL: For sure. Yeah. And we do love to mix it up. I guess recently a lot of participants on the show were American because I’m based in the US, but it was great to run into you at Dreamforce. For our guests on the show today, can you tell us a bit about your background and what you currently do at Capgemini?
TK: Yeah. So currently, I’m a marketing architect at Capgemini, meaning that I work with clients, and try to help them build or design a roadmap forward in data-driven marketing and sales alignment. But before my time in Capgemini, I worked in Salesforce consultancy. Before that, I worked in marketing consulting. And prior to that, I was in-house. So I have both in-house and consulting background.
AL: So, you made the switch as well from working in-house within the industry to consultancy. What was that like?
TK: I’ve been a hiring manager before in my current role. So I basically hired all my teammates from an in-house background. And at least in marketing, I see that’s the way to go. You get the best professionals. And this is not disrespect to people who have been fully born and bred consultants. But I myself prefer having this practical expertise because that’s the one thing that you cannot train by going to training and doing consultancy work. You get the perspective of being in-house, and that makes you position in a special way to accommodate the customer and go to their shoes.
AL: I can totally relate to that. In fact, I’ve often observed in the ecosystem that amongst code system integrators, there are sometimes those who do purely consultancy and they are really good at integration projects. And then there are a number of marketing agencies who know all about campaigns, but I wouldn’t let them do an implementation. Frankly, it is rare to see that mix.
One of the things I like about partnering with Capgemini is that Capgemini has this mix of practical hands-on experience as marketers within their team. But they also have the more typical consulting IT integration background so they can actually get the system up and running in a way that has a good architecture, but also practically enough so that marketers can get campaigns out of the door very easily.
TK: Yeah, definitely.
AL: I also noticed on your LinkedIn profile that you are now a “top marketing analytics voice.” Can you tell us a bit about that? Like just first of all, what does that mean? And how can someone become a top voice on LinkedIn?
TK: Yeah. I mean, that was a surprise to me as well. It’s a recent addition. LinkedIn used to have the influencer tags, but those were reserved for real influencers with 50,000 followers and for, I don’t know, Forbes or Bloomberg and stuff like that. So it’s nice that they added this midway step, which is the “top voice”. And that’s basically for anybody who is active on LinkedIn, sharing their thoughts, and engaging in discussions.
There are AI-generated articles. They use GPT to create these mock-up articles that have sections. So it’s always a post written by AI and divided into sections. And then one day I got a LinkedIn notification that, hey, you have been selected to write for one of these articles. “Okay. What is this?” And then I went to check, and it was something about marketing attribution. “Okay, I can write about that”. And then I started writing about it. I wrote some other articles. So basically, it’s written articles, and then you comment on the sections so you can challenge the AI-generated stuff and provide real-life examples. So I think it’s a really innovative way of using AI and structuring thoughts and getting the community engaged.
AL: I actually have been getting emails from them for months, but I’ve just been ignoring them because I wasn’t sure what they were about. And I was also wondering if it would be too generic. But now I can see there’s a clear benefit to filling in those ends.
TK: You can actually click it and check the other articles. And I mean, for sure, you could do, you could like, for example, segmentation and personalization and these kinds of areas. But yeah.
AL: I’ll definitely look at it. Yeah, I’ve been, I guess, nominated to write or answer on marketing automation topics and then a variety of other topics. So I’ll have to check it out. Thanks for the tip. That’s cool.
Well, let’s bring the conversation back from LinkedIn to Marketing Cloud. You’ve been in that field for a while. What was your most interesting project so far?
TK: Well, I’ve been working with both the OG Marketing Cloud and Account Engagement, which is Pardot for OG players like myself. This is also for people who work at Salesforce, maybe not the specific account executives who deal with these. But they sometimes say Pardot is for B2B and Marketing Cloud is for B2C. And that’s not really the case. I’ve worked with Pardot users who are like consumer companies or selling direct to consumer. And the other way around, and that’s actually one of the interesting cases for me was working with one of these multinational manufacturing companies that was using Marketing Cloud. So you’re selling like 100,000 multi-million-dollar projects, you have lead management and you have a complex sales process, but you’re still using Marketing Cloud. So what’s the idea here? Their business was quite transactional. They were using multiple channels. They were using Marketing Cloud, advertising to a great degree. And so, they were getting the benefits. And really, I see also that the Marketing Cloud really plays well if you, if you’re really heavily invested in service. In my mind, it actually works better with Service Cloud than Sales Cloud because you can create the case as you can do interactive emails that update case statuses and whatnot. So Journey Builder and Service Cloud are really nice pals, so to speak. So I think that was really interesting case. And well, what made it also a bit interesting was that they weren’t satisfied with what was available out of the box. So they wanted to set up their own lead scoring with Marketing Cloud which was quite interesting like that’s. That’s one of the things that isn’t that easy to set up with Marketing Cloud by default.
AL: Did their lead scoring in Marketing Cloud include website data? Because that’s where usually I find there’s a bottleneck, you typically don’t want to store your web tracking data in Marketing Cloud because it will make your data extension explode.
TK: Yeah. I mean definitely, I mean if you Data Cloud, it’s a different story. You can use calculated insights for that. And it’s perfectly viable for doing lead scoring, but I really don’t recommend doing complex lead scoring. And also, I challenge the idea of lead scoring altogether. I mean, it’s basically boiling down very complex behavior into a single score and it’s the exact same reason why I hate NPS for that matter. So trying to use a single score to explain a multitude of behaviors and actions is it’s I think it’s the wrong way to go. And what you can do with data extensions is actually to take key events from the website, key milestones that you’ve identified when doing a customer journey map, that these are the points where you have to do something like a service person needs to contact them proactively or a salesperson needs to jump on the wagon, and contact the customer. So that’s I would say it’s a much more effective way. And based on feedback I’ve received then customers who’ve used lead scoring, the usual case is that the sales is quite satisfied with leads that come through contact forms, but not that satisfied with lead scoring leads because, you know, it doesn’t mean anything anymore. If there are like 50 activities that are totally unconnected to each other. What does it mean anymore? Like if you have a 500 score or a 600 score?
AL: Well, that’s an interesting topic because it’s actually something we have implemented in our business as well. I have heard very few success stories from companies regardless of their tech tac introducing lead scoring. I think there are a few thoughts I have on this subject. It can be useful especially B2B context to come up with some kind of account scoring to help prioritize activities for sales, but more for the outbound motion, not even necessarily for the inbound motion just to have an idea of what’s happening at a certain account. But in our case, I can tell a bit about how we have configured lead scoring because we see in our business other than referrals via partners and then the AppExchange and Salesforce, and just doing outbound ourselves. We do, of course, have a number of inbound. In fact, it’s a very important channel for us and we get through E-books, webinars, and of course, DESelect search application, the free app to search stuff in Marketing Cloud. But what we have to learn is that if we get leads from some of these channels like E-books or DESelect search, we call them soft leads as opposed to hard leads or leads, people who really ask for reaction like a contact form. Like the soft leads are often ready to be nurtured. And sometimes we would prefer sales to focus on a certain target list that we have rather than those soft leads. So that’s where we introduce a lead score. But I think, the main thing with the lead score is it’s super abstract.
So in our case, I think our model was implemented six months ago. Now is really the time to look back and see if it’s been useful… but I would agree it’s challenging to pull off. And there’s another thing- lead scoring is a way to prioritize which leads you should reach out to. I think most companies don’t have the luxury of having too many leads to reach out to.
TK: No, and there’s actually a better way to do that. And that’s also taking a page out of the Pardot data model. I don’t know if you know, but Pardot also has this thing called “grading” and “profile”. So grading, that’s a similar topic. Instead of customer actions deciding who is engaged and who is not, grading is about you as a company representative, defining what is the ideal customer, what is to grade a customer and what is not. It’s a great way to focus salespeople’s time on the right people, right? No customer either wants to get contacted unnecessarily. So if they are not the target customer for your product, then it’s a waste of both parties’ time.
AL: Yeah, absolutely. And this is exactly what we as a B2B company have done. So, we do an ICP refresh. So for those who don’t know, it’s an ideal customer profile. So that’s an account level in our case.
TK: That’s really fancy. Though a lot of customers or companies don’t do that kind of thing.
AL: But we have to pick our battles. I mean, we want to be hyper-focused and we know that our, ICP, obviously, it’s people use Salesforce Marketing Cloud. It can be upper mid-market or enterprise, lower mid-market SMB, you don’t even really have an SFMC but… and then there’s a few industries that […]
TK: Well, unless you’re a nonprofit, well, but that’s not an SMB but a smaller organization.
AL: And we do serve nonprofits, but those are typically much larger ones. I wouldn’t necessarily call them our ICP today, although we do serve a number of united logos there, but our ICPS will be more like insurance, banking, telecommunications… We see a growing number in RCG and then a really good one for us is automotive. A really interesting one is higher education. I’m always surprised by how many higher education clients we have. We did a press release with Cornell a while ago.
So anyway, I don’t want to babble too much about our stuff, but I just like that you pointed out the grading system and part of it because I do think that being really clear about your ICP is really important. And then now we can go back to your database and indicate what we did is, we call those accounts target accounts and pretty much all our outbound focus sits with those… now going back, to your project. So you said the interesting thing about this customer was it was a manufacturing company, but they were B2B. And regardless of that, they were using Marketing Cloud plus Service Cloud. What other things in that project stood out? you said something about them doing a lot of custom work?
TK: Well, not that much. I mean, this was just to answer your question. Honestly, it’s been a couple of years. So since I worked with that customer, so I don’t know what direction they have gone to, but, nowadays, if I were to recommend a solution, I would definitely see them as a top candidate, for Data Cloud given the complexity of the process, and all the custom metrics they were using. So like building the what they’re called customer lifetime value scores and so on. I think that’s really helpful too, I think you also talked about like providing personalization and providing data other than what you use for segmentation. So I think those kinds of tidbits of insight and data, are really helpful when you’re doing super-targeted or hyper-targeted advertising and marketing.
AL: Yeah, for sure. I think it makes a difference. And it’s also much more especially in today’s market. Today’s market is all capital efficient and sustainable.
TK: It’s not only about money. It’s about burning through your subscriber list also.
AL: Absolutely. And not just unsubscribed because it’s my experience working with clients at the majority of clients. I don’t really have unsubscribed issues anymore. Most unsubscribe rates seem to be between one and two percent. And I think that’s because it’s been such a shift towards… only doing content-based marketing which is a great positive trend for consumers all like, and I’m happy it’s happening. But the other thing that now I see people are really underestimating is, what we call unengaged subscribers. So that is to say subscribers were just never opening. And so marketers sometimes get very happy about really what the vanity metrics like “we’ve done a 1,000,000 sends”. Yeah, but I mean, are people actually engaging? So a lot of our work, and product roadmap is more geared towards audience health than just avoiding unsubscribes, but you’re totally right.
TK: And that’s even worse in B2B, I would say if the mail drops to your business e-mail even though if you subscribe to get like some kind of content like, I don’t know, attending a webinar or a white paper, you’re probably not gonna be engaged with that company for after a few months.
People don’t even care enough to click the unsubscribe button. So they will just use automated rules on the mailbox to send it to junk or something like that.
AL: That also happens. Yeah. I’m in that category. I hit the spam button very fast. This you have more in the U.S. than in Europe: the moment you’re at a certain event or they find your e-mail does they put you on mailing lists without an opt-in. For me? That’s an instant spam notification.
TK: Thank God for GDPR.
AL: Yeah, exactly. So you’ve also worked in pre-sales support. I take it this is maybe a bit more of a tricky question. But in your experience […]
TK: Depending on what you mean by “pre-sales support”, but yeah.
AL: Well, let me put it this way. If you position Marketing Cloud to a customer, how do you try to make a case for ROI? How do you think about convincing stakeholders who were considering buying Salesforce Marketing Cloud that the ROI will be significant?
TK: That’s actually a really good, difficult question when I think about the sales cases I’ve been involved in with customers thinking, for example, between different options. They have a budget in mind. So we never actually or very rarely do we get the numbers from the customer they’re expecting for the client. They’re expecting us to provide some kind of a… solution and proposal. And what would be the benefits versus costs? How do I like to go about it? Is actually discussing cost of doing nothing versus fixing the issues with Marketing Cloud. So first identifying what is wrong with the current setup and what are the sort of things that Marketing Cloud could help you with.
I think this exercise is also a really important sanity check because if there are no problems with the existing setup, don’t go with Marketing Cloud. It is a very mature tool. It has a very steep learning curve. That said, it’s also one of the most customizable and extendable products. But I mean, you’re not gonna hear that about from Salesforce because they’re the vendor, but as a consultant, I have to be there to implement it to support the customer. So I want to make sure that they’re getting the product that is the right fit for them as well.
AL: That’s absolutely true. And you’re there, of course, to act as that trusted party who can offer some objectivity. And especially because you’ve been in marketing that’s where you talk about the cost of doing nothing. And then the strength of Marketing Cloud being highly customizable, which, by the way, I totally agree. I think that’s the wonderful thing about the platform. Are there patterns that you see amongst customers that have a cost of doing nothing for certain cases where Marketing Cloud can bring added value?
TK: I think it’s all about multi-channel, or omnichannel, whichever you prefer. I think that’s the main issue. Mainly it’s about good advertising. Usually if we talk about enterprise-level customers, they almost always get Marketing Cloud Advertising included because I think it’s one of the better components of Marketing Cloud. And also like SMS mobile applications. All of these chat platforms, especially SMS.
We sometimes underestimate the power of text messages, but it’s really powerful especially in those kinds of industries that you mentioned: insurance, telecom, entertainment industry, and media, just to mention a few. And Marketing Cloud has some really good industry-specific applications and add-ons that are really great for eCommerce and also telecom and media companies. At least if you work in these certain industries, you can see that if you use any other generic multi-channel marketing platform, you’re not getting these benefits.
AL: That’s really interesting. I love Europe but I will say, now living in the U.S., I noticed that the marketing maturity in this country is very high. One of the things you see a lot here is SMS campaigns. I feel that’s really something that in Europe marketers can pick up and learn from.
TK: And I think the trust is much higher in the SMS channel, I mean, and also the engagement. This goes back to analytics which also we touch upon but you don’t get as much data, from sending SMS, but that doesn’t mean that it doesn’t work and you have to be more creative about getting the data points. Like for example, using dedicated links. Like how to do marketing attribution, like old school style.
There was this guy called Claude Hopkins who invented marketing attribution, in the U. S, I guess. And, he had different billboards or versions of billboards with different phone numbers. So you’d call a different, phone number and they were able to pick up which advertisements were more effective. And I think these kinds of guerilla tactics work really well with the SMS attribution, but you have to be more creative, that’s true. But if you can measure the effectiveness of SMS campaigns, for sure you should go for it. I think people use it too sparsely. That doesn’t mean that you want to go overboard but it’s definitely one of those special weapons in your arsenal that you should put to use.
AL: And e-mail metrics are getting less accurate with Apple restricting the information that we get back.
TK: I mean, the iOS method of basically logging everything that’s opened is causing havoc on open rates. So I wouldn’t use that as a metric anymore.
AL: Absolutely. The other thing that came to mind is that I do think attribution can be very challenging and misleading at worst. And I think it can be both in B2C or B2B. But say B2B, we may, for instance, have someone come to our website via Google. I mean, you may say this is natural search, right? But maybe in effect, what happened was that we have a great relationship with a partner like yourself and maybe you mentioned our product to a customer at a conference, and then they googled us.
But now, you know, the effort of building a relationship with a trusted partner is not being recognized. But if you just magnify that event across many different occurrences, you might think “natural search is the thing we have to double down on”. And I’m not saying we shouldn’t as a company double down on natural search. I think that’s a great channel, but I think you get the point. So, what are your thoughts on there? What are the limitations of attribution?
TK: I think you just opened Pandora’s box. Marketing attribution is one of my favorite topics. I think people sometimes have a very limited way of looking at attribution. And a lot of companies think of it as a sort of… “this or that” kind of conversation. So you have to use one or the other model. My advice? Use them all.
But there’s a perspective difference. So if you use several attribution models side by side, you get a board where you can actually sort campaigns based on key lenses. And you can use this attribution model as a way to amplify their effect in the stages of the customer life cycle, or the lead pipeline. So, for example, if you use “first touch”, you amplify the channels or the campaigns that are very good at converting or getting people to sign up for something and creating subscribers for your day, for marketing club and vice versa. If you use a model called last touch attribution, what you get is amplification on presales campaigns or campaigns that are really good at getting those last closing arguments before the sale. And once you have this a dashboard that includes them all and you name them prescriptively or descriptively, as a marketer, you can easily identify which campaigns are really good at what. And, when you have these different lenses, you get a more holistic picture. So, I like that kind of approach where you have several different attribution models working side by side.
AL: Well, and then when you do get rid of the intelligence and you’re starting to think about your next program, campaign planning. It’s more about “What are the channels that need to optimize at which step of the journey” as opposed to “What channel do I need to optimize?” It’s more about what different steps it takes to convert a customer.
TK: But it’s good to think of the different roles for the different channels. So you’re not accidentally trying to achieve something from the website that it’s not meant for. And it’s also good to validate those roles because sometimes we -and a lot of times even marketers- say that we’re masters of customer insight. But there was this one case actually in real time real life, I was working with this glazing company. They basically sold glazing to patios and apartments and so on. And what they found out was that people behave very weirdly, they don’t follow the real model for their purchase. So what they usually did, at least in Finland, was they went straight to the pricing page. That was the first thing that they went to check and qualify. So they didn’t care about “inspirational content” or comparison to competitors. They wanted to validate the price first and see if it fit their budget.
AL: Yeah, you’re thinking about models like either or top of funnel, mid-funnel, bottom of funnel. But in reality follow that the track, right?
TK: So if you use one of those, it’s perfectly fine. And it’s a great way to model the different sorts of activities along the customer journey. But please validate it first. And it makes much more sense to use a custom model that actually follows what your customers are actually doing and it’s not impossible to do. I mean this wasn’t like a super mature company. They were doing the right kind of things but they were still maturing in certain other aspects. So if they can do it, I think you can do it as well.
AL: Well, enable, maybe those models are better suited to think about your overall campaign strategy and content strategy a little bit less. So for systems, this is something that, I actually start marketing information with Pardot. I should have mentioned that earlier, not with Marketing Cloud. So I remember doing part of the implementation where people had this kind of model in mind. But, you, I think as a consultant, you don’t have to pop the bubble and make the customer aware that well, in reality, your customers are not going to float through this funnel. Logically people will jump straight to a contact form. People will go immediately to the pricing page before the “inspirational content” as you’ve put it.
Super interesting. Maybe one other thing that I was wondering about if you’ve already tried it a Dreamforce and many other of the recent Salesforce conferences, there’s a lot of talk about what app and their partnership. What set up? This is one of the things that’s less common in the U.S. or I think the U.S. can actually learn from Europe, but WhatsApp is huge in most of the world. Have you already looked into the functionality for Marketing Cloud by any chance?
TK: I don’t know, this is one of the aspects where I’m probably a bit conservative or old-fashioned, but It’s a very interpersonal channel. I haven’t ever received any advertisement for from WhatsApp, and this is actually different from their competitors. I don’t know why it is, but it’s like it has basically replaced text messages. At least in the Nordics, a lot of people have family group chats there. And, I feel that that’s one of the places where advertisement would be a bit out of place, but I’d love to see how that actually works, if it can be monetized.
AL: I feel also that text message advertising and text messaging is still very intrusive. I may be projecting my own sentiment here, but I don’t mind getting notifications about, I don’t know doctor reminders via text message. And with WhatsApp, the only use case I’ve seen so far is I use wise for my banking because I still travel a lot.
AL: Another thing that I was wondering about maybe while we’re talking about new stuff that we see at Dream Force, AI is constantly being flung around right now. What do you think about Salesforce? And what does it mean to you personally?
TK: Well, personally, I can start with that. I mean, it’s brought a lot of stuff to learn because customers are asking about it constantly if there’s an RFP. So request for proposals and information coming in quotations and stuff that I’m working on related to specially generative, AI, this is something I wanna say like basically puffing my own company or employer about it that Capgemini actually has been working with generative AI for past eight years. So that’s actually made it a lot easier for me. There’s good material available.
AL: Tell us more about that because you see Capgemini has already been working with AI for eight years.
TK: Yeah. We have this business area called “data and insights”. So those guys have been actually setting up these generative AI models based on foundational models available. And also using company-specific data. And that’s been going on, for a lot longer than what’s ChatGPT and everything that came out like a year ago. So we’ve been doing that for a lot of companies. And basically, there’s been generative AI, incorporated in different kinds of platforms and companies have been using it in-house but it’s not been broad common knowledge before chat GPT entered the market. So we were basically those kinds of hipsters. So we were in the market even before it was cool, so to speak. But coming back to your original question, how it impacts the overall ecosystem, and how it impacts people’s daily life? Do you know Amara’s law?
AL: Yeah, absolutely.
TK: Yeah. So we tend to over estimate the short term effects of technology and underestimate the effect in the long run. So I think that is the key point here. So most likely we won’t notice it in our daily life because it happens very gradually. But if we take a snapshot of how work is today, and come back to it like 10 years after afterwards, it might be something similar to thinking back like 10 years ago, like we were using websites, they were not responsive.
So I think most likely… we’ll see a T shaped model in marketing organizations. So we’ll see these AI specialists very similar to what we have with analytics. It’s basically a new specialization.
We’ll have AI marketers enter the job market, but everybody should learn the basics. And by basics, I mean, similar to everybody knowing the basics of marketing analytics, marketing attribution, data, privacy and data protection. So also the basics of how generative AI models function, what is generative AI versus other sorts of machine learning models. How are they different? How do you use different AI methods? And so on. They don’t have to know how to build one, but, you need to know what they’re meant for, how they’re using the data, and what you can expect in terms of use cases.
AL:I think it was in a McKinsey study where I read that people will not necessarily lose jobs directly to AI, but people who don’t have AI skills will be losing jobs to people who do have AI skills, and that’s going to be a challenge.
TK: Yeah. I’m going to be a bit harsher here. I’m will point out that there are certain kinds of, I would say, work mentalities that are at risk. So if you’re doing repetitive work, you’re not providing insight, and you’re not challenging the work order that you’re presented with, those are really at the risk of losing their jobs, not necessarily to AI but maybe even some process automation.
AL:Well, and I keep discovering by myself jobs that I didn’t even consider being at risk at first, or at least partially at risk. So for instance, just the other day, I asked ChatGPT to put together a new training schedule, where in the past I might have gone to a trainer or dietitian to help with stuff like that. It’s interesting how we keep finding new ways where this changes.
Speaking of change, I wanted to talk about change management. I’m sure in your consulting work, you’ve dealt with plenty of that. You’ve been on both sides. I’d love to hear from you. What are your most common change management topics that arise? And how do you mitigate them?
TK: That is something that you never hear as a consultant: “how would you approach this change management problem?” That never happens. So it’s one of those things that as a consultant, you have to develop a sense for that. We’re not talking about data issues. We’re not talking about process issues or tech issues a lot of the times.
And this comes back to the very first question about ROI. So that might actually be the root cause of not being able to use the technology that there’s simply miscommunication between, for example, IT and marketing. IT seen as a bottleneck where you have to get approval for using data, or maybe you need specialists from IT to actually use the data. It’s too difficult to utilize. This is where DESelect comes along, empowering marketers to use data by themselves.
I think that’s really at the core of change management. I think empowering people to do their jobs better and basically framing change. It’s corny to say that “change is a possibility”, but every change really is a possibility. It’s not a threat, but you really have to put yourself in that other person’s shoes, identify what are the pain points in their current process, and think how the change could actually improve that.
But also, you cannot look at the change that you’re trying to implement as purely a positive change. It’s good to be realistic. And I think especially in the rough times that we live in, people losing their jobs, being laid off and everything, it’s very important to show compassion when doing these kinds of projects and really be honest that this might actually cause some issues, and there might be some nasty consequences with this change, but we’re trying to deal with them and we’re trying to involve people to mitigate those kinds of things.
AL: Which is interesting because it seems like customers realize change will be happening but they don’t make it a topic to be addressed. Whereas the, a big part of dealing with change is actually acknowledging the challenges that will happen, and dealing with them. Would you agree with that?
TK: Yeah. I mean, for some reason, I don’t know if it’s a local peculiarity, but at least here, it seems that it’s easier to find money for tech projects than a new strategy or a change project.
AL: And what is interesting is that I’ve seen studies that most IT projects fail because of either lack of executive buying or lack of user adoption. So if you think about how companies spend millions on digital transformation, but then they don’t invest anything or very little in training and change management and organizational restructure, you kinda scratch your head and wonder “come on, this should be avoidable”. I keep saying (and this is coming from someone in tech) that the biggest issues in marketing and operations are usually organizational. They’re not technology-based.
TK: Yeah, exactly. And that’s what we keep saying, and sometimes it works, and usually that’s even a winning strategy.
So we want to stress that change is difficult and needs to be taken head-on as a challenge, but we also want to stress that change is possible. So sometimes as consultants, we focus on the negative and focus on the challenges too much. And I think that’s where you identify the professional and expert consultant who can challenge you and identify the root issues that are really causing the problem, but also to present solid solutions.
AL: I think that is very sound advice about the role that a consultant can play in managing change, while making customers aware of the opportunity it can present. If I can ask you for some other parting advice- typically I ask guests on the show for advice to newcomers to the Marketing Cloud ecosystem, but, with your architect background, I would ask a slightly different question. What would be your advice to people interested in becoming an architect eventually?
TK: Wow. That’s a difficult question, since I’m pretty new to architecture myself. But I would say… exploring different roles. I mean, the best architects I’ve met have a very generalist background and I think curiosity is really important in that area. So, if possible and whenever possible, try sales, try developer work, try front end work, try designer work, do service design workshops, do trainings, do mentoring. Whatever “new thing” you can figure out and try and see how that works, it all helps when you’re an architect because architects are all generalists in some way. Explore, be curious and spread out, become a generalist. That’s really helpful when you actually work as an architect.
AL: I think that is wonderful advice to become an architect. I think that’s just also great life advice. Timo, thank you so much for your time today. It was a pleasure talking with you.
TK: Yeah, thanks, Anthony. And if you ever want to chat about these topics again, I’m here for you. Feel free to reach out whenever.
Discover how our platform instantly optimizes your Marketing Cloud
Anthony Lamot: Hey, William. Welcome to the show.
William McMahon: It’s a great to be here.
Anthony Lamot: It’s an absolute pleasure having you over. I know we’ve been collaborating a bit over the past time, so, I feel, this visit to the show was long overdue.
William McMahon: Good, good to meet the master and the creator is.
Anthony Lamot: Appreciate it well for our audience sake. William, could you tell us a bit about your background? What led you to found Gravitai?
William McMahon: Yeah, absolutely. So I’ve been in the IT game since I was about 16 or even before then I first started programming on a Commodore 64. When I was, I think about six to eight. So I pretty much had my career mapped out for me. Started learning to code when I was very young when I was 17 in secondary school, started up my own kind of web design business. One an entrepreneurial award in Ireland for that just went into the IT career and self-taught myself business as well as it grew through many different roles from everything from engineering in coding, customer services, you name it. I kind of tried it out and it kinda kept my career going of just wanting to learn appetite to figure things out. And then one day somebody put a label on me as a solution architect and it stuck. I thought it was, a great title. So kinda went landed in my feet with ExactTarget in, I think it was 2013 or around then and it kind of switched from building websites and databases to now doing marketing and really fell in love with the power of automation, the power of marketing and have kind of started, my further career there. And really just saw when I was at ExactTarget just saw a real opportunity where clients were buying all of these expensive pieces of kit and really struggling to get the full capabilities out of them. So they were, I usually describe it as a rocket ship. They’ve bought the rocket ship to fly through the moon. They sit behind the control panel and they don’t know what buttons to press. A. So I started up Gravitai 10 years ago with that focus of being “vendor agnostic”, first off. So it didn’t really matter what technology you had. I could come in on understand your business, your processes, the systems show you how to use it, show you how to get the most out of the system and, get you launched and get you flying. And what started as me as one individual as a contractor as I first thought I was going to build a business, it became a pretty big success. We were, we got to the height of about 84 consultants working full time with us. Shrunk back down now in the current economic climate, but we’re still I think about 48 people. So it’s, kept us in the business for a few years at least and kept me, I kept me entertained as well. A lot of good projects, a lot of great clients.
Anthony Lamot: Great. Thank you for sharing. I have so many questions about that. But first off, just to be a bit of a no at all, I saw in your profile. It’s actually since 2011 that you’ve been working at ExactTarget. So time certainly flies.
William McMahon: It certainly did. It was thanks to Lego that it got me a job in ExactTarget. I went in to do an interview and I’m a massive Lego fan been collecting Lego since I was four and I went in with a little Lego figuring to the ExactTarget office to do an interview and never did marketing in my life, but I thought let’s be unique and I put the little Lego figuring down on the table and I ran the entire interview portraying to be this little lego figuring all of its characteristics, how great this Lego figurine was.
And at the end of the interview, wished, you know, thanks and, you know, best look kind of thing for this and great opportunity. And I turned to the interviewer and said, well, I want to leave the little Lego man here with me so that if I don’t get a job, at least a little bit of me is left insid the company. I got call next morning just going “When, when can you start?” And yeah, absolutely just fell into it. ExactTarget was a great company to work with which is now Salesforce Marketing Cloud, of course, but it had a great culture. It was again new business start up. And I think that also gave me the ambition and drive, to really start something with Gravitai because I was very entrepreneurial. You’re you’re pretty much hired for your entrepreneurial flare.
Anthony Lamot: Now help me understand a little bit. So I’m a huge Lego fan too. I used to have that black T-Rex if, you know what I’m talking about?
William McMahon: Yes.
Anthony Lamot: Yeah, that was amazing. But there’s probably a link between people liking to build stuff at young ages, and then ending up in marketing automation. There’s a lot of similarities I feel, but talk about ExactTarget and I won’t do all too long here because by now it is of course, Marketing Cloud engagement, even not even SMC any more officially, most people know ExactTarget as an Indianapolis based company, mostly a footprint in us. And I believe even at the time of the acquisition by Salesforce back in 2014, if I’m not wrong.
William McMahon: Yep.
Anthony Lamot: The, the footprint in Europe was somewhat limited. So, so how was that? Back then? Was it mostly UK? What kind of, yeah, what did it feel like?
William McMahon: Yeah, it was definitely like I was working pretty much on enterprise clients. So I was doing both presales and solution architecture. So going in helping the sales person sell it for stuff, a lot of them were UK and, it did, you get the odd european country after that, but it was primarily UK based clients. They could have been international clients but again headquartered primarily here in London. So, there were big deals. You know, you could be working on an opportunity for several months before it would come about and then the design and implementation. They’re usually huge large scale implementation. So your projects could last, you know, six months or even two years to go through… it. It’s since changed. Of course, you’ve now got marketing global marketing, every country, it goes through it. Every every country has their own businesses as well that are big businesses in local markets but probably not known as international companies. So everybody has seen the power of marketing the, what I can deliver and they latched onto it and they kept growing. So you could see the growth from ExactTarget coming first over to London. When I started. The London office had just pretty much opened. So you could see how it was just spreading across the globe at the time and it’s even gone further now.
Anthony Lamot: For sure. And so across your vast experience, what would you say was your most interesting project or one of your most interesting projects?
William McMahon: God, it’s a difficult question that because I suppose there’s so many. I’ve been involved with quite a considerable number of projects and they all vary. So if I narrow it down a little bit into particularly Marketing Cloud tools, we’ve done one for has recruitment. We’ve been partnered with has recruitment for number of years now and like that went in to has recruitment as an individual contractor. And highlighted to them is that they didn’t need just me as a solution architect. They needed a whole professional to be able to implement the technology at scale. So we went in as Gravitai. Yeah, convinced them, you know, that it wasn’t just me. We went in and implemented. I think it was about 33 countries markets that were all operating out of Marketing Cloud, all multi lingual. We had a bespoke integration with their own CRM recruitment tool that was taking in all of that data, hundreds of hundreds and millions of records of job applicants, candidates, job advertisers, you name it. It was all in there and then started using Marketing Cloud to start personalizing the campaigns so that it was job recommendations based on your interests, your career path… quite a vast set scale implementation. Lots of other integrations with chat bots before AI GPT. They were doing these kinds of chat bot… emails that were able to respond out, to candidates… then did their sales cloud implementation off the back of that as well. So they expanded quite large their technology kit. So that was pretty, that was probably a really interesting one in terms of scale. But I think other clients we’ve done stuff with every single one of them have a unique… case of use case. We’ve been working with men united for the last number of years as well. They have some really cool marketing campaigns and again cut us to the marketing team there because they’re always looking at innovative ways of, you know, using marketing in sport or even just digital communications in sport. So they have things like match prediction emails or campaigns. They have podcast emails that go out.
Anthony Lamot: As table about the match prediction campaigns, what’s that about?
William McMahon: Yeah. So you can pretty much like a fantasy football league effectively, you can… it’s not betting but it is effectively trying to predict your score. So you have a lead table on your predictions on any upcoming games, and then it emails you out weekly of your results, where you are on the leader table, how you, how you’re progressing through the league. So it’s really cool stuff. And again using all out of box kind of Marketing Cloud capability.
Anthony Lamot: So that all based on match outcomes are actually stored inside Marketing Cloud. And then I guess using some SQL or server side JavaScript you’re trying to, you know… Yeah, that sounds familiar to me. And talking about, hey, you were talking mostly about Marketing to actual candidates. Were any campaigns set up there for, you know, Marketing to has customers themselves like more B to B campaigns because, I would sort of suspect that that’s part of the complexity of doing implementation for a company in the recruitment industry.
William McMahon: Absolutely like you’ve got so many different profiles, to target with. So candidates is the obvious one, you know, who’s applying for jobs. But obviously, you would also have B to B Marketing. So you’re always looking for the companies who are going to be advertising a job or who have a recruitment need. So you also have strategic accounts on that because you’ll have let’s say international companies that would be having a role, it could be set in Boston, but they could be happy for somebody to work in London. So you’ve got huge complexity with it. Even on the candidate stage. I think the candidate stages inside is a lot more complex because which blends in with the B to B side or the organization side because you don’t want to retarget a candidate who is just taking a job for one of your clients, you know, so you have to learn how to both promote job opportunities, but also make sure candidates aren’t just being continuously targeted and poached for, the next Cherry that’s dangled in front of them.
Anthony Lamot: Right. Got it. And you mentioned scale in what sense? It’s scaling, send volume, just sheer database, the amount of SQL that’s running and it may be impacting performance or when you say scale, what are you referring to?
William McMahon: The just the enormity of Gravitai scale of the enormity of data that is involved like that in jobs, job, advertisements and candidates. It’s a pretty big, you can say data architecture that drives it all behind it. Automation wise. Yeah, a lot of it is run through run through automation studio and SQL filter down in, excuse me into segmented audiences for then to use inside Journey Builder. And then within Journey Builder, you’ve got further complexities and integrations with third party apps as well. API triggers that go out from Journey Builder to gain update website personalization notifications as well.
Anthony Lamot: Very cool. The last client I ever worked for as a contractor, you know, doing a Marketing Cloud implementation. They had, it sounded a bit similar in terms of market size. At least they had 30 markets and they had two brands and then they used, you know, they had both separate business units. So for those who don’t know who are listening in business unit, Marketing Cloud, essentially a separate environment here, you can have your own data and permissions and what not. So. And they had a separate business unit or BU per transactional and commercial sense. So you had 30 markets times two brands, times two types of sending. So we end up and plus a few extra for staging and testing. So we had about like 160 business units that we had to deal with. So it was kinda cool that’s something I like, I love to geek go.
William McMahon: Who’s got the most amount of units?
Anthony Lamot: Well, you know, it was definitely not us. I have spoken with one media company, one that connections and it’s an American media company that just has many brands and they have, I believe over 900 business units that’s the record I’ve heard of.
William McMahon: It, it has always been the first question or the first architectural decision you make when you do Marketing Cloud is how you structure your business units. And again, it can go down through different brands. It can go down to country levels. It really falls down to who you want to have access to, what data can the data be shared? And if you are sharing within the same business unit, you then pulls the risk that Germany sends accidentally to your Spanish segment. So segregation into different business units comes in a lot handier. But it also comes at a lot more cost because it’s not only additional license on a business unit, it’s also additional implementation on the business unit.
Anthony Lamot: Yeah. And one of the big limitations there for me still is that in Contact Builder, you can’t limit the access to data. But contact builder is a much more feature-rich way to manipulate your data even on a one-by-one record basis. So, yeah, this is a funny one for me.
William McMahon: You can see the evolution of the system like certainly from the ExactTarget days. I remember before Journey Builder was even released. We had, the problem statement from clients of how do I do you know, kind of a multi-stage campaign based on whether somebody’s opened previous e-mail and, it was a real headache because you’d have to do a lot of automations and a lot of SQL queries to make decisions on the data that has happened. And I remember when they announced Journey Builder on its first release and iteration and it was okay but filled with kind of bugs and as you get in the base or release, but you could see it how now it’s the whole platform has evolved over the years to where it’s become now and it’s still not perfect. There’s still a lot that you wish the platform could do better but, you know, you can see that it is still being invested into it’s. Still got its roadmap. You just wanted to get there a little bit quicker.
Anthony Lamot: For sure. Actually it’s funny that you mentioned that because just very recently I started a little bit of a discussion on LinkedIn mentioning that the Marketing Cloud roadmap is somewhat limited as they announced it at Dreamforce, although I do think there are very exciting features that were shared regarding mostly generative, generated images although from what I gather you still need a type form integration I believe for those.
William McMahon: Yeah, it’s definitely where it’s going as an industry is a I, it’s going to be everywhere. So if you’re not using it, your business is going to struggle. So it’s jumping onto it now and using it responsively and wisely, but there’s a lot of use cases for it certainly in customer services and Marketing customer services like that. Help and support can be all driven through AI at the moment or it even has been, it’s all as kind of labeled. They, they just keep putting another label on it. And it’s now gone from Einstein to instead AI, but it’s evolved Marketing.
Anthony Lamot: It’s actually even Einstein one data Cloud that’s, the new label, they, you know, pull on top of it. I think it’s so funny because they’ve done this before with people might remember Salesforce1: Hyper Force. And, and now they also have Marketing GPT that’s also another brand they kinda released genie. Apparently genie got pulled, this might be hearsay in a rumor. So please don’t quote me on this. But apparently genie got pulled because they got into a lawsuit in Japan over IP and that’s why they’re not using that brand anymore.
William McMahon: I heard very similar rumors.
William McMahon: You know, it’s the one thing and you’ve even heard it already on this podcast so far is we keep referring it to his ExactTarget because it’s the traditional and even Pardot you’ll still refer to it as Pardot because that’s what it was or what it’s become. So when the names keep changing, it’s so frustrating. Like Interaction Studio is one that it’s changed its name so often and it gets very confusing for clients as well because you then don’t know what you actually need to buy.
Anthony Lamot: sure, I mean there, there, there’s an obvious product Marketing benefit to constantly changing a name because it feels like you’re constantly pushing something entirely new. So that can probably help capture exact mind share at a large conference, but it, it’s such a hassle for the system integrators to have to explain to your customers. Notice is just the same thing as before.
William McMahon: Exactly. The, the beauty thing of Marketing Cloud as well. You can do a lot with just Marketing Cloud, you know, with it has its engine. So a scripting. I remember when I first started Gravitai, I was one of our first customers. It was Just Eat and they wanted to do a restaurant recommendation. So every time you eat from one restaurant who would recommend to you either the next week, the same restaurant or it might give you a variety of restaurants. And we went solutioning it with Salesforce at the time and that they were looking forget what tool it was. But it was again a recent acquisition that they had for personalization of content. So it was one of their, I think it was an ExactTarget acquisition actually not a Salesforce acquisition but I go digital that’s what it was. I go digital is a forget what they renamed it to. But we went solutioning it with that. And what I couldn’t do at the time was Geo radius targeting, of a pulse code and we were stomped and we couldn’t use any of the technologies that it was there. So we ended up building it all in a script and we had this huge recommendations engine that could recommend to you another restaurant in your area based on your pulse code, based on the cuisine, dishes and interests and types that you had. And there are lots of other different factors.
It was a lot of AMPscript but it was just able to use, the, you could say the under hood power of what was in it was in the system, but that’s what I really liked about Marketing Cloud is that, you know, you would find use cases or clients asking for something that would really push the system that little bit further. So, I’ve never done it before but we will figure out a way to do it because it’s got all of the underlying functions that you would otherwise need.
Anthony Lamot: Absolutely. Now, William, one, one thing that’s interesting about your pad to is that Gravitai also provides do consulting and that you are in fact “technology agnostic”. Can you tell us a bit about that? Because that’s quite interesting. It’s quite unique too in your offering, I believe.
William McMahon: Thank you. Yes, it’s we certainly do. We are like I said vendor agnostic. And that has just allowed us to be able to help clients assess their technology stack but also compare what are the technologies there and what’s more suited for them. And a few years ago, like a small business start up as we were, we could never afford the Salesforce, roles, rice technology stack for our business. We were helping our clients implement it. But as a small business, we just couldn’t afford the full stack in capability. So we had kind of settled for as a new business, would, you know, excel documents for invoices and then zero and then suite CRM, so whole myriad of tools and it became such a headache for me as a CEO then that I had no in house capabilities. We were always servicing, our clients on their technologies and we had neglected our own. So I went off looking for the holy grail and all in one system that I could just put everything into and found do just by complete chance and looked at do could do a CMS website. I do CRM Marketing automation, event management, accounting, the whole shebang. And I was like this is pretty cool and took a bit of a leap of faith with us. Implemented it for ourselves, migrated our words, WordPress, words, website over to us and then CRM and eventually migrated our entire operation just running off od and being techs, we self implemented it. It’s like, well, if you’re going to you’re going to want to learn it, you might as well do it for yourself. And just saw that how beneficial it has been to us. It saved me about 40 hours a month of my own time managing a business and just thought, okay, well, other clients could benefit.
So we became an ad partner about two years ago. We’re now the fastest growing a partner in the UK and Ireland. Where, yeah, it’s I love it. It’s it’s, I have a newsletter called Drinking the Purple Juice. This is what I say to people is if you, once you drink the juice, you see the power of these capabilities. Phenomenal. So doing some talks in Sheffield tomorrow in London on Thursday, going to Galway in a couple of weeks. And then we have the Dreamforce equivalent of do it’s called the do experience. Have that in November. So we’ve kind of really landed in the community. It’s it’s an open source platform.
So you have a much wider community of developers globally who have used do since it’s been around for about 20. Years, I think so. It’s got a good community. It’s still growing but it’s nowhere near the scale of. Salesforce. Clients are certainly the kind of enterprise level clients. Do, clients are usually around, the small medium business startups?
Anthony Lamot: Gotcha. And so, in what case would you recommend a customer to during the purple juice or I suppose the orange juice? So that is to say, when would you recommend ad or Marketing Cloud? And you cannot start your answer with it depends.
William McMahon: It’s a great question. Basically, if you look at each of the Salesforce clouds of commerce, cloud, Marketing Cloud service cloud, you know, every Salesforce cloud do is one application that gives you all of that and more, it has its own accounting application that’s the equivalent of zero. So it does depend on what you’re trying to solve. If you’re coming at it for a single use case where you’re happy with the rest of your technology stack and you’re not intending on replacing anything, then an individual stack like Salesforce Marketing Cloud is ideal if you’re considering certainly a wider use case with do like in manufacturing, it’s got its own ERP or it is an ERP system. So it manages the whole manufacturing process, of your business. So it’s got a lot wider use cases and it’s certainly a cost effective solution. You know, it’s still there’s still a license price to it. So, but it depends, it really depends that’s why you come to Gravitai.
What we end up doing is like that is coming into the business, understanding, what are you trying to solve, what do you have already? And a lot of the time through our assessments, you will find out actually you’re paying for this capability and feature in a platform you already have? Why don’t you utilize that? And if it’s a case then of their desire not to utilize it for cost or whether it’s, a just too unusable too technical, then we’re able to compare what are the other tool kits out on market and make the best recommendation really for them. Because for us, od was the right choice for us. We, we’ve heavily invested into it. We’ve got our entire operations running from one application and that’s really what I wanted. I couldn’t keep maintaining. I think it’s about 15 different applications is what I had running Gravitai at the time. So I just consolidated it all into one built a team that then understood that one application do that could then maintain it and expand it that way.
Anthony Lamot: Interesting. And what I really liked about your answer is that you actually start with a use case based answer. Not so much. You know, if you’re a larger company, you go for Marketing Cloud. If you’re a smaller company, you automatically go for do because that’s a bit. How for instance, in the past part and Marketing Cloud were position almost for B to B or almost for B to C. And to a large extent, that was maybe true. But I know B to B companies who definitely need Marketing Cloud and vice versa.
William McMahon: Yeah. I’ve seen, the very same is that sometimes they’ve been sold the wrong product and you have to kinda go in and reset the whole thing, reset the relationship and you try to make best use out of what you have. But then when they start hitting that ceiling, it is a bit of a sit down and have that conversation with, you know, the better application is an alternative application and just to guide them really, you know, being agnostic, you have to be a trusted advisor. You really have to kinda be on the client side, not on a sales side. You don’t want to be selling something for a commission. You really want to kinda show them that the best application is, you know, suited for them because they, it’s going to, they’re going to have to use it for the next five to 10 to 15 years. You don’t want them to be stripping it out every three years. Yeah.
Anthony Lamot: Absolutely. One of my first Marketing Cloud projects was also by far my most painful one one because… the customer had essentially bought predictive intelligence, which is a module. I don’t even know if it, if it’s still actively being positioned, but I think it’s renamed some.
I mean, I still around it’s, definitely been renamed, but I haven’t even come across it in any other shape or form because essentially what it was it was predictive, a, I generated personalization for your website based on a product catalog that you had to upload in Marketing Cloud one and you required professional services to actually get it running. And so here’s where it went wrong, the customer expected rule based personalization instead of predictive, they actually sort of imagined or expected some kind of full website personalization module, which it really isn’t and then the second thing is that nobody knew, not even on the person who sold it, they realized that professional services were required. And so they actually Salesforce actually had to go out and hire someone to support us who was new to the product himself. So that was a very difficult one in terms of managing expectation that it’s known in consultancy.
William McMahon: Predictive intelligence was that tool people said would not go digital. The very same thing was said, if you ever remember, about Audience Builder.
Anthony Lamot: For sure, you know, we mean Audience Builder is sunsetting. It’s still around there’s a few 100 companies, maybe a bit less that still have it. It’s one, it’s one of our it’s a very common use case for us, to replace Audience Builder these days.
William McMahon: Yeah.
Anthony Lamot: Yeah, we’ve actually recently done one of, the larger Audience Builder implementation that we replaced. It was a customer that had… only their customer data was, I mean their customer records were 170,000,000 records and the one data extension with. I mean, they still have it. I’m not saying this is a good practice by the way, but they store six years worth of transactional data in it and it has one point 2,000,000,000 records. But, but we manage, to query the thing with a little bit of a bit of custom setup for them. But, we actually manage to use DESelect, to help in segment. And so they’re no longer depending on Audience Builder, which was a good tool once you got it up and running, but it’s very expensive to get it up and running and maintain because you rely on Salesforce professional services.
William McMahon: Exactly that. And I think the, you know, the excitement that marketers get when they get new tools and certainly with data is let’s put all our data into this, you know, let’s like you said, it’s the resetting of expectation of kinda go okay, tell us what you have, tell us what you want to use it for, and we’ll guide you in how to do it. And a lot of that time is just bringing over the right amount of data that you need because that will save you a lot of other technical complexities in the long run and probably get you out of a lot of hot water when you get an order as to why you have all of this data in another system?
Anthony Lamot: Yeah, absolutely. William. We’ve been talking a bit about being technology agnostic. One of the cool things of Salesforce is obviously the AppExchange is basically the B2B app store. What’s your point of view on that? And, and especially what’s interesting as you come from the ExactTarget era. I even forgot what the original ExactTarget “AppExchange” was called Hub Exchange, yes, that was it.
William McMahon: I think it’s a very useful marketplace, for integrations and third party apps. It certainly has grown over the years. It’s useful for when you let’s say, have, a third party that builds a good application integration. I think for the sales cloud service or core, we’ll say there’s a lot more apps, useful apps there for it. But for Marketing Cloud, there’s a select few and, you know, DESelect is one of, the good ones that are there that really benefit really Bill and fit the users in the marketers. I think trying to keep Marketing Cloud open or even the Salesforce tool kits open so that people can build and adapt onto the platform is a hugely beneficial thing whether it’s a premium app or whether it’s a full licensed app. You do find, you know, useful use cases for it. Like I said, I remember the days years ago when even DESelect wasn’t around and you, I often thought like, why haven’t Salesforce or even ExactTarget at the time? Why haven’t, they solved this problem of just being able to just easily segment. Because as a marketer who doesn’t know SQL and I’m going in trying to teach them all these wonderful, you know, predictive personalization campaigns and you’re trying to teach them amscript and you’re trying to teach them SQL and they’re looking at you just going. But I’m a marketer, I look at the strategic. So having the tools on like DESelect, you know, it’s able to fill the gap, solve the problem that the vendor hasn’t solved themselves. And, you know, I think, you know, maybe one day Salesforce do acquire DESelect and bring it all into platform. That would be one.
Anthony Lamot: Well, I think my might because I get this question a lot obviously. But I think become a generalist and you’re trying to cover many use cases across a variety of capabilities and even different products and platforms in themselves. And so, and a lot of your focus is also on security trust scalability enterprise. So necessarily you cannot be best in class for every single thing. So for those companies who do seek the best segmentation solution, the best way to do frequency capping, you name it. That’s why, they reach out to us because Salesforce will get you far but for many, not far enough. And, and that’s okay because it is providing you infrastructure scalability send volumes that no other platform can those kinds of things. So especially for enterprise, I think it’s I mean a wonderful platform and more for mid market definitely as well and more even for smaller companies. So I think that’s interesting. I love how you mentioned premium along the way there. We are actually experimenting with that ourselves. So we’re very well known for our free app, the search app that anyone can get. But now, yeah the now, for DESelect segments. So which was just originally known as DESelect. Now that’s split up into, you know, just one of the modules we have, we actually have it for free on the AppExchange although of course, you know, it’s premium. So it’s you know, limited usage. And then, if you really like it, you can still consider purchase. I think purchasing it. Maybe as we start slowly winding up this conversation, I do wanna dig into something that you mentioned along the road and we can’t escape it these days. It’s a I, I’d love to hear. We can talk about a I in Marketing Cloud. But I’m also just very curious personally how have you? I’m just assuming you found some use cases for generative ai GPTor maybe any other app. So I’d love to hear that.
William McMahon: It’s a hot topic. It’s as soon as I saw it come out last November, I got straight onto it and started looking at use cases and it has immediately solved so much for me. So, a lot of our time that we spend with lions is around writing a statement of work. You know, before we even… start a project, we put into a really detailed statement of work. And these statements of work or even a response to an RFP could take like a response to one RFP. Before would take me about seven days if not two weeks to respond. We can now get it down to about eight hours, 10 hours work through GPT. So it has a huge use case for us. It doesn’t necessarily replace anyone because you still have to be able to compose… your scripts. You need to be able to validate what it’s asking the same with development. I’ve seen the very same situations where as a developer myself in the background, you’d be spending hours programming and going to Google looking up, you know, solutions and code and workarounds. Again eliminated so much of that. So it doesn’t necessarily eliminate you as a developer. It just changes. It’s another tool kit that you’ve been given. That just really benefits and it makes it a lot more efficient. Only last week, I’ve been training my voice on AI. So we’re what we’re looking at as well as AI videos. So demonstration videos, training videos, that kind of stuff. And like that we’ve been looking at, you know, the voice of, the videos and, the bottleneck if it was let’s say one person, you’ve always got one bottle neck or do you do multiple people? So we’ve been exploring AI, for that use case. I’ve been looking at AI in Marketing. I think you touched on it earlier as well about images and content and personalization, in your emails. So it’s going to be a lot more personalized to you than ever before. Certainly when you talk video. So a I video generation is absolutely crazy. Scary at the moment is that you would be hard pushed to know whether you’re speaking to an AI or whether you’re actually speaking to a real person?
Anthony Lamot: Or even that a 16 year old kid could actually produce a movie, the movie really cool.
William McMahon: Yeah. It, it’s got its use case like, it has to be treated with a lot of care, a lot of respect, but like with everything, it has a lot more benefits that, you know, if you know how to leverage it and you’re leveraging it for good, you can do a lot of great things with it. And, I don’t think it should be feared. It should be respected for sure and just putting it too good because it was a bit like a Marketing Automation back in the day when we got Journey Builder and… you basically can automate it. You can, you can reduce down the amount of time it has taken for somebody, to do a job and they can spend that time then analyzing reflecting, adapting, putting more strategic thinking into it rather than actually having to build it. And it’s definitely, the future. I absolutely love it. I’m pretty much signed up to it at the moment.
Anthony Lamot: And I, my best use case for ChatGPT just does remain synthesis. So summarizing for instance transcriptions. So for instance, if this interview, I would like to get the takeaways, I could probably just get the transcription out of Zoom in this case and dump it into ChatGPT. One thing that I have struggled with though is to use it for creative writing. So I’m gonna confess I’ve actually used ChatGPT for my last article on my Founders’ Trail blog on LinkedIn about the founder journey, but I’ve also used it at some point for a few LinkedIn posts and it’s interesting because what, I mean, it was a fun experiment. What I did was I copy-pasted like my last 30 LinkedIn posts that had good engagement, dumped them into ChatGPT instructed ChatGPT to reproduce my writing style my, you know, my voice and my tone. Yeah, and my tone and then basically generate new posts for me. And then, you know, I did go in and tweak them a little bit to make them, you know, more personalized or, you know, more reflective of my current thoughts. But it was interesting to see how ChatGPT could take, you know, my past content and then kind of spin it into new content that was still relevant and engaging for my audience. So that was a really interesting experiment for sure.
And, and it summarized it well. But then I tried to, I ask you to write post and they’re okay. For instance, I can just copy-paste success story from our website and dump it into GPT and say, rewrite this in my style for a LinkedIn post and it does it, but it’s always a little bit below a standard. And then I kinda notice this is the most interesting bit. The more I repeat it, it’s like it deteriorates again.
William McMahon: Yeah.
Anthony Lamot: Even though I’m in the same session. So it should really be remember. And even if I ask it, what was my style again?
William McMahon: It caps.
Anthony Lamot: It, well, yeah, but there’s something missing there in the creative riding aspect.
William McMahon: There, there is in ChatGPTunder the new release settings that you can give it certain profile information that it will remember about you. So you can tell it about, your style. But it is, it’s an art form. It’s almost another job to become a script writer for ChatGPT because…
Anthony Lamot: Prompt engineer.
William McMahon: That yeah, because, it is exactly like that you can ask it or you feeding information to get back and when you read the responses, it can be well written but you do have to re, prompt it or you have to kinda shape it into how you want it. Like that. I’ve had hidden miss, you know, at the beginning, when you’re trying it out, you’re getting various results and responses back. But as you get better with your prompts and, you know, how to craft them, you do get a lot of good replies back from it. But even if it’s just for chatting companies, sometimes you ask it some test questions, see what he would come back with. There was one use case I tried last year or so. It didn’t work out but do has certifications like Salesforce certifications, but not as strictly monitored. So as you’re taking your multiple choice question, I thought let’s see how well the ChatGPT answers these and ChatGPT fails like that. Every every answer I gave to the multiple-choice, I would say this is the answer. This is the reason why you’d read it and you got it’s. A fair. It’s a fair believable reply. You know, you wouldn’t question it but, you know, the, I just didn’t pass the audio certification for me.
Anthony Lamot: It’s funny that’s hilarious. Yeah. One other cool trick before we move on that I heard is whenever you make a prompt, the last bit of your prompt should be. And actually I should do this more often myself is okay. After your answer also tell me, how, could I have written a better prompt? So the machine instruct you too, and I think that’s also really?
William McMahon: I’m just asking it to confirm any. It, does it have any questions? I’ve not had a few times? And so if you ask, you have to tell it what you want, but then tell it to ask you any questions and it will come back. And then you can evolve that. It does really help it.
Anthony Lamot: Absolutely. William, before we round up, do you have any parting advice for those who are new to the Marketing Cloud space?
William McMahon: It’s a great space to be in maybe bad economic climate to be in, but it is one that it’s a fun career. You certainly want to have both a creative streak and a bit of, a geeky technology streak to succeed in it. Keep looking at technology, keep looking like on chatGPT and AI, you know, what are, the new tools that are out there? Don’t be afraid to learn, just really roll up your sleeves, start thinking of new concepts and ideas and trying to, wanting to solve how to solve them in Marketing Cloud or whatever the technology tool kid is. That is the only way you will learn. And once you’ve got that appetite, like I said, it’s like drinking the purple juice. Once you’ve got the appetite, you can see, it becomes a fun job. You know, you actually enjoy analyzing data, seeing what works, what behaviors results in certain up, takes it. It is, really fun stuff.
Anthony Lamot: It’s great advice. Well, thank you William for taking the time to be in the show. Has been a pleasure speaking with you.
William McMahon: Absolutely. And thanks for your time as well and arranging this.
Discover how our platform instantly optimizes your Marketing Cloud
Anthony Lamot: Hi, and welcome to Heroes of Marketing Cloud. The show where we talk with Salesforce Marketing Cloud experts. My name is Anthony Lamot. I’m the CEO and co-founder of DESelect. And I’ll be your host for today. And today, we’ll be talking with Arthur Backouche. Archer is a senior Salesforce Marketing Cloud consultant at Skie and we have a very engaging conversation about AI and all things technical in Marketing Cloud: SQL, AMPScript and also SSGS as well as other trends going on in the marketing automation space. So, welcome to the show. Hi, Arthur, welcome to the show.
Arthur Backouche: Hi, Anthony. How are you?
AL: I’m doing very well, opposite sides of the world that I appreciate you making time on an early Saturday morning for you.
AB: Yeah, it’s great to meet you. Actually, your name seems to be French. I was wondering, are you from France and a lot of people from your team are in Switzerland?
AL: Yeah, no, that’s a great question. So, I’m a, I’m not French although I speak some French or at least I like to think that I speak some French but I’m Belgian.
AB: That’s nice, it must be great to live in Texas.
AL: Right. And I know you’re based in Sydney, but you don’t particularly have an Australian accent.
AB: Yeah. I arrived in Sydney like five years ago now. Yeah, it’s really good. I think so far it’s like one of the best city I’ve lived in like you have like the outdoor activity and the lifestyle is really great, but I guess Texas must be nice as well. This is where there is a Tesla headquarters as well.
AL: Yeah, that’s right. Elon lives about 30 minutes from where I’m currently sitting.
AB: Really? Do, do you grab your coffee in the same cafe sometimes?
AL: Well, or we’re not grabbing drinks, we’re not on the first meeting basis just yet, but who knows, he likes to hang out with podcasters.
AB: That’s that’s fine. Yeah, but yeah, no, winter is amazing here. I mean, Australia gets hot too, but right now, it’s been over 40 degrees Celsius over 100 Fahrenheit for like two months, but I love it. I’m glad to, you know, be in this hot climate. How did you come up to choose Texas?
AL: That’s that’s a long story… and I want to go into too much detail now because maybe, you know, some people hear more about Marketing Cloud. But the majority of our market is in the U.S.. We serve large enterprise companies, and mid-market, there’s a huge market for us in Europe. There’s also a huge market for us in Australia and APAC, the majority of big companies obviously are in the us. So we want to open office here and Austin is a very vibrant city with a lot of new tech talent. It’s centrally located and it has a, yeah, you know, it’s just a great city. So that’s why we chose Austin, Texas specifically.
AB: Okay. That’s nice. And, and you started your journey with Marketing Cloud. I hear that you went on holiday for a few weeks to learn how to code in order to build DESelect. Yeah. I mean, like maybe you read that, in a blog or something. That’s really a great story.
AL: I appreciate that. Yeah, kind of. So at some point I wanted to get better programming. So I took a sabbatical went to Bali lifter for three months while I rented my home back in Belgium out on Airbnb just to cover for costs and… I won’t say that lead directly, to say, but at least I had to technological know-how, to see a solution to think of a solution. So I don’t regret it. Yeah.
AB: Yeah. And were you a user of Marketing Cloud before?
AL: Yeah, I was already doing Marketing Cloud projects for. Yeah. And what about your background Arthur? Yeah. What is it like? You can see a bit about what your background is? And, and what is that you do these days?
AB: Yeah. So I used to, I used to study computer science. So I did a school called Epitech and the it’s like school where you only learn by practice. You know, there is no theory.
So like you have it’s like it’s exactly like working in like an agency. So you have always project to deliver with group of people, and you have no theory knowledge. So you no the record knowledge. So it’s like you deliver project. So it was great to learn that. But I didn’t really like language like, deep technology language. I was more interested in digital marketing or to drive customer to drive conversion to a website to optimize a website. So I started to do a lot of like in township like and work in digital marketing at first… and that, so I’ve learned like the digital marketing in general. And I worked like maybe five, six years as a digital marketer. And then when I came back to Australia, I realized that like working as a digital market, digital marketing is not great. But I don’t have like a good visa. For example, you don’t have like good salary as well. Like because there is no benchmark or digital marketer, you don’t know if like the, this guy is better than that guy. Like there is no one, to say like where with Salesforce certification, like you have an industry and you have like a benchmark between like the different consultants I guess. And then yeah, I started learning like about it about Salesforce more specifically because I already had like this it background. And yes. So I’ve learned about Salesforce. And then I started working as a consultant and it grew because Marketing Cloud specifically requires you to know about like it like you need to code in like SQL, JavaScript, and Script language. And also you need to have the knowledge into digital marketing such as like having conversations that make sense with the customer for example on what they can achieve, what are like the nurturing journey with at the segment. And I think it was the best of both worlds for me because like I had like there’s two… segments there’s two addons that I’ve learned over my life. And then I end up working as a self, as a Marketing Cloud consultant.
AL: It sounds like a good, yeah, it sounds like a good marriage between your it background and your marketing agency background. I think just as an aside, I think it’s interesting what you said about how salaries for marketing clock consultants are better in, for agencies. I think scarcity in the job market is perhaps a part of it, but you’re probably right that certification helps because with an agency, it’s very hard to have objective measures, of the work, I suppose.
AB: Yeah. And, and I think from what I saw is like if you work as a generic digital marketer, like there is plenty of digital marketer in the world, I guess. And, and it’s more like the like if you work in marketing, you are the one searching for a job where if you are a consultant in Marketing Cloud, the company are searching for you as a skip. So there is like it’s totally different like, the balance between the supplier and the yeah.
AL: Exactly. So what’s the coolest marketing clap project you’ve done so far Arthur?
AB: I’ve worked on like plenty of interesting projects. I think like project that I like is where there is technical challenge with the platform. I think one that was quite interesting that we just delivered is an integration with hardware, for the BBC. So they created like a photo booth system. So, you know, like where people take photos and, we integrate it with Marketing Cloud. So for that, we are using like we are using different API, for example, content builder API to re, like, the files and the files were like MP four and like give you so, you know, it’s like more it’s quite interesting to learn how to encode like a video, for example, and pass it to content builder. And then we were sending like a journey, we were triggering a journey that sent an e-mail that includes this content to the user. So, so, so this one was maybe not the most complex one but as there is an integration to aware and to a product that is that you can touch or that you can interact with in the real life, I think it was pretty cool. I think.
AL: Yeah, no, for sure. I mean, I’ve had a number of great guests on the show and I think you’re the first person ever gave an example, of someone integrating between hardware and Marketing Cloud. Could you, maybe we have a mixed audience of technical and nontechnical users? So with that in mind, could you highlight some of, the challenges you ran into or how you went about that solution? Because I think it’s kind of interesting.
AB: Yes. So, so I think like… so there is a different type of challenge. There is a technical challenge and there is a process like, we had challenge with the process and I think something that we really improve is like the QA testing. So, so, so we work with someone of our team that runs the test properly, like, to see if there is any bug in the solution. And I think this, we add some challenges at the beginning where, we were delivering like the first… had some issue and someone of our team called Christian run like the QA test and find out there is some issue for example, with… you know, like when you deliver like promo code because when, we are sending the e-mail to people, we were giving some promo code like discount code, 20 percent of 100 percent of. And what we realize is that there is an issue when Johnny is delivering, the discount code. Sometimes I will deliver the same code, to different people even though like you have like a system that should make them deliver only one code per person.
AL: All right. So it sounds like it was like randomly generated but maybe not unique. Is that what you’re saying?
AB: No, they were stored into data extension, but still like I think like when the journey delivers the e-mail, it goes too fast, and sometimes like the journey doesn’t have the capability to say, okay, this concord has been already delivered now. I’m going to the next one now, I’m going to the next one. So we had to use a function for that. I don’t remember the name of the function, but one part of the function was raised, and it basically… stop not the system but switch to another contact in the system. If there is a, if this happened. So, so, so we find out the solution. Yeah.
AL: Yeah. So I just wanted to actually know a little bit about the race error thing and I know it’s going pretty technical here for the audience, but there’s a function call race error that if my understanding is correct, it can just cancel a specific e-mail being sent for whatever reason. It’s like a catch-all or if something goes wrong.
AB: Yeah. And you have two choices basically. So you have like either which I can sell the overall process. So no contact will receive any e-mail anymore or it’s just one contact that stopped receiving the e-mail and then they continue to switch to the other one in the process, right? Yeah. So this was one of the challenges that we discovered, we fixed it. So it was good… and we also improve a lot the way we work as a team with like the process like the testing part is very important, and I think it’s something that you learn and that is different with each team. So, so, so, you know, it’s not like if you are like a JavaScript developer and, you have like a proper framework that exists, I feel it’s up to each organization to build their own testing framework with Marketing Cloud. And, and I think we have learned a lot to build out in order to deliver products that are perfect for the customer.
AL: Cool. Yeah. I know as many people have actually commented on the show that quality assurance, and not having an actual sandbox is a typical challenge. So it sounds like an interesting way, to deal with that. Another functionality that’s been more discussed recently and obviously we run into as we have launched a new product call Engage is frequency capping. It was kinda curious if you’ve ever worked with Einstein frequency capping, if you’ve seen use cases, and how it turns out.
AB: Yes. So, I think frequency is very interesting in terms of what we call audience fatigue. So, it’s like you make sure you don’t deliver too much content to your contact in order to keep him like interested in your product, like you don’t struggle with like all your e-mail… if we use it. Yes, I think we use it, but differently, like for example, at this stage, we set up some fields… in Sales Cloud for example. And when we pull like the Salesforce data, we will do a filter on this particular filled in Sales Cloud just to make sure that we are not sending like… before 30 days, for example, like, the e-mail so, we haven’t used in a lot of projects like Einstein frequency cap. But I think I have a good understanding of what it is, and how we can… use it. You, from your point of view, why people are using Engage like your new product?
AL: Yeah, a great question. Thank you. Well, first off, there’s limitations with Einstein frequency capping. It’s a cool feature because it’s out of the box and you don’t need to do a lot to set up, but you need to be us, you need, to use the out of the box subscription model. And very few customers really use that because almost everyone ends up building a custom subscription center or something like that. And, and once you do that, you already can’t use it anymore. But I would say even, if you have that, there’s another issue with it, which is just a comfort that marketers have because it’s a black box. They don’t know, if Einstein says, you know, this person is saturated or not are not gonna send an e-mail or not. It doesn’t say why that is. So… as we spoke with our customers, and more than the context of DESelect Segment, it was require need a requirement for frequency capping, that is rule based, meaning marketers can define the rule. So I would say, for Engage to actually answer your questions. I think the main reasons why people get engaged are they need rule-based frequency campaign. They, they’re not only concerned about over-engagement but also under-engagement. So they also want to see, hey, who is my audience? Can I engage more with? And then, and this is also interesting. Actually, I didn’t think the product would turn out to be that way initially, but we ended up building this whole calendar where people can manage all their sense, all their campaigns if you prefer. Yeah. And then they can also manage priorities of campaigns in case our conflicts, like, if we can predict an audience is going to be over-saturated or, you know, they will hit their frequency cap.
AB: Yes. The way you describe Engage like your new product makes me think about the Einstein recipe in Interaction Studio. Have you heard about that? It’s like basically, it’s like, yeah, it’s like from what I understand is like Engage, you can have different ingredients like you can have different settings in order to build your own… what you define as a good frequency in a way?
AL: Right. But, okay. So you’re referring to Marketing Cloud Interaction Studio formerly known as Evergage.
AB: Yeah. And now it’s Personalization.
AL: Now, it’s Personalization, right? Yes. Thank you for reminding me. Oops, it’s different though, but here’s a problem with the constant renaming of the products. If, if we can be very candid and I feel on this show we can… the phrase “Marketing Cloud personalization” is a little bit misleading because you really have to ask what kind of personalization and ultimately Marketing Cloud personalization is really a digital solution, meaning it’s meant to personalize websites. Yes, there is a way to integrate with Marketing Cloud engagement. These a, so, the good all real Marketing Cloud. So I target and so, you could technically steer e-mail communications as well. But the driver of that is normally your digital interactions, the digital activities on your website, which there’s a whole subject in itself and effect is many people don’t have these two solutions. I mean, the companies or they’re not always completely integrated because they’re actually using different stacks. So… that’s not to say that there aren’t really interesting use cases in terms of driving e-mail personalization, by web interaction. I totally think there are it’s just that would not really be a solution for the problem we encounter with our customers who really just, yeah because they’re just our customers were just really worried about not being annoying and not spamming their customer.
AB: Yeah, yeah. I think it makes total sense. I think it’s a people need that and I think people want to see like a transparent solution where they understand each parameter of it like they want to know what will happen. And maybe that’s an issue that is happening with the current like feature of Marketing Cloud in frequency. And, and I think this can link us to the other question that is related to artificial intelligence, what’s the future of artificial intelligence with Marketing Cloud? And I think people really want control and transparency on what will happen. And I think this is a risk or like the part, but like it will be a challenge with generative artificial intelligence. I don’t think people want yet like a machine to write the e-mail copywriting that will be sent to the customer, they want to… they want to control that part mostly like the big organization because they are already like perfection is on the message that they deliver to their customer. And I think as well, what will be interesting with artificial intelligence? It will be on the insight and insights… and analytics. I think that’s the main area of development that I think will help. How, how about you, how do you see… artificial intelligence coming into Marketing Cloud?
AL: Yeah, great question. I mean, I, we’re gonna be able to talk a lot about this. I will take a step back first before even talking about Marketing Cloud specifically. We like we totally embraced it as a company. I personally use it. It’s like one of my new bookmarks. I have the paid version of GPT, and we actively encourage people in the company to use it for other lines of business. And we have a marketing team, right? So if I look at my own marketing team, we are already using it heavily for content creation. And if I work for instance, at a more strategic level, but whether it’s company’s strategy or… marketing strategy specifically, it’s a really interesting tool just for brainstorming. I find structure on your thoughts. I don’t know if you’ve tried that before.
AB: I do use it. I never use it to brainstorm… but yeah, I do use it like not every day, but, I think, yeah, like it saves me time, and I think he, you know, like I would be scared, if I was like a company such as Grammarly, you know, Grammarly, like the Chrome extension that fix your typo. I think like I tend to prefer using ChatGPT and like Grammarly for example.
AL: I don’t know. So this is, you say is because if I actually recently used ChatGPT, to help me write an article? Plus, I was plus I was doing, I was also doing an interesting experiment, on LinkedIn because I’m a very voracious poster on LinkedIn, people who follow the show, they probably know. And so I did a series of experiments where I had ChatGPT, right? LinkedIn posts. And the big thing I noticed is that one, that the posts are much more generic, but I can tell a little bit more about my strategy and I’ll make it less generic. But secondly, a Grammarly still finds grammatical suggestions in what ChatGPT says.
AB: Really? Yeah. And that’s why do you think?
AL: Because I don’t think GPT is optimized for having beautiful grammar, it’s optimized for giving synthesis, like for summarizing large quantities of natural language information and then providing suggestions while also tapping into the whole internet as a database essentially
AB: Yeah. That’s true. Yeah. And, and I think Grammarly will always provide different options maybe as like there is not one way of writing a sentence correctly, sure. So I don’t know. But yeah, I think it’s a great to like ChatGPT is nice. I think I’m quite excited about like I seen they started to develop some apps like you can integrate with external system. I think this would be like, I haven’t tried. I don’t know if it’s available on the market, but it’s basically, you can pull the data from other system. It’s it’s a bit like see it. Okay.
AL: I mean, we are doing this for our product… actually just this week. So today, I mean for those who are listening, it’s August 18, 2023. Just five days ago, we went live with DeeDeeAI.
And so, we called our generative AI capabilities DeeDeeAI a little bit similar to Einstein AI, I suppose. And what it does is that this is for our Segment product. So, for those who don’t know Segment is essentially a drag-and-drop solution to great SQL in Marketing Cloud to do very refined Segmentation duplication whatever. And so now people can just say, hey, did I want this segment from, you know, my last orders in Australia and France with volume of this and a value of this. And, and based on the natural language, we can translate that into a configured segment in DESelect which is not just SQL but actually for people who don’t know SQL, it’s actually a visual representation in our UC. And, and then people can still iterate and that’s just step one. We have a lot more ideas there to go further.
AB: You are using a ChatGPT API for that?
AL: Yeah, that’s right. So this is, we’re integrating with OpenAI for that. So, which is it’s a paid service, right? Because I have a solution for companies and we’re using some, we have integrate with some other APIs essentially. But then on our site, we need to add a layer to, you know, train the model, and help them understand, okay, this is how we, you know, this is what our data looks like and how we visualize it. And I mean, I need to add some guard rails, and stuff like that. So yeah, we do that.
AB: Is there like any plan to… get rid of OpenAI in the future to build your own fully full system?
AL: No, and yes. So, no, we don’t plan to get rid of OpenAI. And, and here’s a thing like, so as a side note, but an important one, I think… integrating generative AI capabilities into your product will typically rely on one of the big providers which for the time being will mainly be OpenAI, but we’re gonna see other providers as well. Obviously, the other tech companies are trying to catch up real fast and they will probably, I mean not catch up but they will deliver good solutions too. But what I’m trying to say is that this will become ubiquitous. And what I mean with that is like today, if you would start assessed company, gonna do it in a Cloud, right? Unless you maybe some very fringe niche financial on-premise product for security, which also happens but, you know, except for that, like very rare situation you would by default do in the Cloud. So, my prediction is that maybe a year from now every new SaaS company by default will have generative AI capabilities integrated into its solution because customers will expect it because they will expect that level of performance.
AB: Yeah. Maybe I saw a lot of… a lot of… yeah, most of the us now are using already like… some artificial intelligence integration I think is not all of them are really well integrated. I feel like sometimes to me, it doesn’t make sense that like it’s more here to, for the sake of being here. I think it’s really interesting to find what’s the usage that really provide value to the customer. And that’s a challenge because in some cases, in some cases like I think it’s still early to find like the real value of it. But, but yeah, like that would be interesting. Like, I think like people will enjoy like a lot of… people that are not technical or even people that are technical could enjoy using like a DeeDeeAI, I think.
AL: Well, I mean, if I can lift a little bit more of the… (spoiler alert), but so I mean we, we’re getting really positive feedback, on the initial feature. So the initial feature I described is essentially what we call copilot, right? You tell DeeDee like, hey, this is what I want to do and it’s segments for you, right? So that’s copilot. So that’s already live with a few customers, but we have already have a big waiting list and if people who are interested go over to DeeDeeAI and you can sign up for it. But, but we’re gonna go further and the next main capability that we’re already looking into. And then by the way, we also need to talk about just because we sidetracked on the ChatGPT. I just remember, we do talk about native ML as well. But, you know, just to stick with you, the other thing I wanna do is… what we call tribal knowledge. So, so Arthur, you know, you’ve been, you know, working with customers, you know, how in every organization, there’s just one guy or girl who knows the data, right? And whenever someone needs to create a segment or isn’t sure about a filter, they go to Frank or Suzie’s desk and they go, hey, Frank or Suzie, what filter should I use? What, what criteria should I use? And so, typically, this person, this kind of person is very proud of their work but it’s also not ideal for them that people come and pull their sleeve every five minutes, right? So, so there’s a bit of annoyance there from the point of view from the organization. However there’s like a massive risk if Frank or Suzie gets hit by a bus tomorrow, like who will know the data? So here’s, the idea for the tribal knowledge. The idea is that as people are segmenting, in DESelect with did or not like even manually, we quietly listen, and try to figure out or rather quietly tries to figure out how are people segmenting and why? So that when a new person joins that, they can just say, hey, did you know, I’m new in this company, tell me how people segment and it will just spit out all the typical segments. And then you can go build me one of these segments. Yeah. And I put, it will do that. But the, and then I think that here is a really important ones in a really interesting use case. You will be able to ask, can you tell me something about that filter? Why did you use this value in not the order? And that’s where it gets really interesting because now Frank and I, are certainly scaled, right?
AB: Yeah, I think that’s a good idea. I think we need that we also need like things to write documentation easily. Have you, have you heard about Scribe? So it’s…
AL: I think I heard of, I haven’t used to it.
AB: I haven’t used it neither, but it’s like something that basically as long as you create the process like let’s say you set up your segment in Marketing Cloud, Scribe will take some screenshots and they will build the documentation for you automatically, which is like very impressive. I think this is like the type of artificial intelligence usage that are very interesting compared to generating a small text on like another platform like for example, I saw Elementor they propose like something, do you know, element say propose of generative? Yeah, I mean you an, of, this platform… but like the way they integrated artificial intelligence is not that great like things. They just propose you to generate, the text, on the text widget. So, you know, like it depends, of the company. But yeah, it’s interesting.
AL: Yeah. In fact, I think we still use Elementor for our own website but, I might be wrong. It’s been a while since I had to go into the Admin Panel myself, but about Scribe, I mean, I just have a quick look at the website. Looks super interesting. I mean, look, I don’t know the product. I’m not endorsing this, is on affiliate marketing thing. I will say, I really believe in the value of good documentation. I think it’s one of those things. It’s interesting. Like one of the last… guests on the show was, Genna Matson from HowtoSFMC. And she also like underlying the value of good documentation. Now, obviously, we were talking specifically about Marketing Cloud. I think this is important for everything. In fact, just before I swear, just before this meeting, I spent the last two hours updating some of our own internal documentation which is like very specific business knowledge. I will make sure it’s like downloaded from my brain and available for the whole company. So, I mean, yeah, seeing something like this, is pretty cool. So thank you for the recommendation.
AB: And, there is two things. There is the documentation. And there, I don’t know how you call that in English but like in French, we call that, the “norme”. So it’s like structure of, yeah, it’s like the norm of your code. The way you write code is also very important, I think because…
AL: Or like a convention, maybe “coding convention”?
AB: Yeah, exactly. Code convention. I think this is so important because… like a code that is well written in Marketing Cloud, it’s so much easier to understand. So, I like this is something that we are working a lot in our team, to make sure that people write, the correct way. And also like there is some choice to be made to be made because for example, you can choose between AMPScript and SSGS… and some people will write like a full page in AMPScript when sometimes you should using be using more like SSGS for like a cloud page and AMPScript for small script only. So, so this is like an open discussion. What’s your view on that? Like what do you think? Do you have like a coding convention, for example, a DESelect and how do people make choice when they choose, the language to write?
AL: Cool, man. Let me interrupt that one. So, yes, the short answer is yes, of course, we have code conventions… before I jump in there. One thing that came to mind as you were as we were talking is, I know some people have used ChatGPT for reformatting of code. So reformatting it very quickly for those who don’t know like if you write code in a certain way in an overtime, keep adding and adding and adding. At some point, there’s sometimes ways to do it more efficiently if you can start from scratch, but that’s like typically the thing no developer wants to do because it’s more time consuming and you’re not really adding new functionality, just making code more efficient. But it’s super important because if you don’t you’re creating technical depth and sooner or later, it’s gonna hurt in a bad way. So I actually suggest a engineering done to try that. Now we tried it with BT to let files be re formatted or re factored and it didn’t quite work it as we want. And I think it’s partially because… but you’ll be able to explain better to me but I’m guessing it’s partially because it cannot adhere to our specific coding conventions, right? So, if there was a way to, and I’m sure we can give some instructions to ChatGPT, it’s just that I know from my own practice that you can provide instructions to ChatGPT and it listens to it kind of for a while and then it starts doing its own thing. Again. So if you could just say, “hey, ChatGPT, these are the rules” and then reformat that will be super powerful. So that’s probably a company in itself.
AB: Yeah.
AL: You could start for that use case… to your question of… just a little bit how we think about our code. Now, our code by the way, I mean our own solution is in a JavaScript. It’s for those who know front end is react back in those notes. So I honestly don’t know at these days what we’re using. I used a quote four years ago when we started this thing that it’s been a four, five years ago, time flies. So I’m past that point, but… what we do of course generate SQL and all the SQL, we create is already optimize as much as we can because we want to make sure there’s no, there’s none of those infamous time outs in Marketing Cloud. Yeah. But, we have other ways around that too. I’m sorry, I feel like making a say on a side here. But aside from just having as optimal optimized code as we can to make sure that we don’t have time out, we also have other ways to work around that. And I don’t think I have to go into too much detail right now. But so far as to say one of our customers, has a huge database and when is a huge database? I mean, they have 170,000,000 contacts and they have one data extension that has 1.2 billion records.
It’s a huge customer not just from ours but, from Marketing Cloud. Pretty cool. Unfortunately, I can’t mention their name just yet, but yeah. So we can handle that stuff. So, and then maybe my last thought on what you said is I guess the question is also like when do you use AMPScript versus SSDS?
AB: Yeah.
AL: I’m gonna be really honest. I’m not a super expert in either, like I know how to write in JavaScript and AMPScript. I think what you said makes sense. I think the reason why, so what you said was AMPScript for small stuff, SSGS for more complex stuff. And that intuitively makes sense to me because as us is JavaScript which is way more powerful than AMPScript, which is very specific language to Marketing Cloud. I think why they drop into AMPScript is that because most people start using Marketing Cloud even if they want to learn the technical stuff, JavaScript is its own language, right? So you really need to be a developer to understand what’s going on.
AB: Yeah, but I think also like it’s like in most of the case like as soon as you build like complex solution, you have to use both and you merge like both language into the same… piece of code. And because there is things that are easier to do with AMPScript because I think it’s like, a new version like it’s more recent than SSGS. I think SSGS is an old version of JavaScript basically. But yeah, yeah. After like it depends but I think it’s really interesting is if as an organization you define when to use what and also like you try to standardize and a naming convention for pretty much like everything. Because like if you do this effort as the beginning, then you will have like a clean Marketing Cloud instance and everyone will benefit from its event.
AL: Clean Marketing Cloud instance. Now, you’re just talking nonsense, let’s get real. But, but I mean, there’s also a few use cases. I remember that SSGS can solve specifically, that AMPScript just can’t and I think one of the use cases is if, when you wanna deal with rows in an e-mail, so a concrete example, you’re a retailer, someone makes a purchase with three items being able to show those three items in the e-mail I believe can only be done with SSGS. Not really with AMPScript in a good scalable way.
AB: Yeah. I’m not sure about this one.
AL: Well, I mean someone can maybe check fact checkme. You like hopefully maybe one of the NPS is listening to comment, in the comments on the video that’ll be it’ll be pretty well.
AB: And, and just yes, like DESelect is… I was wondering like DESelect is the organisation on the AppExchange for Marketing Cloud. That, that is one of the, you guys are one of the most popular apps basically on the AppExchange for Marketing Cloud, no?
AL: I believe so. I believe we have more reviews than any other provider.
AB: Okay. Yeah, that’s a huge… what you created over the time.
AL: Thanks you’re very kind. Well, I feel we’re still only getting started there’s so so much more we can do, and so many more customers to serve and so much more stuff to build. But I’m pretty happy where we got so far. I think it’s something to be proud of you.
AL: Do you think like from your point of view, there is a stage where you would like to integrate DESelect with the other Marketing Cloud marketing platform, for example, like Adobe or I don’t know Marketo or like, you know, like or even DESelect becoming like your own platform. That could, what’s the future plan for DESelect from your point of view?
AL: It’s a great question. I think about every investor asks me about it and every single one who works for us asks me to. So first of, I will say we are really already a platform in our own right. What I can in with that is we have multiple capabilities and we actually run our own infrastructure, right? So, our solution like Engage is built on Google Cloud platform actually, which is massively scalable. It can filter… 1.2M messages per hour for a given customer, which is huge… and I can probably scale it up infinitely by the way. But so it’s its own platform. But to answer your question, when, and if we support our platforms, I will just say stay tuned to.
AB: All ready… that we at like we wanted to know, but yeah, that would be interesting. Like I think it would be exciting like in the future like, but yeah, but if you say stay tuned, I will not push.
AL: I’ll leave the audience with a cliffhanger there. Yeah. Hey, coming back to if we can geek out a little bit longer about code principles. There’s actually another sort of design principle customers can make not just between SSGS or AMPScript, but also flow between AMPScript and SQL. Now, let me interrupt that. So AMPScript is more of a front end language. Typically you use it to personalize your emails. SQL is a backend language using query your database. So what’s the link? Well, we see. And this is something that we didn’t really think about when we start out to be honest, but we saw a very smart customers use DESelect to create queries, where essentially they did all a personalization already in the data. And so when they write the e-mail and afterwards, they can use drag and drop personalization fields and they don’t need developers time anymore to create those front end e-mail templates or at least much less. So, I think that’s another interesting design choice you can make as a company.
AB: So if I understand correctly, it’s like, you link AMPscript with your e-mail template. No, with like the SQL basic?
AL: You don’t even need AMPscript. I mean, there are personalization fields. I know there’s script personalization fields too, but I think there are some drag-and-drop functions too to just get field names. So say, your first name, right? Like a very simple one. So what people can do? I, so I’ll give one example say, you have a use case where you want to send an e-mail to a person and you want to… refer to their last purchase like, you know, you got a pair of sneakers, you wanna say, hey, Arthur about your sneakers, whatever. So there’s two ways of doing that. Essentially, you could do something like in AMPScript, say, I’m gonna create a lookup to the table or purchases and then the last item and then whatever, or you can say, well, I’m gonna write a SQL query that merges contacts with their last purchase. And so I, the data I have it. Now, if you don’t have any other options, these options are kind of equal, right? It just really depends where do you want to manage your code? But if you want nontechnical marketers to use the e-mail itself without relying on developers, it’s probably better that you do the coding in the back end in the, excuse me, in the a, in the data in the data. So our customers who have these like segments, they figure this out, and they do all the personalization as much as they can at the level of the data which they can do with non technical users too because it’s an intuitive drag -and-drop in. Yeah. And then in the e-mail, they hardly have to write every any AMPScript anymore.
AB: Yeah, yeah. Yeah. But I think from what I see, we have a lot of customers who that would benefit from DESelect, I think that’s impressive like the number of Marketing Cloud users who don’t have like technical knowledge, and I think, and I think Salesforce is not pushing like Marketing Cloud to be a product that is accessible for everyone. Because, I think that they see themselves as an industry more than a company, and this industry also rely on partners. So, so, so I think like the fact that there is complexity is not… is that 100 percent an issue, you know, like they don’t need to make the product as easy as possible for everyone. And I think where DESelect bring value is like, in this challenge that people without technical knowledge can start using the platform. Is that what you see as well?
AL: I mean, yeah, first off, thank you for the kind of words. Look here’s. The thing, I think there’s I think Marketing Cloud is a super performance platform and it is very flexible. Now, the downside of I of that is it’s technical, but the people who originally started ExactTarget, I think they knew what they were doing. I think they were specifically catering to a very technical audience to a very technical user base. Just like Pardot. There’s a very interesting interview with Adam Blitzer, you can find on YouTube where he talks about his journey with part and he says they made the design shows to do the opposite thing, right? They, they went for super easy but less. And I think there’s a customer base for all now. So you need to really understand it because that’s really the history and the legacy, of Marketing Cloud. And I think it’s hard to get rid of without losing some of the value of the flexibility. So it does unfortunately mean that… some customers they may be buy Marketing Cloud thinking it might be more, you know, end-user friendly if I can call it that way. But yeah, that’s often where we come in, that’s often where we come.
AB: Yeah. I don’t know. But I think it’s a great platform in or the case like, yeah, like I remember like the first time I opened in Marketing Cloud was a bit shocked by the design of it, like the UX design of it because it was…
AL: What are you talking about? I have no idea what you’re saying.
AB: I used to work with like started products. So more like may seem, you know, like this kind of small… polished products. And then when I opened Marketing Cloud, I was really, is that the platform that I will work every day with. And at the end of the day, once O, I think you need maybe one, one or two weeks of practice, you know, like to get used, to the interface. And once you start using it, you understand that there is no limit to what you want to achieve with the platform like more or less like everything you want to achieve is doable because you can cut in the platform. Yeah, I think it’s yeah, that you think, is that as well?
AL: Yeah. I mean that’s why it’s so powerful. But Arthur, let me because I really appreciate your candor. Let me ask you this question. What do you see as the biggest challenge in the Marketing Cloud community today? That nobody is talking about?
AB: There is, there is a challenge with the sandbox. I think like… there is a challenge where people cannot learn Marketing Cloud without purchasing the product. So it’s really difficult if you are like, a Trailblazer to learn about Marketing Cloud because you don’t have access to the platform. So all you learn is like theorical knowledge is like learning how to drive on GTA for example, like.
AL: I’m a gamer, I know what you’re talking about.
AB: This is a challenge and also, yeah, like the customer cannot. Yeah, there is friction at this stage, to upskill like, the new wave of like of Marketing Cloud like specialist or consultants. I think this would be interesting to have like a proper sandbox where people can sign up, and use, and also like customer… like the entry ticket for Marketing Cloud is quite expensive. So, so, so, so like… so customer cannot really try it without, you know, like it would be nice if customer could try the platform before signing it.
AL: Yeah. And that’s what we are doing now too. We, we also start with a free version of DESelect Segment so people can try it out and they can install it themselves. But, I see we’re kind of coming up at time soon and I feel we can probably go keep going on for a few hours, but still let me maybe end with this question. Then if I may, because you start talking about, the challenges in learning it. So I’d like to end these interviews typically with the question. What advice would you give to Marketing Cloud, newbies or marketers? Maybe coming from marketing agencies like yourself. We’re trying to transition to Marketing Cloud. What would be your advice to them?
AB: Google is your friend. I will say that because a lot of the answer are already on the internet, like on the Stack Exchange, on YouTube, on the article. So, so, so the more you read every time you have a challenge, like say should read and find the answer on the internet because it’s available. And they are not the first one who face this challenge like me personally. Like there is for most of the things that I build, I have to search on internet. Like, I don’t know, from the top of my directly. So, so it’s like I don’t have like, yeah, like storage, you know, like I a, I just search the information, and I think by doing that, it’s you will work and it’s not about knowing already. It’s about being able to search the information. I think this is a real skill of that. It’s like Marketing Cloud. But I think it’s everything else that is like in our industry, like how do you search the information? How fast, you find the right answer? And, and, yeah, that’s my advice.
AL: It’s funny that you say that I used to say that consulting is just being able to use Google, very well. Oversimplifying, but there’s a lot of truth to that, so.
Thank you for, again for your flexibility for making time. You’ve been a very engaging guest here. So, yeah, I hope to see more of you in the future.
AB: Thank you! Goodbye.